Skip to content

Plaintiff law firm

Stein Saks PLLC

Stein Saks PLLC files website accessibility lawsuits against businesses. See where it files and what its complaints cite, then check whether your site has the same issues.

Free, about a minute, no signup for your score.

Federal dockets naming the firm

Last 90 days
0
Last 12 months
10
Most recent filing
Jul 8, 2026
Based in
Illinois
Files over
Website accessibility
Counts include federal filings from CourtListener and curated state filings with sources. State-court coverage is partial.

The short answer

Stein Saks PLLC, based in Illinois, is a plaintiff-side law firm named on 10 federal website accessibility lawsuit dockets in the last 12 months, 0 of them in the last 90 days, most recently on Jul 8, 2026. Most of its verified filings are against businesses in Wisconsin. Its complaints most often cite Hidden content can still be reached by keyboard, Clickable items are not real links or buttons, Images have no description. Counts come from CourtListener docket records and refresh daily.

Where it files

The states and courts in its verified filings

Verified filings in the last 12 months, by the defendant's state and by the federal court the case was filed in.

Defendants by state

Verified filings, 12 months
  1. 1Wisconsin10

Federal courts

Verified filings, 12 months
  1. 1District Court, E.D. Wisconsin10

Trend

Stein Saks PLLC filings, month by month

Verified filings linked to the firm, by the month they were filed. Firms file in batches, which is why months jump.

Website accessibility (ADA) Website tracking (CIPA)

December 2025 to November 2026, current month to date

What its complaints cite

The issues named in its complaints

Issues found in the complaint text of its verified filings. If your site has these, a letter from this firm would likely list them.

Issues cited

Complaints, 12 months
  1. 1Hidden content can still be reached by keyboard10
  2. 2Clickable items are not real links or buttons10
  3. 3Images have no description10
  4. 4Lists contain items that are not list items10
  5. 5List items sit outside a list10
  6. 6Elements presented as images have no description10
  7. 7Icons and graphics have no description10

Industries

Industries it sues

Verified filings in the last 12 months by the defendant's industry.

By the defendant's industry

Verified filings, 12 months
  1. 1Hotels and travel1
  2. 2Nonprofits and religious organizations1

Court records

Latest verified filings by Stein Saks PLLC

Newest first. Every row links to the court record.
  1. Accessibility

    Morris v. Van Vreede TV & Appliance Inc

    E.D. Wisconsin, filed by Stein Saks PLLC. Attributed to Wisconsin

    Court recordfor Morris v. Van Vreede TV & Appliance Inc (opens in a new tab)
  2. Accessibility

    Morris v. The Marcus Corporation

    E.D. Wisconsin, filed by Stein Saks PLLC. Attributed to Wisconsin

    Court recordfor Morris v. The Marcus Corporation (opens in a new tab)
  3. Accessibility

    Morris v. Waukesha Hospitality LLC

    E.D. Wisconsin, filed by Stein Saks PLLC. Attributed to Wisconsin

    Court recordfor Morris v. Waukesha Hospitality LLC (opens in a new tab)
  4. Accessibility

    Morris v. Mars Cheese Castle Inc

    E.D. Wisconsin, filed by Stein Saks PLLC. Attributed to Wisconsin

    Court recordfor Morris v. Mars Cheese Castle Inc (opens in a new tab)
  5. Accessibility

    Morris v. Spice Alliance LLC

    E.D. Wisconsin, filed by Stein Saks PLLC. Attributed to Wisconsin

    Court recordfor Morris v. Spice Alliance LLC (opens in a new tab)
  6. Accessibility

    Morris v. Revival Rugs Inc

    E.D. Wisconsin, filed by Stein Saks PLLC. Attributed to Wisconsin

    Court recordfor Morris v. Revival Rugs Inc (opens in a new tab)
  7. Accessibility

    Morris v. K-Swiss Inc

    E.D. Wisconsin, filed by Stein Saks PLLC. Attributed to Wisconsin

    Court recordfor Morris v. K-Swiss Inc (opens in a new tab)
  8. Accessibility

    Morris v. The Watch Connection Inc

    E.D. Wisconsin, filed by Stein Saks PLLC. Attributed to Wisconsin

    Court recordfor Morris v. The Watch Connection Inc (opens in a new tab)
  9. Accessibility

    Morris v. Luks Holdings LLC

    E.D. Wisconsin, filed by Stein Saks PLLC. Attributed to Wisconsin

    Court recordfor Morris v. Luks Holdings LLC (opens in a new tab)
  10. Accessibility

    Morris v. Bees Wrap LLC

    E.D. Wisconsin, filed by Stein Saks PLLC. Attributed to Wisconsin

    Court recordfor Morris v. Bees Wrap LLC (opens in a new tab)

Questions owners ask

What to do with a letter from this firm, and what these numbers include.
I received a letter from Stein Saks PLLC. What should I do?
Do not ignore it and do not reply before talking to a lawyer. Preserve the site as it is by taking dated screenshots and a scan, then fix what the letter cites so the record shows the changes and when they happened. The guides on this site explain what these letters usually say and how owners typically respond in the first week.
Is this every case the firm has filed?
No. The counts are federal dockets that name the firm in CourtListener's records, and the list shows the ones Suitcast has verified as website cases. State-court cases without a public source are not counted, so these numbers are a floor.
Why does the firm appear on this site?
Court filings are public records and the firm's name appears on each docket. Suitcast publishes counts and links to those records so business owners can see who is active in their state. It does not comment on the firm and it does not contact the businesses named as defendants.

Keep going

Check your site for what this firm cites

The free scan loads five public pages and lists the trackers that fire before consent and the accessibility failures complaints cite, so the conversation with your lawyer starts with facts.

Free, about a minute, no signup for your score.

Suitcast identifies risk indicators. It is not legal advice and does not determine compliance.