Skip to content

Website lawsuits by industry

Website lawsuits against restaurants and bars

Two kinds of website lawsuit are filed against businesses every week: over tracking scripts that run before a visitor agrees, and over accessibility failures. See who was sued, then check your own site.

Free, about a minute, no signup for your score.

Verified filings against restaurants and bars

Accessibility (ADA)

30 days
0
90 days
1
12 months
18

Tracking (CIPA)

30 days
0
90 days
0
12 months
2

Filings by month, last 12 months

Updated Sep 14, 2026How cases are verified

The short answer

Suitcast counts 18 website accessibility lawsuits in the last 12 months and 2 website tracking lawsuits in the last 12 months against restaurants and bars, verified from federal court records and sourced state filings. The most active plaintiff firm is Gottlieb & Associates. Counts refresh daily and are a floor, because state-court coverage is partial.

Trend

Filings against restaurants and bars, month by month

Accessibility and tracking filings stacked by the month they were filed.

Website accessibility (ADA) Website tracking (CIPA)

October 2025 to September 2026, current month to date

Who files

Who files against restaurants and bars

Plaintiff firms and repeat plaintiffs with verified filings against this industry in the last 12 months.

Repeat plaintiffs against restaurants and bars

Three or more filings, 12 months

No repeat plaintiff here yet

Named plaintiffs appear once they have three or more verified filings against restaurants and bars in 12 months. Most website suits are filed by a small group of repeat plaintiffs.

Court records

Latest verified filings against restaurants and bars

Newest first. Every row links to the court record.
  1. Accessibility

    Macon v. Bark Park at Dog Dayz Cafe, LLC

    M.D. Florida. Attributed to Florida

    Court recordfor Macon v. Bark Park at Dog Dayz Cafe, LLC (opens in a new tab)
  2. Accessibility

    ORCEL v. RESTAURANT INVESTMENT GROUP, LLC

    D. New Jersey. Attributed to New Jersey

    Court recordfor ORCEL v. RESTAURANT INVESTMENT GROUP, LLC (opens in a new tab)
  3. Accessibility

    Bennett v. Stonewall Kitchen, LLC

    N.D. Illinois. Attributed to Illinois

    Court recordfor Bennett v. Stonewall Kitchen, LLC (opens in a new tab)
  4. Accessibility

    Espinal v. Allagash Brewing Company

    S.D. New York, filed by Gottlieb & Associates. Attributed to New York

    Court recordfor Espinal v. Allagash Brewing Company (opens in a new tab)
  5. Accessibility

    ORCEL v. REDSTONE AMERICAN GRILL, INC.

    D. New Jersey. Attributed to New Jersey

    Court recordfor ORCEL v. REDSTONE AMERICAN GRILL, INC. (opens in a new tab)
  6. Accessibility

    O'Donnell v. Swahili Village Bar & Restaurant Boma LLC

    D. Massachusetts. Attributed to Massachusetts

    Court recordfor O'Donnell v. Swahili Village Bar & Restaurant Boma LLC (opens in a new tab)
  7. Accessibility

    Randolph v. Kitchen Resource Direct LLC

    N.D. Illinois, filed by Horowitz Law, PLLC. Attributed to Illinois

    Court recordfor Randolph v. Kitchen Resource Direct LLC (opens in a new tab)
  8. Accessibility

    Espinoza v. KURA SUSHI USA, INC.

    S.D. Florida, filed by Adams & Associates, P.A.. Attributed to Florida

    Court recordfor Espinoza v. KURA SUSHI USA, INC. (opens in a new tab)
  9. Accessibility

    Faldonie v. Anna's Taqueria, LLC

    D. Massachusetts. Attributed to Massachusetts

    Court recordfor Faldonie v. Anna's Taqueria, LLC (opens in a new tab)
  10. Accessibility

    Fagnani v. Three Little Pigs Bbq & Catering, LLC

    S.D. New York, filed by Gottlieb & Associates. Attributed to New York

    Court recordfor Fagnani v. Three Little Pigs Bbq & Catering, LLC (opens in a new tab)
  11. Accessibility

    PROVEYER v. BLAZE PIZZA, LLC.

    S.D. Florida, filed by Adams & Associates, P.A.. Attributed to Florida

    Court recordfor PROVEYER v. BLAZE PIZZA, LLC. (opens in a new tab)
  12. Accessibility

    Fagnani v. Burnt Finger BBQ LLC

    S.D. New York, filed by Gottlieb & Associates. Attributed to New York

    Court recordfor Fagnani v. Burnt Finger BBQ LLC (opens in a new tab)
  13. Tracking

    Mun v. Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen, Inc.

    S.D. Florida, filed by Rennert Vogel Mandler & Rodriguez

    Court recordfor Mun v. Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen, Inc. (opens in a new tab)
  14. Accessibility

    Proveyer v. Prince St. Pizza LLC

    S.D. Florida, filed by Mendez Law Offices, PLLC. Attributed to Florida

    Court recordfor Proveyer v. Prince St. Pizza LLC (opens in a new tab)
  15. Accessibility

    Figueroa v. RP Restaurant, LLC

    N.D. Illinois, filed by Laner Muchin, Ltd.. Attributed to Illinois

    Court recordfor Figueroa v. RP Restaurant, LLC (opens in a new tab)
  16. Accessibility

    Wills v. Poppy's Cafe + Bakery, LLC

    E.D. New York. Attributed to New York

    Court recordfor Wills v. Poppy's Cafe + Bakery, LLC (opens in a new tab)
  17. Tracking

    Lawrence Schallert v. Tundra Restaurant Supply, LLC

    C.D. California

    Court recordfor Lawrence Schallert v. Tundra Restaurant Supply, LLC (opens in a new tab)
  18. Accessibility

    Alexandria v. 2791 Broadway Restaurant Group, LLC

    S.D. New York. Attributed to New York

    Court recordfor Alexandria v. 2791 Broadway Restaurant Group, LLC (opens in a new tab)
  19. Accessibility

    Valencia v. Chi Restaurant & Bar, Inc.

    S.D. New York. Attributed to New York

    Court recordfor Valencia v. Chi Restaurant & Bar, Inc. (opens in a new tab)
  20. Accessibility

    Valencia v. Golden Unicorn Restaurant Corp.

    S.D. New York. Attributed to New York

    Court recordfor Valencia v. Golden Unicorn Restaurant Corp. (opens in a new tab)

Questions owners ask

Why restaurants and bars are sued over their websites, and how these numbers are built.
Why are restaurants and bars sued over their websites?
Because they run the tools complaints name: booking or contact forms without labels, image-heavy pages without descriptions, and marketing pixels or chat widgets that load before a visitor consents. Plaintiff firms search for those patterns and file in batches, which is why the same industry shows up repeatedly in a month.
How is the industry determined?
From the defendant's name and, when the complaint is available, its description of the business, mapped to one of twenty industry groups. Cases whose industry cannot be determined are counted in state totals but not on industry pages.
Does this list include state-court cases?
Partly. Federal filings are complete for what CourtListener publishes; state filings are added weekly from public sources with a link on each row. Every count carries that note.

Check your website before a firm does

The free scan loads five public pages, lists the trackers that fire before consent and the accessibility failures complaints cite, and matches them to filings against restaurants and bars.

Free, about a minute, no signup for your score.

Suitcast identifies risk indicators. It is not legal advice and does not determine compliance.