Plaintiff law firm
Michael Best & Friedrich LLP - Chi/IL
Michael Best & Friedrich LLP - Chi/IL files website lawsuits against businesses. See where it files and what its complaints cite, then check whether your site has the same issues.
Federal dockets naming the firm
- Last 90 days
- 0
- Last 12 months
- 1
- Most recent filing
- Jan 29, 2026
- Based in
- Not listed
- Files over
Counts include federal filings from CourtListener and curated state filings with sources. State-court coverage is partial.
The short answer
Michael Best & Friedrich LLP - Chi/IL is a plaintiff-side law firm named on 1 federal website lawsuit dockets in the last 12 months, 0 of them in the last 90 days, most recently on Jan 29, 2026. Most of its verified filings are against businesses in Indiana. Counts come from CourtListener docket records and refresh daily.
Where it files
The states and courts in its verified filings
Verified filings in the last 12 months, by the defendant's state and by the federal court the case was filed in.
Defendants by state
Verified filings, 12 monthsFederal courts
Verified filings, 12 months- 1District Court, N.D. Indiana1 filing
Trend
Michael Best & Friedrich LLP - Chi/IL filings, month by month
Verified filings linked to the firm, by the month they were filed. Firms file in batches, which is why months jump.
Website accessibility (ADA) Website tracking (CIPA)
October 2025 to September 2026, current month to dateCourt records
Latest verified filings by Michael Best & Friedrich LLP - Chi/IL
Newest first. Every row links to the court record.
- AccessibilityCourt recordfor Brolin v. Stitch Golf Holdings Inc. (opens in a new tab)
Brolin v. Stitch Golf Holdings Inc.
N.D. Indiana, filed by Michael Best & Friedrich LLP - Chi/IL. Attributed to Indiana
Questions owners ask
What to do with a letter from this firm, and what these numbers include.
- I received a letter from Michael Best & Friedrich LLP - Chi/IL. What should I do?
- Do not ignore it and do not reply before talking to a lawyer. Preserve the site as it is by taking dated screenshots and a scan, then fix what the letter cites so the record shows the changes and when they happened. The guides on this site explain what these letters usually say and how owners typically respond in the first week.
- Is this every case the firm has filed?
- No. The counts are federal dockets that name the firm in CourtListener's records, and the list shows the ones Suitcast has verified as website cases. State-court cases without a public source are not counted, so these numbers are a floor.
- Why does the firm appear on this site?
- Court filings are public records and the firm's name appears on each docket. Suitcast publishes counts and links to those records so business owners can see who is active in their state. It does not comment on the firm and it does not contact the businesses named as defendants.
Keep going
Check your site for what this firm cites
The free scan loads five public pages and lists the trackers that fire before consent and the accessibility failures complaints cite, so the conversation with your lawyer starts with facts.
Suitcast identifies risk indicators. It is not legal advice and does not determine compliance.