Skip to content

Plaintiff law firm

Joseph & Norinsberg, LLC

Joseph & Norinsberg, LLC files website accessibility lawsuits against businesses. See where it files and what its complaints cite, then check whether your site has the same issues.

Free, about a minute, no signup for your score.

Federal dockets naming the firm

Last 90 days
23
Last 12 months
60
Most recent filing
Oct 30, 2026
Based in
New York
Files over
Website accessibility
Counts include federal filings from CourtListener and curated state filings with sources. State-court coverage is partial.

The short answer

Joseph & Norinsberg, LLC, based in New York, is a plaintiff-side law firm named on 60 federal website accessibility lawsuit dockets in the last 12 months, 23 of them in the last 90 days, most recently on Oct 30, 2026. Most of its verified filings are against businesses in New York. Its complaints most often cite Images have no description, Elements presented as images have no description, Icons and graphics have no description. Counts come from CourtListener docket records and refresh daily.

Where it files

The states and courts in its verified filings

Verified filings in the last 12 months, by the defendant's state and by the federal court the case was filed in.

Defendants by state

Verified filings, 12 months
  1. 1New York28
  2. 2California9
  3. 3Delaware5
  4. 4Utah3
  5. 5Florida2
  6. 6Illinois2
  7. 7Michigan2
  8. 8Texas2

Federal courts

Verified filings, 12 months
  1. 1District Court, S.D. New York60

Trend

Joseph & Norinsberg, LLC filings, month by month

Verified filings linked to the firm, by the month they were filed. Firms file in batches, which is why months jump.

Website accessibility (ADA) Website tracking (CIPA)

November 2025 to October 2026, current month to date

What its complaints cite

The issues named in its complaints

Issues found in the complaint text of its verified filings. If your site has these, a letter from this firm would likely list them.

Issues cited

Complaints, 12 months
  1. 1Images have no description45
  2. 2Elements presented as images have no description45
  3. 3Icons and graphics have no description45
  4. 4Custom form controls have no name38
  5. 5Form fields have no label38
  6. 6Custom buttons and menu items have no name35
  7. 7Buttons have no text35
  8. 8Screen reader hints are used on the wrong element34

Industries

Industries it sues

Verified filings in the last 12 months by the defendant's industry.

By the defendant's industry

Verified filings, 12 months
  1. 1Clothing and fashion brands4
  2. 2Salons, spas and beauty3
  3. 3Food and beverage brands3
  4. 4Medical and health providers1
  5. 5Retail and online stores1

Court records

Latest verified filings by Joseph & Norinsberg, LLC

Newest first. Every row links to the court record.
  1. Accessibility

    Johnson v. Uustar Corporation

    S.D. New York, filed by Joseph & Norinsberg, LLC. Attributed to New York

    Court recordfor Johnson v. Uustar Corporation (opens in a new tab)
  2. Accessibility

    Russo v. Marc Fisher, LLC

    S.D. New York, filed by Joseph & Norinsberg, LLC. Attributed to New York

    Court recordfor Russo v. Marc Fisher, LLC (opens in a new tab)
  3. Accessibility

    Diaz v. DVF Studio, LLC

    S.D. New York, filed by Joseph & Norinsberg, LLC. Attributed to Delaware

    Court recordfor Diaz v. DVF Studio, LLC (opens in a new tab)
  4. Accessibility

    Parker v. Coulter Ventures, LLC

    S.D. New York, filed by Joseph & Norinsberg, LLC. Attributed to New York

    Court recordfor Parker v. Coulter Ventures, LLC (opens in a new tab)
  5. Accessibility

    Parker v. Madewell, Inc.

    S.D. New York, filed by Joseph & Norinsberg, LLC. Attributed to New York

    Court recordfor Parker v. Madewell, Inc. (opens in a new tab)
  6. Accessibility

    Russo v. Pacha Soap Co.

    S.D. New York, filed by Joseph & Norinsberg, LLC. Attributed to Nebraska

    Court recordfor Russo v. Pacha Soap Co. (opens in a new tab)
  7. Accessibility

    McLean v. Alastin Skincare, Inc.

    S.D. New York, filed by Joseph & Norinsberg, LLC. Attributed to California

    Court recordfor McLean v. Alastin Skincare, Inc. (opens in a new tab)
  8. Accessibility

    Simmons v. Wolverine World Wide, Inc.

    S.D. New York, filed by Joseph & Norinsberg, LLC. Attributed to Michigan

    Court recordfor Simmons v. Wolverine World Wide, Inc. (opens in a new tab)
  9. Accessibility

    Simmons v. World Market, LLC

    S.D. New York, filed by Joseph & Norinsberg, LLC. Attributed to New York

    Court recordfor Simmons v. World Market, LLC (opens in a new tab)
  10. Accessibility

    Thomas v. JustSeven, LLC

    S.D. New York, filed by Joseph & Norinsberg, LLC. Attributed to New York

    Court recordfor Thomas v. JustSeven, LLC (opens in a new tab)
  11. Accessibility

    Simmons v. Cart.com, Inc.

