Skip to content

Website lawsuits by industry

Website lawsuits against medical and health providers

Two kinds of website lawsuit are filed against businesses every week: over tracking scripts that run before a visitor agrees, and over accessibility failures. See who was sued, then check your own site.

Free, about a minute, no signup for your score.

Verified filings against medical and health providers

Accessibility (ADA)

30 days
1
90 days
2
12 months
8

Tracking (CIPA)

30 days
0
90 days
2
12 months
21

Filings by month, last 12 months

Updated Oct 31, 2026How cases are verified

The short answer

Suitcast counts 8 website accessibility lawsuits in the last 12 months and 21 website tracking lawsuits in the last 12 months against medical and health providers, verified from federal court records and sourced state filings. The most active plaintiff firm is Gottlieb & Associates. Counts refresh daily and are a floor, because state-court coverage is partial.

Trend

Filings against medical and health providers, month by month

Accessibility and tracking filings stacked by the month they were filed.

Website accessibility (ADA) Website tracking (CIPA)

November 2025 to October 2026, current month to date

Who files

Who files against medical and health providers

Plaintiff firms and repeat plaintiffs with verified filings against this industry in the last 12 months.

Repeat plaintiffs against medical and health providers

Three or more filings, 12 months

No repeat plaintiff here yet

Named plaintiffs appear once they have three or more verified filings against medical and health providers in 12 months. Most website suits are filed by a small group of repeat plaintiffs.

Court records

Latest verified filings against medical and health providers

Newest first. Every row links to the court record.
  1. Accessibility

    Pagan v. GN Hearing Care Corporation

    S.D. Florida. Attributed to Florida

    Court recordfor Pagan v. GN Hearing Care Corporation (opens in a new tab)
  2. Tracking

    Kizior v. Health Care Service Corporation

    N.D. Illinois. Attributed to Illinois

    Court recordfor Kizior v. Health Care Service Corporation (opens in a new tab)
  3. Accessibility

    Benavides Moran v. Winx Health Inc.

    S.D. New York, filed by Gottlieb & Associates. Attributed to Oregon

    Court recordfor Benavides Moran v. Winx Health Inc. (opens in a new tab)
  4. Tracking

    Pearson v. Hims & Hers Health, Inc.

    N.D. California, filed by Schubert Jonckheer & Kolbe. Attributed to California

    Court recordfor Pearson v. Hims & Hers Health, Inc. (opens in a new tab)
  5. Tracking

    Wilce v. Willow Health Services, Inc.

    E.D. California, filed by Almeida Law Group LLC. Attributed to Texas

    Court recordfor Wilce v. Willow Health Services, Inc. (opens in a new tab)
  6. Tracking

    Doe v. Grady Memorial Hospital Corporation

    N.D. Georgia. Attributed to Georgia

    Court recordfor Doe v. Grady Memorial Hospital Corporation (opens in a new tab)
  7. Tracking

    Doe v. Greater Better Health, Inc.

    M.D. Florida, filed by Bryson Harris Suciu & DeMay PLLC. Attributed to New York

    Court recordfor Doe v. Greater Better Health, Inc. (opens in a new tab)
  8. Tracking

    Steve Shannon v. Health Net LLC

    C.D. California, filed by Ahdoot & Wolfson, PC

    Court recordfor Steve Shannon v. Health Net LLC (opens in a new tab)
  9. Tracking

    Washington v. Sutter Health

    N.D. California, filed by Potter Handy, LLP. Attributed to California

    Court recordfor Washington v. Sutter Health (opens in a new tab)
  10. Tracking

    P. v. Kindbridge Behavioral Health, Inc.

    D. Colorado. Attributed to Colorado

    Court recordfor P. v. Kindbridge Behavioral Health, Inc. (opens in a new tab)
  11. Accessibility

    Senior v. Infirst Healthcare Inc.

    S.D. New York, filed by Gottlieb & Associates. Attributed to Connecticut

    Court recordfor Senior v. Infirst Healthcare Inc. (opens in a new tab)
  12. Accessibility

    Lopez v. Ginger Health Company

    S.D. New York, filed by Gottlieb & Associates. Attributed to Texas

    Court recordfor Lopez v. Ginger Health Company (opens in a new tab)
  13. Accessibility

    Cazares v. CP Skin Health Group Inc

    E.D. Wisconsin, filed by Equal Access Law Group PLLC. Attributed to Arizona

    Court recordfor Cazares v. CP Skin Health Group Inc (opens in a new tab)
  14. Tracking

    Doe v. Unlock Health, Inc.

