Skip to content

Updated daily from court records

Website lawsuits in the United States

Two kinds of website lawsuit are filed against businesses every week: over tracking scripts that run before a visitor agrees, and over accessibility failures. See who was sued, then check your own site.

Free, about a minute, no signup for your score.

Verified website lawsuit filings, nationwide

Accessibility (ADA)

30 days
27
90 days
109
12 months
834

Tracking (CIPA)

30 days
9
90 days
55
12 months
420

Filings by month, last 12 months

Updated Sep 14, 2026How cases are verified

The short answer

Suitcast counts 834 website accessibility lawsuits in the last 12 months and 420 website tracking lawsuits in the last 12 months in US courts, verified from federal court records and sourced state filings. The most active plaintiff firm is Equal Access Law Group PLLC. Counts refresh daily and are a floor, because state-court coverage is partial.

Across the country

Where website lawsuits are filed

Tiles are shaded by verified filings on record for each state over the last 12 months. Accessibility suits count toward the court's or the defendant's state, tracking suits toward the defendant's state.

All 50 states

Every state, by filings on record

Sorted by 12-month total. Each state page lists its filings, firms and repeat plaintiffs.
  • Accessibility, 30 days
    2
    Accessibility, 12 months
    315
    Tracking, 30 days
    1
    Tracking, 12 months
    1
  • Accessibility, 30 days
    3
    Accessibility, 12 months
    216
    Tracking, 30 days
    1
    Tracking, 12 months
    5
  • Accessibility, 30 days
    6
    Accessibility, 12 months
    87
    Tracking, 30 days
    0
    Tracking, 12 months
    0
  • Accessibility, 30 days
    1
    Accessibility, 12 months
    74
    Tracking, 30 days
    0
    Tracking, 12 months
    0
  • Accessibility, 30 days
    0
    Accessibility, 12 months
    53
    Tracking, 30 days
    0
    Tracking, 12 months
    0
  • Accessibility, 30 days
    0
    Accessibility, 12 months
    27
    Tracking, 30 days
    0
    Tracking, 12 months
    0
  • Accessibility, 30 days
    6
    Accessibility, 12 months
    12
    Tracking, 30 days
    4
    Tracking, 12 months
    8
  • Accessibility, 30 days
    1
    Accessibility, 12 months
    11
    Tracking, 30 days
    0
    Tracking, 12 months
    0
  • Accessibility, 30 days
    1
    Accessibility, 12 months
    3
    Tracking, 30 days
    0
    Tracking, 12 months
    3
  • Accessibility, 30 days
    0
    Accessibility, 12 months
    6
    Tracking, 30 days
    0
    Tracking, 12 months
    0
  • Accessibility, 30 days
    0
    Accessibility, 12 months
    5
    Tracking, 30 days
    0
    Tracking, 12 months
    1
  • Accessibility, 30 days
    1
    Accessibility, 12 months
    5
    Tracking, 30 days
    0
    Tracking, 12 months
    0
  • Accessibility, 30 days
    1
    Accessibility, 12 months
    4
    Tracking, 30 days
    0
    Tracking, 12 months
    0
  • Accessibility, 30 days
    1
    Accessibility, 12 months
    4
    Tracking, 30 days
    0
    Tracking, 12 months
    0
  • Accessibility, 30 days
    0
    Accessibility, 12 months
    1
    Tracking, 30 days
    2
    Tracking, 12 months
    2
  • Accessibility, 30 days
    0
    Accessibility, 12 months
    2
    Tracking, 30 days
    0
    Tracking, 12 months
    0
  • Accessibility, 30 days
    0
    Accessibility, 12 months
    1
    Tracking, 30 days
    0
    Tracking, 12 months
    1
  • Accessibility, 30 days
    0
    Accessibility, 12 months
    1
    Tracking, 30 days
    0
    Tracking, 12 months
    0
  • Accessibility, 30 days
    0
    Accessibility, 12 months
    1
    Tracking, 30 days
    0
    Tracking, 12 months
    0
  • Accessibility, 30 days
    1
    Accessibility, 12 months
    1
    Tracking, 30 days
    0
    Tracking, 12 months
    0
  • Accessibility, 30 days
    0
    Accessibility, 12 months
    1
    Tracking, 30 days
    0
    Tracking, 12 months
    0
  • Accessibility, 30 days
    0
    Accessibility, 12 months
    0
    Tracking, 30 days
    0
    Tracking, 12 months
    1
  • Accessibility, 30 days
    0
    Accessibility, 12 months
    0
    Tracking, 30 days
    1
    Tracking, 12 months
    1
  • Accessibility, 30 days
    1
    Accessibility, 12 months
    1
    Tracking, 30 days
    0
    Tracking, 12 months
    0
  • Accessibility, 30 days
    1
    Accessibility, 12 months
    1
    Tracking, 30 days
    0
    Tracking, 12 months
    0
  • Accessibility, 30 days
    0
    Accessibility, 12 months
    1
    Tracking, 30 days
    0
    Tracking, 12 months
    0
  • Accessibility, 30 days
    1
    Accessibility, 12 months
    1
    Tracking, 30 days
    0
    Tracking, 12 months
    0

