I received a letter from Pacific Trial Attorneys APC. What should I do?

Do not ignore it and do not reply before talking to a lawyer. Preserve the site as it is by taking dated screenshots and a scan, then fix what the letter cites so the record shows the changes and when they happened. The guides on this site explain what these letters usually say and how owners typically respond in the first week.

Is this every case the firm has filed?

No. The counts are federal dockets that name the firm in CourtListener's records, and the list shows the ones Suitcast has verified as website cases. State-court cases without a public source are not counted, so these numbers are a floor.

Why does the firm appear on this site?

Court filings are public records and the firm's name appears on each docket. Suitcast publishes counts and links to those records so business owners can see who is active in their state. It does not comment on the firm and it does not contact the businesses named as defendants.

Plaintiff law firm

Pacific Trial Attorneys APC

Pacific Trial Attorneys APC files website tracking lawsuits against businesses. See where it files and what its complaints cite, then check whether your site has the same issues.

Federal dockets naming the firm

Last 90 days: 0
Last 12 months: 2
Most recent filing: May 29, 2026
Based in: California
Files over: Website tracking

Counts include federal filings from CourtListener and curated state filings with sources. State-court coverage is partial.

The short answer

Pacific Trial Attorneys APC, based in California, is a plaintiff-side law firm named on 2 federal website tracking lawsuit dockets in the last 12 months, 0 of them in the last 90 days, most recently on May 29, 2026. Most of its verified filings are against businesses in California. Its complaints most often cite Google Analytics 4, Optimizely Web Experimentation, TikTok Pixel. Counts come from CourtListener docket records and refresh daily.

Where it files

The states and courts in its verified filings

Verified filings in the last 12 months, by the defendant's state and by the federal court the case was filed in.

Defendants by state

Verified filings, 12 months

Federal courts

Verified filings, 12 months

1District Court, S.D. California2 filings

Trend

Pacific Trial Attorneys APC filings, month by month

Verified filings linked to the firm, by the month they were filed. Firms file in batches, which is why months jump.

Website accessibility (ADA) Website tracking (CIPA)

November 2025 to October 2026, current month to date

What its complaints cite

The issues named in its complaints

Issues found in the complaint text of its verified filings. If your site has these, a letter from this firm would likely list them.

Issues cited

Complaints, 12 months

Industries

Industries it sues

Verified filings in the last 12 months by the defendant's industry.

By the defendant's industry

Verified filings, 12 months

1Banks, lenders and insurance1 filing

Court records

Latest verified filings by Pacific Trial Attorneys APC

Newest first. Every row links to the court record.

TrackingFiled May 29, 2026
Pettiford v. Gerber Life Insurance Company
S.D. California, filed by Kelley Drye and Warren LLP. Attributed to New York
Court recordfor Pettiford v. Gerber Life Insurance Company (opens in a new tab)
TrackingFiled Apr 2, 2026
Purscelley v. The Wisdom Companies, LLC
S.D. California, filed by Pacific Trial Attorneys APC. Attributed to California
Court recordfor Purscelley v. The Wisdom Companies, LLC (opens in a new tab)
TrackingFiled Sep 26, 2025
Rodriguez v. Terracycle, Inc.
S.D. California, filed by Gordon and Rees Scully Mansukhani. Attributed to Delaware
Court recordfor Rodriguez v. Terracycle, Inc. (opens in a new tab)
TrackingFiled Sep 21, 2025
Silvia Garcia v. Telecom Evolutions, LLC
C.D. California, filed by Pacific Trial Attorneys APC. Attributed to California
Court recordfor Silvia Garcia v. Telecom Evolutions, LLC (opens in a new tab)

Questions owners ask

What to do with a letter from this firm, and what these numbers include.

I received a letter from Pacific Trial Attorneys APC. What should I do?: Do not ignore it and do not reply before talking to a lawyer. Preserve the site as it is by taking dated screenshots and a scan, then fix what the letter cites so the record shows the changes and when they happened. The guides on this site explain what these letters usually say and how owners typically respond in the first week.
Is this every case the firm has filed?: No. The counts are federal dockets that name the firm in CourtListener's records, and the list shows the ones Suitcast has verified as website cases. State-court cases without a public source are not counted, so these numbers are a floor.
Why does the firm appear on this site?: Court filings are public records and the firm's name appears on each docket. Suitcast publishes counts and links to those records so business owners can see who is active in their state. It does not comment on the firm and it does not contact the businesses named as defendants.

Keep going

Check your site for what this firm cites

The free scan loads five public pages and lists the trackers that fire before consent and the accessibility failures complaints cite, so the conversation with your lawyer starts with facts.

Suitcast identifies risk indicators. It is not legal advice and does not determine compliance.