Website lawsuits by industry
Website lawsuits against banks, lenders and insurance
Verified filings against banks, lenders and insurance
Accessibility (ADA)
- 30 days
- 2
- 90 days
- 2
- 12 months
- 6
Tracking (CIPA)
- 30 days
- 0
- 90 days
- 0
- 12 months
- 15
Filings by month, last 12 months
The short answer
Suitcast counts 6 website accessibility lawsuits in the last 12 months and 15 website tracking lawsuits in the last 12 months against banks, lenders and insurance, verified from federal court records and sourced state filings. The most active plaintiff firm is Gottlieb & Associates. Counts refresh daily and are a floor, because state-court coverage is partial.
Trend
Filings against banks, lenders and insurance, month by month
Website accessibility (ADA) Website tracking (CIPA)
November 2025 to October 2026, current month to dateWho files
Who files against banks, lenders and insurance
Most active plaintiff firms against banks, lenders and insurance
Verified filings, last 12 months- 1Gottlieb & Associates2 filings
- 2Milberg, PLLC2 filings
- 3Baker & Hostetler LLP NYC1 filing
- 4Gutride Safier LLP1 filing
- 5Horowitz Law, PLLC1 filing
Repeat plaintiffs against banks, lenders and insurance
Three or more filings, 12 months- 1Dawkins4 filings
Court records
Latest verified filings against banks, lenders and insurance
- AccessibilityCourt recordfor Proveyer v. Estrella Insurance, Inc. (opens in a new tab)
Proveyer v. Estrella Insurance, Inc.
S.D. Florida, filed by Mendez Law Offices, PLLC. Attributed to Florida
- AccessibilityCourt recordfor Biberfeld v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (opens in a new tab)
Biberfeld v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
S.D. New York, filed by Baker & Hostetler LLP NYC. Attributed to Ohio
- TrackingCourt recordfor Dawkins v. Midfirst Bank (opens in a new tab)
Dawkins v. Midfirst Bank
E.D. California. Attributed to Oklahoma
- TrackingCourt recordfor Dawkins v. Preferred Bank (opens in a new tab)
Dawkins v. Preferred Bank
E.D. California. Attributed to California
- TrackingCourt recordfor Penning v. Farmers Insurance Company, Inc. (opens in a new tab)
Penning v. Farmers Insurance Company, Inc.
N.D. California, filed by Gutride Safier LLP. Attributed to California
- TrackingCourt recordfor Fedoroff v. Rocket Mortgage, LLC (opens in a new tab)
Fedoroff v. Rocket Mortgage, LLC
E.D. Michigan, filed by Goodwin Procter LLP. Attributed to Michigan
- TrackingCourt recordfor Dawkins v. East West Bank (opens in a new tab)
Dawkins v. East West Bank
E.D. California. Attributed to California
- TrackingCourt recordfor Pettiford v. Gerber Life Insurance Company (opens in a new tab)
Pettiford v. Gerber Life Insurance Company
S.D. California, filed by Kelley Drye and Warren LLP. Attributed to New York
- TrackingCourt recordfor Dawkins v. Citizens Financial Group, Inc. (opens in a new tab)
Dawkins v. Citizens Financial Group, Inc.
E.D. California. Attributed to Rhode Island
- TrackingCourt recordfor Yardley v. Erie Insurance Group (opens in a new tab)
Yardley v. Erie Insurance Group
S.D. California. Attributed to Pennsylvania
- TrackingCourt recordfor Yardley v. Ameriprise Financial, Inc. (opens in a new tab)
Yardley v. Ameriprise Financial, Inc.
S.D. California, filed by Swigart Law Group APC. Attributed to Minnesota
- TrackingCourt recordfor Erakat v. PNC Bank, National Assoc. (opens in a new tab)
Erakat v. PNC Bank, National Assoc.
E.D. California
- TrackingCourt recordfor Erakat v. U.S. Bank National Assoc. (opens in a new tab)
Erakat v. U.S. Bank National Assoc.
E.D. California
- AccessibilityCourt recordfor Knowles v. Capital City, LLC (opens in a new tab)
Knowles v. Capital City, LLC
S.D. New York, filed by Gottlieb & Associates. Attributed to New York
- AccessibilityCourt recordfor Randolph v. Toula JNY Investments, LLC (opens in a new tab)
Randolph v. Toula JNY Investments, LLC
N.D. Illinois, filed by Horowitz Law, PLLC. Attributed to Texas
- TrackingCourt recordfor Beltran v. Nationstar Mortgage LLC (opens in a new tab)
Beltran v. Nationstar Mortgage LLC
N.D. Texas, filed by Stranch Jennings & Garvey. Attributed to Texas
- AccessibilityCourt recordfor Tucker v. Charles Khan Investments LLC (opens in a new tab)
Tucker v. Charles Khan Investments LLC
S.D. New York, filed by Gottlieb & Associates. Attributed to Florida
- TrackingCourt recordfor Dana Hughes v. Valley National Bank (opens in a new tab)
Dana Hughes v. Valley National Bank
C.D. California. Attributed to New Jersey
- TrackingCourt recordfor Fedoroff v. Rocket Mortgage, LLC (opens in a new tab)
Fedoroff v. Rocket Mortgage, LLC
N.D. California, filed by Goodwin Procter. Attributed to Michigan
- TrackingCourt recordfor Bianca Johnston v. Capital One Financial Corporation (opens in a new tab)
Bianca Johnston v. Capital One Financial Corporation
C.D. California, filed by Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman
- AccessibilityCourt recordfor Morgan v. Notable Capital Management, L.L.C. (opens in a new tab)
Morgan v. Notable Capital Management, L.L.C.
S.D. New York, filed by Shaked Law Group, P.C.. Attributed to Delaware
- TrackingCourt recordfor Randy Kiyabu v. Global Federal Credit Union (opens in a new tab)
Randy Kiyabu v. Global Federal Credit Union
C.D. California. Attributed to Alaska
- TrackingCourt recordfor Diflumeri v. Raymond James Financial, Inc. (opens in a new tab)
Diflumeri v. Raymond James Financial, Inc.
M.D. Florida
- AccessibilityCourt recordfor Fiallo v. Cerce Capital, LLC (opens in a new tab)
Fiallo v. Cerce Capital, LLC
N.D. Illinois, filed by Nye, Stirling, Hale, Miller & Sweet, LLP. Attributed to Rhode Island
Other industries
Website lawsuits in other industries
- Dental practices
- Medical and health providers
- Restaurants and bars
- Retail and online stores
- Clothing and fashion brands
- Jewelry stores
- Salons, spas and beauty
- Gyms and fitness studios
- Hotels and travel
- Real estate
- Law firms
- Home services and contractors
- Auto dealers and repair
- Food and beverage brands
- Schools and education
- Nonprofits and religious organizations
- Entertainment and media
- Professional services
Questions owners ask
- Why are banks, lenders and insurance sued over their websites?
- Because they run the tools complaints name: booking or contact forms without labels, image-heavy pages without descriptions, and marketing pixels or chat widgets that load before a visitor consents. Plaintiff firms search for those patterns and file in batches, which is why the same industry shows up repeatedly in a month.
- How is the industry determined?
- From the defendant's name and, when the complaint is available, its description of the business, mapped to one of twenty industry groups. Cases whose industry cannot be determined are counted in state totals but not on industry pages.
- Does this list include state-court cases?
- Partly. Federal filings are complete for what CourtListener publishes; state filings are added weekly from public sources with a link on each row. Every count carries that note.
Check your website before a firm does
Suitcast identifies risk indicators. It is not legal advice and does not determine compliance.