Website lawsuits by industry
Website lawsuits against dental practices
Verified filings against dental practices
Accessibility (ADA)
- 30 days
- 0
- 90 days
- 2
- 12 months
- 4
Tracking (CIPA)
- 30 days
- 0
- 90 days
- 0
- 12 months
- 2
Filings by month, last 12 months
The short answer
Suitcast counts 4 website accessibility lawsuits in the last 12 months and 2 website tracking lawsuits in the last 12 months against dental practices, verified from federal court records and sourced state filings. The most active plaintiff firm is Bursor & Fisher P.A.. Counts refresh daily and are a floor, because state-court coverage is partial.
Trend
Filings against dental practices, month by month
Website accessibility (ADA) Website tracking (CIPA)
October 2025 to September 2026, current month to dateWho files
Who files against dental practices
Most active plaintiff firms against dental practices
Verified filings, last 12 monthsRepeat plaintiffs against dental practices
Three or more filings, 12 monthsNo repeat plaintiff here yet
Named plaintiffs appear once they have three or more verified filings against dental practices in 12 months. Most website suits are filed by a small group of repeat plaintiffs.
Court records
Latest verified filings against dental practices
- AccessibilityCourt recordfor ORCEL v. NUVA SMILE, LLC (opens in a new tab)
ORCEL v. NUVA SMILE, LLC
D. New Jersey. Attributed to New Jersey
- AccessibilityCourt recordfor ORCEL v. NOVA DENTAL ASSOCIATES, PC (opens in a new tab)
ORCEL v. NOVA DENTAL ASSOCIATES, PC
D. New Jersey. Attributed to New Jersey
- AccessibilityCourt recordfor Anderson v. American Dental Associates, LTD. (opens in a new tab)
Anderson v. American Dental Associates, LTD.
N.D. Illinois, filed by Equal Access Law Group PLLC. Attributed to Illinois
- TrackingCourt recordfor Martin v. Retriever Medical/Dental Payments LLC (opens in a new tab)
Martin v. Retriever Medical/Dental Payments LLC
S.D. New York, filed by Dwoskin Wasdin LLP
- TrackingCourt recordfor Herzman v. Smile Brands Inc. (opens in a new tab)
Herzman v. Smile Brands Inc.
S.D. California, filed by Bursor & Fisher P.A.
- AccessibilityCourt recordfor Ford v. Smile Design Studio of Hyde Park, LLC (opens in a new tab)
Ford v. Smile Design Studio of Hyde Park, LLC
N.D. Illinois. Attributed to Illinois
Other industries
Website lawsuits in other industries
- Medical and health providers
- Restaurants and bars
- Retail and online stores
- Clothing and fashion brands
- Jewelry stores
- Salons, spas and beauty
- Gyms and fitness studios
- Hotels and travel
- Real estate
- Law firms
- Home services and contractors
- Auto dealers and repair
- Food and beverage brands
- Schools and education
- Nonprofits and religious organizations
- Banks, lenders and insurance
- Entertainment and media
- Professional services
Questions owners ask
- Why are dental practices sued over their websites?
- Because they run the tools complaints name: booking or contact forms without labels, image-heavy pages without descriptions, and marketing pixels or chat widgets that load before a visitor consents. Plaintiff firms search for those patterns and file in batches, which is why the same industry shows up repeatedly in a month.
- How is the industry determined?
- From the defendant's name and, when the complaint is available, its description of the business, mapped to one of twenty industry groups. Cases whose industry cannot be determined are counted in state totals but not on industry pages.
- Does this list include state-court cases?
- Partly. Federal filings are complete for what CourtListener publishes; state filings are added weekly from public sources with a link on each row. Every count carries that note.
Check your website before a firm does
Suitcast identifies risk indicators. It is not legal advice and does not determine compliance.