Website lawsuits by industry
Website lawsuits against entertainment and media
Verified filings against entertainment and media
Accessibility (ADA)
- 30 days
- 0
- 90 days
- 1
- 12 months
- 9
Tracking (CIPA)
- 30 days
- 0
- 90 days
- 2
- 12 months
- 18
Filings by month, last 12 months
The short answer
Suitcast counts 9 website accessibility lawsuits in the last 12 months and 18 website tracking lawsuits in the last 12 months against entertainment and media, verified from federal court records and sourced state filings. The most active plaintiff firm is Bursor & Fisher P.A.. Counts refresh daily and are a floor, because state-court coverage is partial.
Trend
Filings against entertainment and media, month by month
Website accessibility (ADA) Website tracking (CIPA)
October 2025 to September 2026, current month to dateWho files
Who files against entertainment and media
Most active plaintiff firms against entertainment and media
Verified filings, last 12 monthsRepeat plaintiffs against entertainment and media
Three or more filings, 12 months- 1Michael Hanson3 filings
Court records
Latest verified filings against entertainment and media
- AccessibilityCourt recordfor Foxworth v. Sheherazade Home & Events Corp. (opens in a new tab)
Foxworth v. Sheherazade Home & Events Corp.
S.D. New York, filed by Law Office of Jennifer E. Tucek, PC. Attributed to New York
- TrackingCourt recordfor Erakat v. The Intercept Media, Inc. (opens in a new tab)
Erakat v. The Intercept Media, Inc.
E.D. California, filed by Law Offices of Ross Cornell APC. Attributed to New York
- TrackingCourt recordfor Michael Hanson v. Heat Media, Inc. (opens in a new tab)
Michael Hanson v. Heat Media, Inc.
C.D. California
- TrackingCourt recordfor Michael Hanson v. Wise Publishing America, Inc. (opens in a new tab)
Michael Hanson v. Wise Publishing America, Inc.
C.D. California
- TrackingCourt recordfor Michael Hanson v. Tribune Publishing Company, LLC (opens in a new tab)
Michael Hanson v. Tribune Publishing Company, LLC
C.D. California
- TrackingCourt recordfor Erakat v. Axios Media Inc. (opens in a new tab)
Erakat v. Axios Media Inc.
N.D. California, filed by Law Offices of Ross Cornell APC
- TrackingCourt recordfor Daniel Vesely v. Static Media Inc. (opens in a new tab)
Daniel Vesely v. Static Media Inc.
C.D. California
- AccessibilityCourt recordfor Thorne v. Black Fish Media, L.L.C. (opens in a new tab)
Thorne v. Black Fish Media, L.L.C.
S.D. New York, filed by Gottlieb & Associates. Attributed to New York
- TrackingCourt recordfor White v. NBCUniversal Media, LLC (opens in a new tab)
White v. NBCUniversal Media, LLC
N.D. California, filed by Nathan & Associates, APC
- AccessibilityCourt recordfor Hussein v. Live Nation Entertainment, Inc. (opens in a new tab)
Hussein v. Live Nation Entertainment, Inc.
N.D. Illinois, filed by Equal Access Law Group PLLC. Attributed to Illinois
- TrackingCourt recordfor Mark Glinoga v. Sullivan Entertainment Inc (opens in a new tab)
Mark Glinoga v. Sullivan Entertainment Inc
C.D. California
- TrackingCourt recordfor Ostini v. IGN Entertainment, Inc. (opens in a new tab)
Ostini v. IGN Entertainment, Inc.
N.D. California, filed by Bryson Harris Suciu & DeMay PLLC
- TrackingCourt recordfor Penning v. Newsmax Media, Inc. (opens in a new tab)
Penning v. Newsmax Media, Inc.
N.D. California, filed by Conn Law, PC
- AccessibilityCourt recordfor SEE v. WERNER MEDIA PARTNERS, LLC (opens in a new tab)
SEE v. WERNER MEDIA PARTNERS, LLC
S.D. Indiana, filed by Equal Access Law Group PLLC. Attributed to Indiana
- TrackingCourt recordfor Ortiz v. Kenneth Cole Productions, Inc. (opens in a new tab)
Ortiz v. Kenneth Cole Productions, Inc.
N.D. California, filed by Gutride Safier LLP
- TrackingCourt recordfor Yee v. Fandango Media, LLC (opens in a new tab)
Yee v. Fandango Media, LLC
N.D. California, filed by Bursor & Fisher P.A.
- TrackingCourt recordfor Rada v. Versant Media, LLC (opens in a new tab)
Rada v. Versant Media, LLC
S.D. New York, filed by Levi & Korsinsky LLP
- TrackingCourt recordfor Heiting v. Korangy Publishing Inc. (opens in a new tab)
Heiting v. Korangy Publishing Inc.
S.D. New York, filed by Tauler Smith LLP, California
- AccessibilityCourt recordfor Rice v. Tarpley Music Company Inc (opens in a new tab)
Rice v. Tarpley Music Company Inc
E.D. Wisconsin, filed by Nye, Stirling, Hale, Miller & Sweet, LLP. Attributed to Wisconsin
- TrackingCourt recordfor Rodriguez v. Healthline Media, LLC (opens in a new tab)
Rodriguez v. Healthline Media, LLC
N.D. California, filed by Bursor & Fisher P.A.
- AccessibilityCourt recordfor Battle v. Universal Music Group, Inc. (opens in a new tab)
Battle v. Universal Music Group, Inc.
N.D. Illinois, filed by Horowitz Law, PLLC. Attributed to Illinois
- TrackingCourt recordfor Kent v. Dave & Buster's Entertainment, Inc. (opens in a new tab)
Kent v. Dave & Buster's Entertainment, Inc.
N.D. California, filed by Sidley Austin LLP
- AccessibilityCourt recordfor Jones v. Rudy's Music Soho, Inc. (opens in a new tab)
Jones v. Rudy's Music Soho, Inc.
S.D. New York. Attributed to New York
- AccessibilityCourt recordfor Jones v. SMK Entertainment Group, Inc. (opens in a new tab)
Jones v. SMK Entertainment Group, Inc.
S.D. New York. Attributed to New York
- AccessibilityCourt recordfor Liburd v. Armada Games, LLC (opens in a new tab)
Liburd v. Armada Games, LLC
M.D. Florida. Attributed to Florida
Other industries
Website lawsuits in other industries
- Dental practices
- Medical and health providers
- Restaurants and bars
- Retail and online stores
- Clothing and fashion brands
- Jewelry stores
- Salons, spas and beauty
- Gyms and fitness studios
- Hotels and travel
- Real estate
- Law firms
- Home services and contractors
- Auto dealers and repair
- Food and beverage brands
- Schools and education
- Nonprofits and religious organizations
- Banks, lenders and insurance
- Professional services
Questions owners ask
- Why are entertainment and media sued over their websites?
- Because they run the tools complaints name: booking or contact forms without labels, image-heavy pages without descriptions, and marketing pixels or chat widgets that load before a visitor consents. Plaintiff firms search for those patterns and file in batches, which is why the same industry shows up repeatedly in a month.
- How is the industry determined?
- From the defendant's name and, when the complaint is available, its description of the business, mapped to one of twenty industry groups. Cases whose industry cannot be determined are counted in state totals but not on industry pages.
- Does this list include state-court cases?
- Partly. Federal filings are complete for what CourtListener publishes; state filings are added weekly from public sources with a link on each row. Every count carries that note.
Check your website before a firm does
Suitcast identifies risk indicators. It is not legal advice and does not determine compliance.