Skip to content

Plaintiff law firm

Bursor & Fisher P.A.

Bursor & Fisher P.A. files website tracking lawsuits against businesses. See where it files and what its complaints cite, then check whether your site has the same issues.

Free, about a minute, no signup for your score.

Federal dockets naming the firm

Last 90 days
2
Last 12 months
50
Most recent filing
Aug 12, 2026
Based in
California
Files over
Website tracking
Counts include federal filings from CourtListener and curated state filings with sources. State-court coverage is partial.

The short answer

Bursor & Fisher P.A., based in California, is a plaintiff-side law firm named on 50 federal website tracking lawsuit dockets in the last 12 months, 2 of them in the last 90 days, most recently on Aug 12, 2026. Most of its verified filings are against businesses in California. Its complaints most often cite Contentsquare, Google Ads conversion and remarketing tag, Google Analytics 4. Counts come from CourtListener docket records and refresh daily.

Where it files

The states and courts in its verified filings

Verified filings in the last 12 months, by the defendant's state and by the federal court the case was filed in.

Defendants by state

Verified filings, 12 months
  1. 1California42
  2. 2New York5
  3. 3Illinois2
  4. 4Florida1
  5. 5Missouri1
  6. 6Texas1

Federal courts

Verified filings, 12 months
  1. 1District Court, N.D. California32
  2. 2District Court, S.D. California5
  3. 3District Court, S.D. New York5
  4. 4District Court, C.D. California3
  5. 5District Court, E.D. California2
  6. 6District Court, N.D. Illinois2
  7. 7District Court, S.D. Florida1
  8. 8District Court, E.D. Missouri1

Trend

Bursor & Fisher P.A. filings, month by month

Verified filings linked to the firm, by the month they were filed. Firms file in batches, which is why months jump.

Website accessibility (ADA) Website tracking (CIPA)

October 2025 to September 2026, current month to date

What its complaints cite

The issues named in its complaints

Issues found in the complaint text of its verified filings. If your site has these, a letter from this firm would likely list them.

Issues cited

Complaints, 12 months
  1. 1Contentsquare1
  2. 2Google Ads conversion and remarketing tag1
  3. 3Google Analytics 41
  4. 4Google Tag Manager1
  5. 5LinkedIn Insight Tag1
  6. 6Meta Pixel1

Industries

Industries it sues

Verified filings in the last 12 months by the defendant's industry.

By the defendant's industry

Verified filings, 12 months
  1. 1Entertainment and media4
  2. 2Medical and health providers3
  3. 3Dental practices1
  4. 4Schools and education1
  5. 5Food and beverage brands1

Court records

Latest verified filings by Bursor & Fisher P.A.

Newest first. Every row links to the court record.
  1. Tracking

    Maurer v. Edward D. Jones & Co., L.P.

    E.D. Missouri, filed by Schubert and Jonckheer LLP. Attributed to Missouri

    Court recordfor Maurer v. Edward D. Jones & Co., L.P. (opens in a new tab)
  2. Tracking

    Kirkpatrick v. Crocs, Inc.

    N.D. California, filed by Bursor & Fisher, P.A.

    Court recordfor Kirkpatrick v. Crocs, Inc. (opens in a new tab)
  3. Tracking

    Lam v. Brooklinen, Inc.

    N.D. California, filed by Cozen O Connor

    Court recordfor Lam v. Brooklinen, Inc. (opens in a new tab)
  4. Tracking

    Wilson-Mcnulty v. Splitero Funding, Inc.

    S.D. California, filed by Bursor & Fisher, P.A.

    Court recordfor Wilson-Mcnulty v. Splitero Funding, Inc. (opens in a new tab)
  5. Tracking

    James v. Kalshi, Inc.

    S.D. California, filed by Bursor & Fisher, P.A.

    Court recordfor James v. Kalshi, Inc. (opens in a new tab)
  6. Tracking

    Skaggs v. X.AI, LLC

    N.D. California, filed by Willenken LLP

    Court recordfor Skaggs v. X.AI, LLC (opens in a new tab)
  7. Tracking

    Couture v. Openai Global, LLC

    S.D. California, filed by Jenner & Block LLP

    Court recordfor Couture v. Openai Global, LLC (opens in a new tab)
  8. Tracking

    Lim v. OpenAI Global, LLC

    N.D. California, filed by Bursor & Fisher, P.A.

    Court recordfor Lim v. OpenAI Global, LLC (opens in a new tab)
  9. Tracking

    Biljana Gallardo v. Redfin Corporation

    C.D. California, filed by Bursor & Fisher, P.A.

    Court recordfor Biljana Gallardo v. Redfin Corporation (opens in a new tab)
  10. Tracking

    Penning v. InsuranceZebra, Inc.

