Plaintiff law firm
Shaked Law Group, P.C
Federal dockets naming the firm
- Last 90 days
- 1
- Last 12 months
- 4
- Most recent filing
- Oct 26, 2026
- Based in
- New York
- Files over
- Website accessibility
The short answer
Shaked Law Group, P.C, based in New York, is a plaintiff-side law firm named on 4 federal website accessibility lawsuit dockets in the last 12 months, 1 of them in the last 90 days, most recently on Oct 26, 2026. Most of its verified filings are against businesses in Delaware. Its complaints most often cite No way to skip past the menu, Clickable items are not real links or buttons, Images have no description. Counts come from CourtListener docket records and refresh daily.
Where it files
The states and courts in its verified filings
Defendants by state
Verified filings, 12 monthsFederal courts
Verified filings, 12 months- 1District Court, S.D. New York3 filings
- 2District Court, E.D. New York1 filing
Trend
Shaked Law Group, P.C filings, month by month
Website accessibility (ADA) Website tracking (CIPA)
December 2025 to November 2026, current month to dateWhat its complaints cite
The issues named in its complaints
Issues cited
Complaints, 12 months- 1No way to skip past the menu4 complaints
- 2Clickable items are not real links or buttons4 complaints
- 3Images have no description4 complaints
- 4Links have no text4 complaints
- 5Elements presented as images have no description4 complaints
- 6Icons and graphics have no description4 complaints
- 7Hidden content can still be reached by keyboard1 complaint
Industries
Industries it sues
By the defendant's industry
Verified filings, 12 monthsCourt records
Latest verified filings by Shaked Law Group, P.C
- AccessibilityCourt recordfor Black v. Rev Gum, LLC (opens in a new tab)
Black v. Rev Gum, LLC
S.D. New York, filed by Shaked Law Group, P.C.. Attributed to Texas
- AccessibilityCourt recordfor Anderson v. Doze Inc. (opens in a new tab)
Anderson v. Doze Inc.
E.D. New York, filed by Shaked Law Group, P.C.. Attributed to Florida
- AccessibilityCourt recordfor Bullock v. Pascha Chocolate Company Inc. (opens in a new tab)
Bullock v. Pascha Chocolate Company Inc.
S.D. New York, filed by Shaked Law Group, P.C.. Attributed to Delaware
- AccessibilityCourt recordfor Morgan v. Notable Capital Management, L.L.C. (opens in a new tab)
Morgan v. Notable Capital Management, L.L.C.
S.D. New York, filed by Shaked Law Group, P.C.. Attributed to Delaware
Questions owners ask
- I received a letter from Shaked Law Group, P.C. What should I do?
- Do not ignore it and do not reply before talking to a lawyer. Preserve the site as it is by taking dated screenshots and a scan, then fix what the letter cites so the record shows the changes and when they happened. The guides on this site explain what these letters usually say and how owners typically respond in the first week.
- Is this every case the firm has filed?
- No. The counts are federal dockets that name the firm in CourtListener's records, and the list shows the ones Suitcast has verified as website cases. State-court cases without a public source are not counted, so these numbers are a floor.
- Why does the firm appear on this site?
- Court filings are public records and the firm's name appears on each docket. Suitcast publishes counts and links to those records so business owners can see who is active in their state. It does not comment on the firm and it does not contact the businesses named as defendants.
Keep going
- All plaintiff firms, rankedWho files most across the country.
- Website lawsuits by stateCounts, firms and filings for all 50 states.
- How to test your website with only a keyboardTab order, fake buttons, skip links and traps in five minutes.
- How to add alt text on each platformWhere Shopify, WordPress, Squarespace and Wix keep image descriptions.
- ADA website lawsuit letter: what it meansThe first steps owners take.
- I got a CIPA demand letter. What now?What the letter means and what to do in the first week.
Check your site for what this firm cites
Suitcast identifies risk indicators. It is not legal advice and does not determine compliance.