Analytics from Google
Google Analytics 4 and website tracking lawsuits
What Suitcast knows about Google Analytics 4
Medium risk
- Type
- Analytics
- Complaints naming it, 12 months
- 10
Requests the scanner matches to it
- www.google-analytics.com
- analytics.google.com
- www.googletagmanager.com/gtag
- region1.google-analytics.com
- .google-analytics.com
The short answer
Google Analytics 4 is an analytics script from Google. Suitcast rates its risk under the California Invasion of Privacy Act, CIPA, as medium, because complaints describe scripts like it recording visitors before they consent. It is named in 10 verified complaints in the last 12 months. The fix is to load it only after a visitor accepts, or to remove it when it is not used.
Why complaints name it
Complaints cite it as sending a visitor's browsing activity and device details to Google before the visitor was asked.
The act allows $5,000 per violation, which is why firms look for scripts that run the moment a page opens.
The fix
How to stop Google Analytics 4 firing before consent
Google Tag Manager
Set the analytics_storage consent requirement.
Shopify
Install Google & YouTube through the app store so it follows the customer privacy banner.
WordPress
Load it through your consent plugin's Google Analytics integration.
How the scan checks this
- Loads your pages like a first visit. A real browser, nothing clicked, nothing accepted.
- Checks every request before the banner is answered. A request to www.google-analytics.com is matched to Google Analytics 4 and recorded with the millisecond it fired.
- Clicks reject and watches again. When the banner has a reject button, the scan presses it; if Google Analytics 4 keeps firing, the report says so.
Scanner rules and limits are on the methodology page.
Trend
Complaints naming Google Analytics 4, month by month
Website accessibility (ADA) Website tracking (CIPA)
October 2025 to September 2026, current month to dateIndustries
Industries sued over Google Analytics 4
By the defendant's industry
Verified filings, 12 monthsCourt records
Latest verified complaints naming Google Analytics 4
- TrackingCourt recordfor Sanchez v. QuinStreet, Inc. (opens in a new tab)
Sanchez v. QuinStreet, Inc.
S.D. California. Attributed to California
- TrackingCourt recordfor Pasquini v. Ziff Davis, Inc. (opens in a new tab)
Pasquini v. Ziff Davis, Inc.
N.D. California. Attributed to New York
- TrackingCourt recordfor Kizior v. Health Care Service Corporation (opens in a new tab)
Kizior v. Health Care Service Corporation
N.D. Illinois. Attributed to Illinois
- TrackingCourt recordfor Edward Lominchar v. TikTok USDS Joint Venture, LLC (opens in a new tab)
Edward Lominchar v. TikTok USDS Joint Venture, LLC
C.D. California. Attributed to California
- TrackingCourt recordfor Lombard v. Redfin Corporation (opens in a new tab)
Lombard v. Redfin Corporation
S.D. Florida, filed by Jared M Slade. Attributed to Washington
- TrackingCourt recordfor Pearson v. Hims & Hers Health, Inc. (opens in a new tab)
Pearson v. Hims & Hers Health, Inc.
N.D. California, filed by Schubert Jonckheer & Kolbe. Attributed to California
- TrackingCourt recordfor Maurer v. Edward D. Jones & Co., L.P. (opens in a new tab)
Maurer v. Edward D. Jones & Co., L.P.
E.D. Missouri, filed by Schubert and Jonckheer LLP. Attributed to Missouri
- TrackingCourt recordfor Howard Clark Jr v. Centene Corporation (opens in a new tab)
Howard Clark Jr v. Centene Corporation
C.D. California, filed by Maynard Nexsen Pc
- TrackingCourt recordfor Charles Orozco v. National Review, Inc. (opens in a new tab)
Charles Orozco v. National Review, Inc.
C.D. California. Attributed to New York
- TrackingCourt recordfor Erakat v. The Intercept Media, Inc. (opens in a new tab)
Erakat v. The Intercept Media, Inc.
E.D. California, filed by Law Offices of Ross Cornell APC. Attributed to New York
Same type
Other analytics scripts the scanner checks
Questions owners ask
- Is having Google Analytics 4 on my site illegal?
- No. The complaints do not claim the script is illegal; they claim it recorded a visitor before the visitor consented, or kept recording after the visitor declined. Loading Google Analytics 4 only after consent, or removing it when it is not used, is what removes the pattern the complaints describe.
- How do I know if Google Analytics 4 fires before consent on my site?
- Run the free scan. It loads your pages without clicking anything and checks every request that leaves the browser against its tracker catalog, recording the millisecond each match fired. If Google Analytics 4 appears, it fired before consent. When your banner has a reject button, the scan clicks it and reports whether the script kept firing.
- Where do the case counts on this page come from?
- From the complaint text of verified California Invasion of Privacy Act filings. When a complaint names this script, the case is linked to it. Complaints that are not yet available in the public record are not counted, so the number is a floor.
Keep going
- Every tracking script the scanner recognizesGrouped by type, with the risk and fix for each.
- Which scripts appear most in privacy lawsuitsWhat each records and how to gate it.
- I got a CIPA demand letter. What now?What the letter means and the first week.
- Website lawsuits in CaliforniaWhere most tracking suits are filed.
Does Google Analytics 4 fire before consent on your site?
Suitcast identifies risk indicators. It is not legal advice and does not determine compliance.