    M.D. Tennessee, filed by Wood Smith Henning & Berman LLP. Attributed to Tennessee

    Court recordfor Doe v. Unlock Health, Inc. (opens in a new tab)
  15. Accessibility

    Pagan v. Ritecare Medical Center, LLC

    S.D. Florida, filed by Ritecare Medical Center, LLC. Attributed to Florida

    Court recordfor Pagan v. Ritecare Medical Center, LLC (opens in a new tab)
  16. Tracking

    Allen v. Openloop Health, Inc.

    S.D. Iowa, filed by Shindler, Anderson, Goplerud & Weese, P.C.. Attributed to Illinois

    Court recordfor Allen v. Openloop Health, Inc. (opens in a new tab)
  17. Tracking

    Ward v. Mochi Health Corp.

    N.D. California, filed by Peiffer Wolf Carr Kane Conway & Wise LLP. Attributed to California

    Court recordfor Ward v. Mochi Health Corp. (opens in a new tab)
  18. Tracking

    Morehart v. Openloop Health, Inc.

    S.D. Iowa, filed by Milberg, PLLC. Attributed to Illinois

    Court recordfor Morehart v. Openloop Health, Inc. (opens in a new tab)
  19. Tracking

    Gaby Jacobson v. Willow Health Services, Inc.

    C.D. California. Attributed to Texas

    Court recordfor Gaby Jacobson v. Willow Health Services, Inc. (opens in a new tab)
  20. Accessibility

    Jenkins v. Hims & Hers Health, Inc.

    S.D. New York, filed by Joseph & Norinsberg, LLC. Attributed to Delaware

    Court recordfor Jenkins v. Hims & Hers Health, Inc. (opens in a new tab)
  21. Tracking

    Jane Heiting v. Trella Health LLC

    C.D. California, filed by Tauler Smith LLP. Attributed to Georgia

    Court recordfor Jane Heiting v. Trella Health LLC (opens in a new tab)
  22. Tracking

    Edquid v. Headlight Health, Inc.

    S.D. California, filed by Swigart Law Group APC. Attributed to California

    Court recordfor Edquid v. Headlight Health, Inc. (opens in a new tab)
  23. Tracking

    John Avots-Smith v. Thrive Health Group, Inc.

    C.D. California. Attributed to California

    Court recordfor John Avots-Smith v. Thrive Health Group, Inc. (opens in a new tab)
  24. Accessibility

    Figueroa v. Designs for Health, Inc.

    N.D. Illinois, filed by Dentons US LLP. Attributed to Illinois

    Court recordfor Figueroa v. Designs for Health, Inc. (opens in a new tab)
  25. Tracking

    Gabriela Silveira Goncalves v. O.C. Medical Aesthetics, Inc.

    C.D. California. Attributed to California

    Court recordfor Gabriela Silveira Goncalves v. O.C. Medical Aesthetics, Inc. (opens in a new tab)

Questions owners ask

Why medical and health providers are sued over their websites, and how these numbers are built.
Why are medical and health providers sued over their websites?
Because they run the tools complaints name: booking or contact forms without labels, image-heavy pages without descriptions, and marketing pixels or chat widgets that load before a visitor consents. Plaintiff firms search for those patterns and file in batches, which is why the same industry shows up repeatedly in a month.
How is the industry determined?
From the defendant's name and, when the complaint is available, its description of the business, mapped to one of twenty industry groups. Cases whose industry cannot be determined are counted in state totals but not on industry pages.
Does this list include state-court cases?
Partly. Federal filings are complete for what CourtListener publishes; state filings are added weekly from public sources with a link on each row. Every count carries that note.

Check your website before a firm does

The free scan loads five public pages, lists the trackers that fire before consent and the accessibility failures complaints cite, and matches them to filings against medical and health providers.

Free, about a minute, no signup for your score.

Suitcast identifies risk indicators. It is not legal advice and does not determine compliance.