Skip to content

Plaintiff law firm

Almeida Law Group LLC

Almeida Law Group LLC files website tracking lawsuits against businesses. See where it files and what its complaints cite, then check whether your site has the same issues.

Free, about a minute, no signup for your score.

Federal dockets naming the firm

Last 90 days
1
Last 12 months
9
Most recent filing
Oct 23, 2026
Based in
California
Files over
Website tracking
Counts include federal filings from CourtListener and curated state filings with sources. State-court coverage is partial.

The short answer

Almeida Law Group LLC, based in California, is a plaintiff-side law firm named on 9 federal website tracking lawsuit dockets in the last 12 months, 1 of them in the last 90 days, most recently on Oct 23, 2026. Most of its verified filings are against businesses in California. Its complaints most often cite Google Ads conversion and remarketing tag, Google Analytics 4, TikTok Pixel. Counts come from CourtListener docket records and refresh daily.

Where it files

The states and courts in its verified filings

Verified filings in the last 12 months, by the defendant's state and by the federal court the case was filed in.

Defendants by state

Verified filings, 12 months
  1. 1California4
  2. 2Illinois3
  3. 3Massachusetts2
  4. 4North Carolina1
  5. 5Texas1
  6. 6Washington1

Federal courts

Verified filings, 12 months
  1. 1District Court, N.D. California5
  2. 2District Court, C.D. California2
  3. 3District Court, D. Massachusetts2
  4. 4District Court, E.D. California1
  5. 5District Court, S.D. Iowa1
  6. 6District Court, S.D. New York1

Trend

Almeida Law Group LLC filings, month by month

Verified filings linked to the firm, by the month they were filed. Firms file in batches, which is why months jump.

Website accessibility (ADA) Website tracking (CIPA)

November 2025 to October 2026, current month to date

What its complaints cite

The issues named in its complaints

Issues found in the complaint text of its verified filings. If your site has these, a letter from this firm would likely list them.

Issues cited

Complaints, 12 months
  1. 1Google Ads conversion and remarketing tag4
  2. 2Google Analytics 44
  3. 3TikTok Pixel4
  4. 4Meta Pixel3
  5. 5X (Twitter) Pixel3
  6. 6Microsoft Advertising UET tag2
  7. 7Criteo OneTag2
  8. 8Google Tag Manager2

Industries

Industries it sues

Verified filings in the last 12 months by the defendant's industry.

By the defendant's industry

Verified filings, 12 months
  1. 1Medical and health providers3
  2. 2Retail and online stores1

Court records

Latest verified filings by Almeida Law Group LLC

Newest first. Every row links to the court record.
  1. Tracking

    Checchia v. OpenAI OpCo, LLC

    N.D. California, filed by Almeida Law Group LLC. Attributed to California

    Court recordfor Checchia v. OpenAI OpCo, LLC (opens in a new tab)
  2. Tracking

    Wilce v. Willow Health Services, Inc.

    E.D. California, filed by Almeida Law Group LLC. Attributed to Texas

    Court recordfor Wilce v. Willow Health Services, Inc. (opens in a new tab)
  3. Tracking

    A.G. v. STIIIZY, Inc

    C.D. California, filed by Almeida Law Group LLC. Attributed to California

    Court recordfor A.G. v. STIIIZY, Inc (opens in a new tab)
  4. Tracking

    Nicki Apaydin v. Rover Group, Inc.

    C.D. California, filed by Janove PLLC. Attributed to Washington

    Court recordfor Nicki Apaydin v. Rover Group, Inc. (opens in a new tab)
  5. Tracking

    N.G. v. Walgreen Co.

    N.D. California, filed by Almeida Law Group LLC. Attributed to Illinois

    Court recordfor N.G. v. Walgreen Co. (opens in a new tab)
  6. Tracking

    Hsu v. Fantasia Trading LLC

    N.D. California, filed by Almeida Law Group LLC. Attributed to California

    Court recordfor Hsu v. Fantasia Trading LLC (opens in a new tab)
  7. Tracking

    Ward v. Mochi Health Corp.

    N.D. California, filed by Peiffer Wolf Carr Kane Conway & Wise LLP. Attributed to California

    Court recordfor Ward v. Mochi Health Corp. (opens in a new tab)
  8. Tracking

    Morehart v. Openloop Health, Inc.

    S.D. Iowa, filed by Milberg, PLLC. Attributed to Illinois

    Court recordfor Morehart v. Openloop Health, Inc. (opens in a new tab)
  9. Tracking

    Christy v. Lenovo (United States) Inc.

    N.D. California, filed by Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld. Attributed to North Carolina

    Court recordfor Christy v. Lenovo (United States) Inc. (opens in a new tab)
  10. Tracking

    Diego v. Blockratize, Inc.

    S.D. New York, filed by Almeida Law Group LLC. Attributed to Illinois

    Court recordfor Diego v. Blockratize, Inc. (opens in a new tab)
  11. Tracking

    M.C. 1 v. Curriculum Associates, LLC

    D. Massachusetts, filed by DOJ-Civ, Civil Division

    Court recordfor M.C. 1 v. Curriculum Associates, LLC (opens in a new tab)
  12. Tracking

    M.C. 1 v. Curriculum Associates, LLC

    D. Massachusetts, filed by Hecht Partners LLP

    Court recordfor M.C. 1 v. Curriculum Associates, LLC (opens in a new tab)

Questions owners ask

What to do with a letter from this firm, and what these numbers include.
I received a letter from Almeida Law Group LLC. What should I do?
Do not ignore it and do not reply before talking to a lawyer. Preserve the site as it is by taking dated screenshots and a scan, then fix what the letter cites so the record shows the changes and when they happened. The guides on this site explain what these letters usually say and how owners typically respond in the first week.
Is this every case the firm has filed?
No. The counts are federal dockets that name the firm in CourtListener's records, and the list shows the ones Suitcast has verified as website cases. State-court cases without a public source are not counted, so these numbers are a floor.
Why does the firm appear on this site?
Court filings are public records and the firm's name appears on each docket. Suitcast publishes counts and links to those records so business owners can see who is active in their state. It does not comment on the firm and it does not contact the businesses named as defendants.

Keep going

Check your site for what this firm cites

The free scan loads five public pages and lists the trackers that fire before consent and the accessibility failures complaints cite, so the conversation with your lawyer starts with facts.

Free, about a minute, no signup for your score.

Suitcast identifies risk indicators. It is not legal advice and does not determine compliance.