Skip to content

Website lawsuits by state

Website lawsuits in New Mexico

Two kinds of website lawsuit are filed against businesses every week: over tracking scripts that run before a visitor agrees, and over accessibility failures. See who was sued, then check your own site.

Free, about a minute, no signup for your score.

Verified filings attributed to New Mexico

Accessibility (ADA)

30 days
0
90 days
0
12 months
1

Tracking (CIPA)

30 days
0
90 days
0
12 months
0

Filings by month, last 12 months

Updated Oct 31, 2026How cases are verified

The short answer

Suitcast counts 1 website accessibility lawsuit in the last 12 months and 0 website tracking lawsuits in the last 12 months attributed to New Mexico, verified from federal court records and sourced state filings. The most active plaintiff firm is Equal Access Law Group PLLC. That is under the five filings needed for local statistics, so national figures appear alongside.

Across the country

Most website suits are filed in a few states

Federal website accessibility suits concentrate in a handful of venues, and tracking suits follow the defendant wherever it is based. New Mexico is outlined on the map.

Trend

Filings attributed to New Mexico, month by month

Accessibility and tracking filings stacked by the month they were filed. Firms file in batches, so a single month can jump.

Website accessibility (ADA) Website tracking (CIPA)

November 2025 to October 2026, current month to date

Who files

The firms and plaintiffs behind New Mexico's filings

A small group of plaintiff firms and repeat plaintiffs files most website lawsuits. Each firm page shows where else they file and what their complaints cite.

Most active plaintiff firms in New Mexico

Verified filings, last 12 months
  1. 1Equal Access Law Group PLLC1

Repeat plaintiffs in New Mexico

Three or more filings, 12 months

No repeat plaintiff here yet

Named plaintiffs appear once they have three or more verified filings in New Mexico in 12 months. Most website suits are filed by a small group of repeat plaintiffs.

Court records

Latest verified filings in New Mexico

Newest first. Every row links to the court record, so each count on this page can be checked.
  1. Accessibility

    Anderson v. Mimi Green LLC

    N.D. Illinois, filed by Equal Access Law Group PLLC

    Court recordfor Anderson v. Mimi Green LLC (opens in a new tab)

Questions owners ask

Short answers about website lawsuits in New Mexico. The methodology page explains every rule.
How many website lawsuits were filed in New Mexico in the last year?
Suitcast counts 1 verified website accessibility filings and 0 verified website tracking filings attributed to New Mexico in the last 12 months, from federal court records and sourced state filings. Coverage of state courts is partial, so the true number is higher.
Which law firms file website lawsuits in New Mexico?
The most active plaintiff firm in New Mexico in the last 12 months is Equal Access Law Group PLLC. The list on this page shows the top five with counts, and each firm page shows where else they file and what their complaints usually cite.
How is a case attributed to New Mexico?
Each case counts in one state. Accessibility cases are attributed to the defendant's state when the complaint names it, otherwise to the court's state. Tracking cases are attributed to the defendant's state, because about three in four are filed in California courts against companies located anywhere, including New Mexico.
What should a business owner do with this?
Check whether your own site has the issues these complaints name. The free scan takes about a minute and matches your findings against these filings, so you see which of them cite issues your site has right now.

Check your New Mexico website before a firm does

The free scan loads five public pages, lists the trackers that fire before consent and the accessibility failures complaints cite, and shows which of these filings name issues your site has.

Free, about a minute, no signup for your score.

Suitcast identifies risk indicators. It is not legal advice and does not determine compliance.