    W.D. Texas, filed by Vinson and Elkins LLP

    Court recordfor Penning v. InsuranceZebra, Inc. (opens in a new tab)
  11. Tracking

    Doe 1 v. Grow Care, Inc.

    S.D. New York, filed by Bursor & Fisher, P.A.

    Court recordfor Doe 1 v. Grow Care, Inc. (opens in a new tab)
  12. Tracking

    Zhu v. Equativ Inc.

    N.D. California, filed by Bursor & Fisher P.A.

    Court recordfor Zhu v. Equativ Inc. (opens in a new tab)
  13. Tracking

    Shah v. Edward D. Jones & Co., L.P.

    N.D. California, filed by Bursor & Fisher P.A.

    Court recordfor Shah v. Edward D. Jones & Co., L.P. (opens in a new tab)
  14. Tracking

    Babka v. United Legwear Company, LLC

    N.D. California, filed by Bursor & Fisher P.A.

    Court recordfor Babka v. United Legwear Company, LLC (opens in a new tab)
  15. Tracking

    Correia v. Lulu & Georgia, Inc.

    S.D. California, filed by Bursor & Fisher P.A.

    Court recordfor Correia v. Lulu & Georgia, Inc. (opens in a new tab)
  16. Tracking

    Gatoff v. AUDIOLOGY DISTRIBUTION, LLC

    S.D. Florida, filed by Bursor & Fisher P.A.

    Court recordfor Gatoff v. AUDIOLOGY DISTRIBUTION, LLC (opens in a new tab)
  17. Tracking

    Zhu v. Pinterest, Inc.

    N.D. California, filed by Bursor & Fisher, P.A.

    Court recordfor Zhu v. Pinterest, Inc. (opens in a new tab)
  18. Tracking

    Yee v. Snap, Inc.

    N.D. California, filed by Bursor & Fisher, P.A.

    Court recordfor Yee v. Snap, Inc. (opens in a new tab)
  19. Tracking

    Tsering v. ByteDance, Inc.

    N.D. California, filed by Bursor & Fisher, P.A.

    Court recordfor Tsering v. ByteDance, Inc. (opens in a new tab)
  20. Tracking

    Babbini v. ID5 Technology, Inc.

    N.D. California, filed by Bursor & Fisher, P.A.

    Court recordfor Babbini v. ID5 Technology, Inc. (opens in a new tab)
  21. Tracking

    Maurer v. Edward D. Jones & Co., L.P.

    N.D. California, filed by Bursor & Fisher P.A.

    Court recordfor Maurer v. Edward D. Jones & Co., L.P. (opens in a new tab)
  22. Tracking

    Gonzalez Merical v. The Joint Corp.

    E.D. California, filed by Pettit Kohn Ingrassia Lutz and Dolin

    Court recordfor Gonzalez Merical v. The Joint Corp. (opens in a new tab)
  23. Tracking

    Lutge v. Timex.com, Inc.

    N.D. California, filed by Bursor & Fisher, P.A.

    Court recordfor Lutge v. Timex.com, Inc. (opens in a new tab)
  24. Tracking

    Sharika Sawer v. Arlozorov9, Inc.

    S.D. New York, filed by Mullen Coughlin LLC

    Court recordfor Sharika Sawer v. Arlozorov9, Inc. (opens in a new tab)
  25. Tracking

    Buchholz v. Lean Rx, Inc.

    N.D. California, filed by Cooley LLP

    Court recordfor Buchholz v. Lean Rx, Inc. (opens in a new tab)

Questions owners ask

What to do with a letter from this firm, and what these numbers include.
I received a letter from Bursor & Fisher P.A.. What should I do?
Do not ignore it and do not reply before talking to a lawyer. Preserve the site as it is by taking dated screenshots and a scan, then fix what the letter cites so the record shows the changes and when they happened. The guides on this site explain what these letters usually say and how owners typically respond in the first week.
Is this every case the firm has filed?
No. The counts are federal dockets that name the firm in CourtListener's records, and the list shows the ones Suitcast has verified as website cases. State-court cases without a public source are not counted, so these numbers are a floor.
Why does the firm appear on this site?
Court filings are public records and the firm's name appears on each docket. Suitcast publishes counts and links to those records so business owners can see who is active in their state. It does not comment on the firm and it does not contact the businesses named as defendants.

Keep going

Check your site for what this firm cites

The free scan loads five public pages and lists the trackers that fire before consent and the accessibility failures complaints cite, so the conversation with your lawyer starts with facts.

Free, about a minute, no signup for your score.

Suitcast identifies risk indicators. It is not legal advice and does not determine compliance.