Trend

Website lawsuit filings, month by month

Every verified filing nationwide, stacked by theory and the month it was filed.

Website accessibility (ADA) Website tracking (CIPA)

October 2025 to September 2026, current month to date

Who files

The firms and plaintiffs behind the numbers

A small group of plaintiff firms and repeat plaintiffs files most website lawsuits, and files them in batches.

Repeat plaintiffs nationwide

Three or more filings, 12 months
  1. 1Washington Benavides Moran27
  2. 2Livingston Bennett22
  3. 3Lucas Rice20
  4. 4Howard Wilson17
  5. 5Judith Adela Fernandez Martinez17

Court records

Latest verified filings nationwide

Newest first. Every row links to the court record or the curated source.
  1. Accessibility

    Proveyer v. Driven Brands, Inc.

    S.D. Florida, filed by Adams & Associates, P.A.. Attributed to Florida

    Court recordfor Proveyer v. Driven Brands, Inc. (opens in a new tab)
  2. Accessibility

    Castro v. Tempur-Pedic North America, LLC

    S.D. Florida, filed by Mendez Law Offices, PLLC. Attributed to Florida

    Court recordfor Castro v. Tempur-Pedic North America, LLC (opens in a new tab)
  3. Tracking

    Kelly v. Life360, Inc.

    C.D. California. Attributed to California

    Court recordfor Kelly v. Life360, Inc. (opens in a new tab)
  4. Tracking

    Sanchez v. QuinStreet, Inc.

    S.D. California. Attributed to California

    Court recordfor Sanchez v. QuinStreet, Inc. (opens in a new tab)
  5. Tracking

    Luis Licea v. Planet Fitness Franchising, LLC

    C.D. California. Attributed to New Hampshire

    Court recordfor Luis Licea v. Planet Fitness Franchising, LLC (opens in a new tab)
  6. Accessibility

    Espinal v. Panier Des Sens, Inc.

    S.D. New York, filed by Gottlieb & Associates. Attributed to Florida

    Court recordfor Espinal v. Panier Des Sens, Inc. (opens in a new tab)
  7. Tracking

    Pasquini v. Ziff Davis, Inc.

    N.D. California. Attributed to New York

    Court recordfor Pasquini v. Ziff Davis, Inc. (opens in a new tab)
  8. Accessibility

    Benavides Moran v. Baronfig Inc.

    S.D. New York, filed by Gottlieb & Associates. Attributed to New York

    Court recordfor Benavides Moran v. Baronfig Inc. (opens in a new tab)
  9. Accessibility

    Benavides Moran v. Marketfair Commerce Inc.

    S.D. New York, filed by Gottlieb & Associates. Attributed to New Jersey

    Court recordfor Benavides Moran v. Marketfair Commerce Inc. (opens in a new tab)
  10. Accessibility

    Benavides Moran v. Gloves In A Bottle, Inc.

    S.D. New York, filed by Gottlieb & Associates. Attributed to California

    Court recordfor Benavides Moran v. Gloves In A Bottle, Inc. (opens in a new tab)
  11. Accessibility

    Cesario v. Atelier Luxury Group, LLC

    S.D. New York, filed by Joseph & Norinsberg, LLC. Attributed to California

    Court recordfor Cesario v. Atelier Luxury Group, LLC (opens in a new tab)
  12. Accessibility

    Benavides Moran v. Ryse Usa, Inc.

