Plaintiff law firm
Acacia Barros, P.A
Federal dockets naming the firm
- Last 90 days
- 0
- Last 12 months
- 3
- Most recent filing
- May 15, 2026
- Based in
- Florida
- Files over
- Website accessibility
The short answer
Acacia Barros, P.A, based in Florida, is a plaintiff-side law firm named on 3 federal website accessibility lawsuit dockets in the last 12 months, 0 of them in the last 90 days, most recently on May 15, 2026. Most of its verified filings are against businesses in Florida. Its complaints most often cite No way to skip past the menu, The page has no main content area, Content sits outside the main page areas. Counts come from CourtListener docket records and refresh daily.
Where it files
The states and courts in its verified filings
Defendants by state
Verified filings, 12 monthsFederal courts
Verified filings, 12 months- 1District Court, S.D. Florida3 filings
Trend
Acacia Barros, P.A filings, month by month
Website accessibility (ADA) Website tracking (CIPA)
December 2025 to November 2026, current month to dateWhat its complaints cite
The issues named in its complaints
Issues cited
Complaints, 12 months- 1No way to skip past the menu1 complaint
- 2The page has no main content area1 complaint
- 3Content sits outside the main page areas1 complaint
Court records
Latest verified filings by Acacia Barros, P.A
- AccessibilityCourt recordfor Mahlberg v. Hard Rock International (USA), Inc. (opens in a new tab)
Mahlberg v. Hard Rock International (USA), Inc.
S.D. Florida, filed by Acacia Barros, P.A.. Attributed to Florida
- AccessibilityCourt recordfor Mahlberg v. U-Haul Co. of Florida Inc. (opens in a new tab)
Mahlberg v. U-Haul Co. of Florida Inc.
S.D. Florida, filed by Acacia Barros, P.A.. Attributed to Florida
- AccessibilityCourt recordfor Mahlberg v. Interbond of America, LLC (opens in a new tab)
Mahlberg v. Interbond of America, LLC
S.D. Florida, filed by Acacia Barros, P.A.. Attributed to Florida
Questions owners ask
- I received a letter from Acacia Barros, P.A. What should I do?
- Do not ignore it and do not reply before talking to a lawyer. Preserve the site as it is by taking dated screenshots and a scan, then fix what the letter cites so the record shows the changes and when they happened. The guides on this site explain what these letters usually say and how owners typically respond in the first week.
- Is this every case the firm has filed?
- No. The counts are federal dockets that name the firm in CourtListener's records, and the list shows the ones Suitcast has verified as website cases. State-court cases without a public source are not counted, so these numbers are a floor.
- Why does the firm appear on this site?
- Court filings are public records and the firm's name appears on each docket. Suitcast publishes counts and links to those records so business owners can see who is active in their state. It does not comment on the firm and it does not contact the businesses named as defendants.
Keep going
- All plaintiff firms, rankedWho files most across the country.
- Website lawsuits by stateCounts, firms and filings for all 50 states.
- How to test your website with only a keyboardTab order, fake buttons, skip links and traps in five minutes.
- ADA website lawsuit letter: what it meansThe first steps owners take.
- I got a CIPA demand letter. What now?What the letter means and what to do in the first week.
Check your site for what this firm cites
Suitcast identifies risk indicators. It is not legal advice and does not determine compliance.