Skip to content

Plaintiff law firm

Tauler Smith LLP, California

Tauler Smith LLP, California files website lawsuits against businesses. See where it files and what its complaints cite, then check whether your site has the same issues.

Free, about a minute, no signup for your score.

Federal dockets naming the firm

Last 90 days
1
Last 12 months
4
Most recent filing
Jul 28, 2026
Based in
Not listed
Files over
Counts include federal filings from CourtListener and curated state filings with sources. State-court coverage is partial.

The short answer

Tauler Smith LLP, California is a plaintiff-side law firm named on 4 federal website lawsuit dockets in the last 12 months, 1 of them in the last 90 days, most recently on Jul 28, 2026. Most of its verified filings are against businesses in New York. Counts come from CourtListener docket records and refresh daily.

Where it files

The states and courts in its verified filings

Verified filings in the last 12 months, by the defendant's state and by the federal court the case was filed in.

Defendants by state

Verified filings, 12 months
  1. 1New York3
  2. 2Delaware1

Federal courts

Verified filings, 12 months
  1. 1District Court, S.D. New York4

Trend

Tauler Smith LLP, California filings, month by month

Verified filings linked to the firm, by the month they were filed. Firms file in batches, which is why months jump.

Website accessibility (ADA) Website tracking (CIPA)

October 2025 to September 2026, current month to date

Industries

Industries it sues

Verified filings in the last 12 months by the defendant's industry.

By the defendant's industry

Verified filings, 12 months
  1. 1Entertainment and media1

Court records

Latest verified filings by Tauler Smith LLP, California

Newest first. Every row links to the court record.
  1. Tracking

    Price v. WeWork Inc.

    S.D. New York, filed by Tauler Smith LLP, California. Attributed to Delaware

    Court recordfor Price v. WeWork Inc. (opens in a new tab)
  2. Tracking

    Barajas v. Black Enterprise/Greenwich Street Corporate Growth Investors, LLC

    S.D. New York, filed by Tauler Smith LLP, California

    Court recordfor Barajas v. Black Enterprise/Greenwich Street Corporate Growth Investors, LLC (opens in a new tab)
  3. Tracking

    Barajas v. Black Enterprise

    S.D. New York, filed by Tauler Smith LLP, California

    Court recordfor Barajas v. Black Enterprise (opens in a new tab)
  4. Tracking

    Heiting v. Korangy Publishing Inc.

    S.D. New York, filed by Tauler Smith LLP, California

    Court recordfor Heiting v. Korangy Publishing Inc. (opens in a new tab)

Questions owners ask

What to do with a letter from this firm, and what these numbers include.
I received a letter from Tauler Smith LLP, California. What should I do?
Do not ignore it and do not reply before talking to a lawyer. Preserve the site as it is by taking dated screenshots and a scan, then fix what the letter cites so the record shows the changes and when they happened. The guides on this site explain what these letters usually say and how owners typically respond in the first week.
Is this every case the firm has filed?
No. The counts are federal dockets that name the firm in CourtListener's records, and the list shows the ones Suitcast has verified as website cases. State-court cases without a public source are not counted, so these numbers are a floor.
Why does the firm appear on this site?
Court filings are public records and the firm's name appears on each docket. Suitcast publishes counts and links to those records so business owners can see who is active in their state. It does not comment on the firm and it does not contact the businesses named as defendants.

Keep going

Check your site for what this firm cites

The free scan loads five public pages and lists the trackers that fire before consent and the accessibility failures complaints cite, so the conversation with your lawyer starts with facts.

Free, about a minute, no signup for your score.

Suitcast identifies risk indicators. It is not legal advice and does not determine compliance.