    S.D. New York, filed by Gottlieb & Associates. Attributed to California

    Court recordfor Benavides Moran v. Ryse Usa, Inc. (opens in a new tab)
  13. Accessibility

    Benavides Moran v. The Goulet Pen Company, LLC

    S.D. New York, filed by Gottlieb & Associates. Attributed to Virginia

    Court recordfor Benavides Moran v. The Goulet Pen Company, LLC (opens in a new tab)
  14. Accessibility

    Benavides Moran v. Value Max Products, LLC

    S.D. New York, filed by Gottlieb & Associates. Attributed to Michigan

    Court recordfor Benavides Moran v. Value Max Products, LLC (opens in a new tab)
  15. Tracking

    Kizior v. Health Care Service Corporation

    N.D. Illinois. Attributed to Illinois

    Court recordfor Kizior v. Health Care Service Corporation (opens in a new tab)
  16. Tracking

    Edward Lominchar v. TikTok USDS Joint Venture, LLC

    C.D. California. Attributed to California

    Court recordfor Edward Lominchar v. TikTok USDS Joint Venture, LLC (opens in a new tab)
  17. Accessibility

    Rivera v. Eden

    S.D. New York, filed by Joseph & Norinsberg, LLC. Attributed to New York

    Court recordfor Rivera v. Eden (opens in a new tab)
  18. Accessibility

    Diaz v. Mush Foods, Inc.

    S.D. New York, filed by Joseph & Norinsberg, LLC. Attributed to Illinois

    Court recordfor Diaz v. Mush Foods, Inc. (opens in a new tab)
  19. Accessibility

    Fernandez v. Benihana, Inc.

    M.D. Florida, filed by Law Office of Pelayo Duran, PA. Attributed to Florida

    Court recordfor Fernandez v. Benihana, Inc. (opens in a new tab)
  20. Tracking

    Lombard v. Redfin Corporation

    S.D. Florida, filed by Jared M Slade. Attributed to Washington

    Court recordfor Lombard v. Redfin Corporation (opens in a new tab)
  21. Accessibility

    Benavides Moran v. Ana Luisa Retail LLC

    S.D. New York, filed by Gottlieb & Associates. Attributed to New York

    Court recordfor Benavides Moran v. Ana Luisa Retail LLC (opens in a new tab)
  22. Accessibility

    Benavides Moran v. Scandinavian Designs, Inc.

    S.D. New York, filed by Gottlieb & Associates. Attributed to Idaho

    Court recordfor Benavides Moran v. Scandinavian Designs, Inc. (opens in a new tab)
  23. Accessibility

    Battle v. Empava Appliances Inc.

    N.D. Illinois, filed by Horowitz Law, PLLC. Attributed to California

    Court recordfor Battle v. Empava Appliances Inc. (opens in a new tab)
  24. Accessibility

    Rivera v. Bop, LLC

    S.D. New York, filed by Joseph & Norinsberg, LLC. Attributed to Wisconsin

    Court recordfor Rivera v. Bop, LLC (opens in a new tab)
  25. Accessibility

    Randolph v. Bradshaw Taylor USA Inc.

    N.D. Illinois, filed by Horowitz Law, PLLC. Attributed to Colorado

    Court recordfor Randolph v. Bradshaw Taylor USA Inc. (opens in a new tab)

Questions owners ask

What is counted, why some states are low, and how to cite the numbers.
What counts as a website lawsuit here?
Two kinds of federal filing: Americans with Disabilities Act cases that claim a website is not usable by people with disabilities, and California Invasion of Privacy Act cases that claim tracking scripts on a website recorded visitors without consent. Only cases verified as website cases are counted; physical-access ADA suits and criminal wiretap matters are excluded.
Why is my state's number low or zero?
Federal website accessibility suits concentrate in a few venues, mainly Illinois, New York, Florida, Wisconsin and Indiana, and about three in four tracking suits are filed in California against companies anywhere. A state page shows national numbers next to the local ones whenever the local count is under five, so the page is still useful.
How current are the numbers?
Federal filings are pulled from CourtListener every morning and the pages rebuild daily. In the last 12 months the dataset holds 834 verified accessibility filings and 420 verified tracking filings. Attorney and firm names sometimes arrive a few days after filing and are refreshed for two weeks.
Can I cite these numbers?
Yes. The data page explains the method, the limits and the preferred citation line, and offers the aggregates as JSON. Every case row on every page links to the court record or the curated source.

See which of these complaints name issues your site has

The free scan loads five public pages, lists the trackers that fire before consent and the accessibility failures complaints cite, and matches them to filings in your state and industry.

Free, about a minute, no signup for your score.

Suitcast identifies risk indicators. It is not legal advice and does not determine compliance.