    S.D. New York, filed by Joseph & Norinsberg, LLC. Attributed to New York

    Court recordfor Simmons v. Cart.com, Inc. (opens in a new tab)
  12. Accessibility

    Rushefsky v. ABC HoldCo, LLC

    S.D. New York, filed by Joseph & Norinsberg, LLC. Attributed to New York

    Court recordfor Rushefsky v. ABC HoldCo, LLC (opens in a new tab)
  13. Accessibility

    Cesario v. DavidsTea (USA), Inc.

    S.D. New York, filed by Joseph & Norinsberg, LLC. Attributed to New York

    Court recordfor Cesario v. DavidsTea (USA), Inc. (opens in a new tab)
  14. Accessibility

    Cesario v. Atelier Luxury Group, LLC

    S.D. New York, filed by Joseph & Norinsberg, LLC. Attributed to California

    Court recordfor Cesario v. Atelier Luxury Group, LLC (opens in a new tab)
  15. Accessibility

    Rivera v. Eden

    S.D. New York, filed by Joseph & Norinsberg, LLC. Attributed to New York

    Court recordfor Rivera v. Eden (opens in a new tab)
  16. Accessibility

    Diaz v. Mush Foods, Inc.

    S.D. New York, filed by Joseph & Norinsberg, LLC. Attributed to Illinois

    Court recordfor Diaz v. Mush Foods, Inc. (opens in a new tab)
  17. Accessibility

    Rivera v. Bop, LLC

    S.D. New York, filed by Joseph & Norinsberg, LLC. Attributed to Wisconsin

    Court recordfor Rivera v. Bop, LLC (opens in a new tab)
  18. Accessibility

    Rivera v. Oats Overnight, Inc.

    S.D. New York, filed by Joseph & Norinsberg, LLC. Attributed to Delaware

    Court recordfor Rivera v. Oats Overnight, Inc. (opens in a new tab)
  19. Accessibility

    Walker v. 18th and Walnut, LLC

    S.D. New York, filed by Joseph & Norinsberg, LLC. Attributed to New York

    Court recordfor Walker v. 18th and Walnut, LLC (opens in a new tab)
  20. Accessibility

    Russo v. Outdoor Adventure Kids, LLC

    S.D. New York, filed by Joseph & Norinsberg, LLC. Attributed to Utah

    Court recordfor Russo v. Outdoor Adventure Kids, LLC (opens in a new tab)
  21. Accessibility

    Simmons v. TheUBeauty.com, LLC

    S.D. New York, filed by Joseph & Norinsberg, LLC. Attributed to Delaware

    Court recordfor Simmons v. TheUBeauty.com, LLC (opens in a new tab)
  22. Accessibility

    Walker v. Pacific Sunwear of California, LLC

    S.D. New York, filed by Joseph & Norinsberg, LLC. Attributed to California

    Court recordfor Walker v. Pacific Sunwear of California, LLC (opens in a new tab)
  23. Accessibility

    Russo v. M&S Skin Care, LLC

    S.D. New York, filed by Joseph & Norinsberg, LLC. Attributed to New York

    Court recordfor Russo v. M&S Skin Care, LLC (opens in a new tab)
  24. Accessibility

    Thomas v. Fabula Holdings, Inc.

    S.D. New York, filed by Joseph & Norinsberg, LLC. Attributed to Delaware

    Court recordfor Thomas v. Fabula Holdings, Inc. (opens in a new tab)
  25. Accessibility

    Thomas v. MSS Beauty, Inc.

    S.D. New York, filed by Joseph & Norinsberg, LLC. Attributed to New York

    Court recordfor Thomas v. MSS Beauty, Inc. (opens in a new tab)

Questions owners ask

What to do with a letter from this firm, and what these numbers include.
I received a letter from Joseph & Norinsberg, LLC. What should I do?
Do not ignore it and do not reply before talking to a lawyer. Preserve the site as it is by taking dated screenshots and a scan, then fix what the letter cites so the record shows the changes and when they happened. The guides on this site explain what these letters usually say and how owners typically respond in the first week.
Is this every case the firm has filed?
No. The counts are federal dockets that name the firm in CourtListener's records, and the list shows the ones Suitcast has verified as website cases. State-court cases without a public source are not counted, so these numbers are a floor.
Why does the firm appear on this site?
Court filings are public records and the firm's name appears on each docket. Suitcast publishes counts and links to those records so business owners can see who is active in their state. It does not comment on the firm and it does not contact the businesses named as defendants.

Keep going

Check your site for what this firm cites

The free scan loads five public pages and lists the trackers that fire before consent and the accessibility failures complaints cite, so the conversation with your lawyer starts with facts.

Free, about a minute, no signup for your score.

Suitcast identifies risk indicators. It is not legal advice and does not determine compliance.