Website lawsuits by industry
Website lawsuits against jewelry stores
Verified filings against jewelry stores
Accessibility (ADA)
- 30 days
- 0
- 90 days
- 1
- 12 months
- 7
Tracking (CIPA)
- 30 days
- 0
- 90 days
- 0
- 12 months
- 0
Filings by month, last 12 months
The short answer
Suitcast counts 7 website accessibility lawsuits in the last 12 months and 0 website tracking lawsuits in the last 12 months against jewelry stores, verified from federal court records and sourced state filings. The most active plaintiff firm is Equal Access Law Group PLLC. Counts refresh daily and are a floor, because state-court coverage is partial.
Trend
Filings against jewelry stores, month by month
Website accessibility (ADA) Website tracking (CIPA)
October 2025 to September 2026, current month to dateWho files
Who files against jewelry stores
Most active plaintiff firms against jewelry stores
Verified filings, last 12 months- 1Equal Access Law Group PLLC2 filings
- 2Gottlieb & Associates1 filing
- 3King & Spalding LLP1 filing
Repeat plaintiffs against jewelry stores
Three or more filings, 12 monthsNo repeat plaintiff here yet
Named plaintiffs appear once they have three or more verified filings against jewelry stores in 12 months. Most website suits are filed by a small group of repeat plaintiffs.
Court records
Latest verified filings against jewelry stores
- AccessibilityCourt recordfor Jackson v. Lisa Gozlan Jewelry LLC (opens in a new tab)
Jackson v. Lisa Gozlan Jewelry LLC
S.D. New York, filed by Gottlieb & Associates. Attributed to Florida
- AccessibilityCourt recordfor Wilson v. The Hamilton Co., Jewelers (opens in a new tab)
Wilson v. The Hamilton Co., Jewelers
N.D. Illinois. Attributed to Illinois
- AccessibilityCourt recordfor Pagan v. Mayors Jewelers of Florida, LLC (opens in a new tab)
Pagan v. Mayors Jewelers of Florida, LLC
S.D. Florida. Attributed to Florida
- AccessibilityCourt recordfor Royal v. Skeie's Jewelers, Inc. (opens in a new tab)
Royal v. Skeie's Jewelers, Inc.
N.D. Illinois, filed by Equal Access Law Group PLLC. Attributed to Illinois
- AccessibilityCourt recordfor Figueroa v. Luxury Watches USA Corp. (opens in a new tab)
Figueroa v. Luxury Watches USA Corp.
N.D. Illinois. Attributed to Illinois
- AccessibilityCourt recordfor Tesch v. Moonglow Jewelry, LLC (opens in a new tab)
Tesch v. Moonglow Jewelry, LLC
N.D. Indiana, filed by Equal Access Law Group PLLC. Attributed to Indiana
- AccessibilityCourt recordfor Bennett v. Bryn Mawr Jewelry Company, Inc. (opens in a new tab)
Bennett v. Bryn Mawr Jewelry Company, Inc.
N.D. Illinois, filed by King & Spalding LLP. Attributed to Illinois
Other industries
Website lawsuits in other industries
- Dental practices
- Medical and health providers
- Restaurants and bars
- Retail and online stores
- Clothing and fashion brands
- Salons, spas and beauty
- Gyms and fitness studios
- Hotels and travel
- Real estate
- Law firms
- Home services and contractors
- Auto dealers and repair
- Food and beverage brands
- Schools and education
- Nonprofits and religious organizations
- Banks, lenders and insurance
- Entertainment and media
- Professional services
Questions owners ask
- Why are jewelry stores sued over their websites?
- Because they run the tools complaints name: booking or contact forms without labels, image-heavy pages without descriptions, and marketing pixels or chat widgets that load before a visitor consents. Plaintiff firms search for those patterns and file in batches, which is why the same industry shows up repeatedly in a month.
- How is the industry determined?
- From the defendant's name and, when the complaint is available, its description of the business, mapped to one of twenty industry groups. Cases whose industry cannot be determined are counted in state totals but not on industry pages.
- Does this list include state-court cases?
- Partly. Federal filings are complete for what CourtListener publishes; state filings are added weekly from public sources with a link on each row. Every count carries that note.
Check your website before a firm does
Suitcast identifies risk indicators. It is not legal advice and does not determine compliance.