Website lawsuits by industry
Website lawsuits against hotels and travel
Verified filings against hotels and travel
Accessibility (ADA)
- 30 days
- 0
- 90 days
- 0
- 12 months
- 4
Tracking (CIPA)
- 30 days
- 0
- 90 days
- 0
- 12 months
- 0
Filings by month, last 12 months
The short answer
Suitcast counts 4 website accessibility lawsuits in the last 12 months and 0 website tracking lawsuits in the last 12 months against hotels and travel, verified from federal court records and sourced state filings. The most active plaintiff firm is Aceto, Bonner & Cole, P.C.. That is under the five filings needed for local statistics, so national figures appear alongside.
Industry is read from the defendant's name and the complaint text, so many filings are counted in state totals before their industry is known. Nationwide, 420 tracking filings and 834 accessibility filings are on record. See the national picture.
Trend
Filings against hotels and travel, month by month
Website accessibility (ADA) Website tracking (CIPA)
October 2025 to September 2026, current month to dateWho files
Who files against hotels and travel
Most active plaintiff firms against hotels and travel
Verified filings, last 12 monthsRepeat plaintiffs against hotels and travel
Three or more filings, 12 monthsNo repeat plaintiff here yet
Named plaintiffs appear once they have three or more verified filings against hotels and travel in 12 months. Most website suits are filed by a small group of repeat plaintiffs.
Court records
Latest verified filings against hotels and travel
- AccessibilityCourt recordfor Odonnell v. DiamondRock Hospitality Company (opens in a new tab)
Odonnell v. DiamondRock Hospitality Company
D. Massachusetts. Attributed to Massachusetts
- AccessibilityCourt recordfor Morris v. Waukesha Hospitality LLC (opens in a new tab)
Morris v. Waukesha Hospitality LLC
E.D. Wisconsin, filed by Stein Saks PLLC. Attributed to Wisconsin
- AccessibilityCourt recordfor Faldonie v. KLW Hospitality, Inc. (opens in a new tab)
Faldonie v. KLW Hospitality, Inc.
D. Massachusetts, filed by Sassoon Cymrot Law LLC. Attributed to Massachusetts
- AccessibilityCourt recordfor Odonnell v. Workshop Hospitality 1375, Inc. (opens in a new tab)
Odonnell v. Workshop Hospitality 1375, Inc.
D. Massachusetts, filed by Aceto, Bonner & Cole, P.C.. Attributed to Massachusetts
Other industries
Website lawsuits in other industries
- Dental practices
- Medical and health providers
- Restaurants and bars
- Retail and online stores
- Clothing and fashion brands
- Jewelry stores
- Salons, spas and beauty
- Gyms and fitness studios
- Real estate
- Law firms
- Home services and contractors
- Auto dealers and repair
- Food and beverage brands
- Schools and education
- Nonprofits and religious organizations
- Banks, lenders and insurance
- Entertainment and media
- Professional services
Questions owners ask
- Why are hotels and travel sued over their websites?
- Because they run the tools complaints name: booking or contact forms without labels, image-heavy pages without descriptions, and marketing pixels or chat widgets that load before a visitor consents. Plaintiff firms search for those patterns and file in batches, which is why the same industry shows up repeatedly in a month.
- How is the industry determined?
- From the defendant's name and, when the complaint is available, its description of the business, mapped to one of twenty industry groups. Cases whose industry cannot be determined are counted in state totals but not on industry pages.
- Does this list include state-court cases?
- Partly. Federal filings are complete for what CourtListener publishes; state filings are added weekly from public sources with a link on each row. Every count carries that note.
Check your website before a firm does
Suitcast identifies risk indicators. It is not legal advice and does not determine compliance.