Plaintiff law firm
DLA Piper US LLP (DC)
DLA Piper US LLP (DC) files website lawsuits against businesses. See where it files and what its complaints cite, then check whether your site has the same issues.
Federal dockets naming the firm
- Last 90 days
- 0
- Last 12 months
- 1
- Most recent filing
- Jan 13, 2026
- Based in
- Not listed
- Files over
Counts include federal filings from CourtListener and curated state filings with sources. State-court coverage is partial.
The short answer
DLA Piper US LLP (DC) is a plaintiff-side law firm named on 1 federal website lawsuit dockets in the last 12 months, 0 of them in the last 90 days, most recently on Jan 13, 2026. Most of its verified filings are against businesses in Virginia. Counts come from CourtListener docket records and refresh daily.
Where it files
The states and courts in its verified filings
Verified filings in the last 12 months, by the defendant's state and by the federal court the case was filed in.
Defendants by state
Verified filings, 12 monthsFederal courts
Verified filings, 12 months- 1District Court, E.D. Virginia2 filings
Trend
DLA Piper US LLP (DC) filings, month by month
Verified filings linked to the firm, by the month they were filed. Firms file in batches, which is why months jump.
Website accessibility (ADA) Website tracking (CIPA)
October 2025 to September 2026, current month to dateCourt records
Latest verified filings by DLA Piper US LLP (DC)
Newest first. Every row links to the court record.
- TrackingCourt recordfor Shah v. Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. (opens in a new tab)
Shah v. Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc.
E.D. Virginia, filed by Gutride Safier LLP
- TrackingCourt recordfor Alexandra Ferrer v. Hilton Domestic Operating Company Inc. (opens in a new tab)
Alexandra Ferrer v. Hilton Domestic Operating Company Inc.
E.D. Virginia, filed by DLA Piper US LLP (DC)
Questions owners ask
What to do with a letter from this firm, and what these numbers include.
- I received a letter from DLA Piper US LLP (DC). What should I do?
- Do not ignore it and do not reply before talking to a lawyer. Preserve the site as it is by taking dated screenshots and a scan, then fix what the letter cites so the record shows the changes and when they happened. The guides on this site explain what these letters usually say and how owners typically respond in the first week.
- Is this every case the firm has filed?
- No. The counts are federal dockets that name the firm in CourtListener's records, and the list shows the ones Suitcast has verified as website cases. State-court cases without a public source are not counted, so these numbers are a floor.
- Why does the firm appear on this site?
- Court filings are public records and the firm's name appears on each docket. Suitcast publishes counts and links to those records so business owners can see who is active in their state. It does not comment on the firm and it does not contact the businesses named as defendants.
Keep going
Check your site for what this firm cites
The free scan loads five public pages and lists the trackers that fire before consent and the accessibility failures complaints cite, so the conversation with your lawyer starts with facts.
Suitcast identifies risk indicators. It is not legal advice and does not determine compliance.