I received a letter from Andrew James Schertzer. What should I do?

Do not ignore it and do not reply before talking to a lawyer. Preserve the site as it is by taking dated screenshots and a scan, then fix what the letter cites so the record shows the changes and when they happened. The guides on this site explain what these letters usually say and how owners typically respond in the first week.

Is this every case the firm has filed?

No. The counts are federal dockets that name the firm in CourtListener's records, and the list shows the ones Suitcast has verified as website cases. State-court cases without a public source are not counted, so these numbers are a floor.

Why does the firm appear on this site?

Court filings are public records and the firm's name appears on each docket. Suitcast publishes counts and links to those records so business owners can see who is active in their state. It does not comment on the firm and it does not contact the businesses named as defendants.

Plaintiff law firm

Andrew James Schertzer

Andrew James Schertzer files website accessibility lawsuits against businesses. See where it files and what its complaints cite, then check whether your site has the same issues.

Federal dockets naming the firm

Last 90 days: 0
Last 12 months: 3
Most recent filing: Apr 21, 2026
Based in: Florida
Files over: Website accessibility

Counts include federal filings from CourtListener and curated state filings with sources. State-court coverage is partial.

The short answer

Andrew James Schertzer, based in Florida, is a plaintiff-side law firm named on 3 federal website accessibility lawsuit dockets in the last 12 months, 0 of them in the last 90 days, most recently on Apr 21, 2026. Most of its verified filings are against businesses in Florida. Its complaints most often cite Images have no description, Elements presented as images have no description, Icons and graphics have no description. Counts come from CourtListener docket records and refresh daily.

Where it files

The states and courts in its verified filings

Verified filings in the last 12 months, by the defendant's state and by the federal court the case was filed in.

Defendants by state

Verified filings, 12 months

Federal courts

Verified filings, 12 months

1District Court, S.D. Florida3 filings

Trend

Andrew James Schertzer filings, month by month

Verified filings linked to the firm, by the month they were filed. Firms file in batches, which is why months jump.

Website accessibility (ADA) Website tracking (CIPA)

December 2025 to November 2026, current month to date

What its complaints cite

The issues named in its complaints

Issues found in the complaint text of its verified filings. If your site has these, a letter from this firm would likely list them.

Issues cited

Complaints, 12 months

1Images have no description3 complaints
2Elements presented as images have no description3 complaints
3Icons and graphics have no description3 complaints
4Hidden content can still be reached by keyboard1 complaint

Court records

Latest verified filings by Andrew James Schertzer

Newest first. Every row links to the court record.

AccessibilityFiled Apr 21, 2026
MARZ v. MINT MOBILE, LLC
S.D. Florida, filed by Polsinelli PC. Attributed to Washington
Court recordfor MARZ v. MINT MOBILE, LLC (opens in a new tab)
AccessibilityFiled Mar 20, 2026
Irish v. GRNA HK OF FL LLC
S.D. Florida, filed by Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C.. Attributed to Florida
Court recordfor Irish v. GRNA HK OF FL LLC (opens in a new tab)
AccessibilityFiled Mar 13, 2026
Irish v. Gordon Food Service, Inc.
S.D. Florida, filed by Ogletree Deakins, PC. Attributed to Michigan
Court recordfor Irish v. Gordon Food Service, Inc. (opens in a new tab)

Questions owners ask

What to do with a letter from this firm, and what these numbers include.

I received a letter from Andrew James Schertzer. What should I do?: Do not ignore it and do not reply before talking to a lawyer. Preserve the site as it is by taking dated screenshots and a scan, then fix what the letter cites so the record shows the changes and when they happened. The guides on this site explain what these letters usually say and how owners typically respond in the first week.
Is this every case the firm has filed?: No. The counts are federal dockets that name the firm in CourtListener's records, and the list shows the ones Suitcast has verified as website cases. State-court cases without a public source are not counted, so these numbers are a floor.
Why does the firm appear on this site?: Court filings are public records and the firm's name appears on each docket. Suitcast publishes counts and links to those records so business owners can see who is active in their state. It does not comment on the firm and it does not contact the businesses named as defendants.

Keep going

Check your site for what this firm cites

The free scan loads five public pages and lists the trackers that fire before consent and the accessibility failures complaints cite, so the conversation with your lawyer starts with facts.

Suitcast identifies risk indicators. It is not legal advice and does not determine compliance.