Skip to content

Website lawsuits by industry

Website lawsuits against food and beverage brands

Two kinds of website lawsuit are filed against businesses every week: over tracking scripts that run before a visitor agrees, and over accessibility failures. See who was sued, then check your own site.

Free, about a minute, no signup for your score.

Verified filings against food and beverage brands

Accessibility (ADA)

30 days
1
90 days
1
12 months
17

Tracking (CIPA)

30 days
0
90 days
0
12 months
3

Filings by month, last 12 months

Updated Sep 14, 2026How cases are verified

The short answer

Suitcast counts 17 website accessibility lawsuits in the last 12 months and 3 website tracking lawsuits in the last 12 months against food and beverage brands, verified from federal court records and sourced state filings. The most active plaintiff firm is Equal Access Law Group PLLC. Counts refresh daily and are a floor, because state-court coverage is partial.

Trend

Filings against food and beverage brands, month by month

Accessibility and tracking filings stacked by the month they were filed.

Website accessibility (ADA) Website tracking (CIPA)

October 2025 to September 2026, current month to date

Who files

Who files against food and beverage brands

Plaintiff firms and repeat plaintiffs with verified filings against this industry in the last 12 months.

Repeat plaintiffs against food and beverage brands

Three or more filings, 12 months

No repeat plaintiff here yet

Named plaintiffs appear once they have three or more verified filings against food and beverage brands in 12 months. Most website suits are filed by a small group of repeat plaintiffs.

Court records

Latest verified filings against food and beverage brands

Newest first. Every row links to the court record.
  1. Accessibility

    Diaz v. Mush Foods, Inc.

    S.D. New York, filed by Joseph & Norinsberg, LLC. Attributed to Illinois

    Court recordfor Diaz v. Mush Foods, Inc. (opens in a new tab)
  2. Accessibility

    Pelaez v. Candy Nation LLC

    N.D. Indiana, filed by Equal Access Law Group PLLC. Attributed to Indiana

    Court recordfor Pelaez v. Candy Nation LLC (opens in a new tab)
  3. Accessibility

    Walker v. Goya Foods, Inc.

    N.D. Illinois, filed by Equal Access Law Group PLLC. Attributed to Illinois

    Court recordfor Walker v. Goya Foods, Inc. (opens in a new tab)
  4. Accessibility

    Espinal v. LT Foods Americas, Inc.

    S.D. New York, filed by Gottlieb & Associates. Attributed to New York

    Court recordfor Espinal v. LT Foods Americas, Inc. (opens in a new tab)
  5. Accessibility

    Rice v. Columbia Valley Family Farms Inc

    E.D. Wisconsin, filed by Nye, Stirling, Hale, Miller & Sweet, LLP. Attributed to Wisconsin

    Court recordfor Rice v. Columbia Valley Family Farms Inc (opens in a new tab)
  6. Accessibility

    Bennett v. Sweet Candy Company

    N.D. Illinois, filed by Equal Access Law Group PLLC. Attributed to Illinois

    Court recordfor Bennett v. Sweet Candy Company (opens in a new tab)
  7. Accessibility

    Butler v. CoExist Nutrition LLC

    S.D. New York, filed by Joseph & Norinsberg, LLC. Attributed to New York

    Court recordfor Butler v. CoExist Nutrition LLC (opens in a new tab)
  8. Accessibility

    Gazonni v. Vineyard Vines, LLC

    S.D. Florida, filed by Brasil Brasil PA. Attributed to Florida

    Court recordfor Gazonni v. Vineyard Vines, LLC (opens in a new tab)
  9. Tracking

    Patel v. GT's Living Foods, LLC

    N.D. California, filed by Rosing, Pott & Strohbehn LLP

    Court recordfor Patel v. GT's Living Foods, LLC (opens in a new tab)
  10. Accessibility

    Figueroa v. Moon Juice Ventures, Inc.

    N.D. Illinois, filed by Dentons US LLP. Attributed to Illinois

    Court recordfor Figueroa v. Moon Juice Ventures, Inc. (opens in a new tab)
  11. Tracking

    Munoz v. Peet's Coffee, Inc.

    N.D. California, filed by Shook, Hardy & Bacon LLP

    Court recordfor Munoz v. Peet's Coffee, Inc. (opens in a new tab)
  12. Accessibility

    Bullock v. Pascha Chocolate Company Inc.

    S.D. New York, filed by Shaked Law Group, P.C.. Attributed to New York

    Court recordfor Bullock v. Pascha Chocolate Company Inc. (opens in a new tab)
  13. Accessibility

    Stephenson v. National Beverage Corp.

    S.D. New York, filed by Zachary Scott Jones. Attributed to New York

    Court recordfor Stephenson v. National Beverage Corp. (opens in a new tab)
  14. Accessibility

    Cole v. Natural Foods, Inc.

    N.D. Illinois, filed by Equal Access Law Group PLLC. Attributed to Illinois

    Court recordfor Cole v. Natural Foods, Inc. (opens in a new tab)
  15. Accessibility

    Fernandez Martinez v. Werner Gourmet Meat Snacks, Inc.

    S.D. New York, filed by Kaufman Dolowich LLP. Attributed to New York

    Court recordfor Fernandez Martinez v. Werner Gourmet Meat Snacks, Inc. (opens in a new tab)
  16. Accessibility

    Hampton v. Terrapin Ridge Farms, LLC

    N.D. Illinois, filed by Equal Access Law Group, Pllc. Attributed to Illinois

    Court recordfor Hampton v. Terrapin Ridge Farms, LLC (opens in a new tab)
  17. Accessibility

    Liburd v. Hampton Chocolate Factory Llc

    M.D. Florida, filed by Equal Access Law Group PLLC. Attributed to Florida

    Court recordfor Liburd v. Hampton Chocolate Factory Llc (opens in a new tab)
  18. Tracking

    Sasaki v. Fay Nutrition, LLC.

    N.D. Illinois, filed by Bursor & Fisher P.A.

    Court recordfor Sasaki v. Fay Nutrition, LLC. (opens in a new tab)
  19. Accessibility

    Young v. Molson Coors Beverage Company USA LLC

    S.D. New York, filed by Gottlieb & Associates. Attributed to New York

    Court recordfor Young v. Molson Coors Beverage Company USA LLC (opens in a new tab)
  20. Accessibility

    Lopez v. Bluebonnet Nutrition Corporation

    S.D. New York, filed by Gottlieb & Associates. Attributed to New York

    Court recordfor Lopez v. Bluebonnet Nutrition Corporation (opens in a new tab)

Questions owners ask

Why food and beverage brands are sued over their websites, and how these numbers are built.
Why are food and beverage brands sued over their websites?
Because they run the tools complaints name: booking or contact forms without labels, image-heavy pages without descriptions, and marketing pixels or chat widgets that load before a visitor consents. Plaintiff firms search for those patterns and file in batches, which is why the same industry shows up repeatedly in a month.
How is the industry determined?
From the defendant's name and, when the complaint is available, its description of the business, mapped to one of twenty industry groups. Cases whose industry cannot be determined are counted in state totals but not on industry pages.
Does this list include state-court cases?
Partly. Federal filings are complete for what CourtListener publishes; state filings are added weekly from public sources with a link on each row. Every count carries that note.

Check your website before a firm does

The free scan loads five public pages, lists the trackers that fire before consent and the accessibility failures complaints cite, and matches them to filings against food and beverage brands.

Free, about a minute, no signup for your score.

Suitcast identifies risk indicators. It is not legal advice and does not determine compliance.