Skip to content

Website lawsuits by state

Website lawsuits in Maryland

Two kinds of website lawsuit are filed against businesses every week: over tracking scripts that run before a visitor agrees, and over accessibility failures. See who was sued, then check your own site.

Free, about a minute, no signup for your score.

Verified filings attributed to Maryland

Accessibility (ADA)

30 days
1
90 days
2
12 months
9

Tracking (CIPA)

30 days
0
90 days
0
12 months
2

Filings by month, last 12 months

Updated Oct 31, 2026How cases are verified

The short answer

Suitcast counts 9 website accessibility lawsuits in the last 12 months and 2 website tracking lawsuits in the last 12 months attributed to Maryland, verified from federal court records and sourced state filings. The most active plaintiff firm is Equal Access Law Group PLLC. Counts refresh daily and are a floor, because state-court coverage is partial.

Across the country

Where Maryland stands among the states

Tiles are shaded by verified filings on record for each state over the last 12 months. Maryland is outlined.

Busiest states

Filings on record, 12 months
  1. 1California211
  2. 2New York174
  3. 3Florida148
  4. 4Illinois89
  5. 5Delaware61
  6. 6Texas46
  7. 7New Jersey39
  8. 8Washington27

Trend

Filings attributed to Maryland, month by month

Accessibility and tracking filings stacked by the month they were filed. Firms file in batches, so a single month can jump.

Website accessibility (ADA) Website tracking (CIPA)

November 2025 to October 2026, current month to date

Who files

The firms and plaintiffs behind Maryland's filings

A small group of plaintiff firms and repeat plaintiffs files most website lawsuits. Each firm page shows where else they file and what their complaints cite.

Most active plaintiff firms in Maryland

Verified filings, last 12 months
  1. 1Equal Access Law Group PLLC3
  2. 2Gottlieb & Associates3
  3. 3Nye, Stirling, Hale, Miller & Sweet, LLP1
  4. 4Tauler Smith LLP1

Repeat plaintiffs in Maryland

Three or more filings, 12 months

No repeat plaintiff here yet

Named plaintiffs appear once they have three or more verified filings in Maryland in 12 months. Most website suits are filed by a small group of repeat plaintiffs.

Industries

Industries sued in Maryland

Verified filings in the last 12 months by the defendant's industry. Each industry page lists its own filings and firms.

By the defendant's industry

Verified filings, 12 months
  1. 1Hotels and travel1
  2. 2Restaurants and bars1
  3. 3Retail and online stores1

Court records

Latest verified filings in Maryland

Newest first. Every row links to the court record, so each count on this page can be checked.
  1. Accessibility

    Williams v. Round21, Inc.

    S.D. New York, filed by Gottlieb & Associates

    Court recordfor Williams v. Round21, Inc. (opens in a new tab)
  2. Accessibility

    Calcano v. Mill Supply Company, LLC

    S.D. New York, filed by Gottlieb & Associates

    Court recordfor Calcano v. Mill Supply Company, LLC (opens in a new tab)
  3. Tracking

    Kent v. Retail Services & Systems, Inc.

    N.D. California

    Court recordfor Kent v. Retail Services & Systems, Inc. (opens in a new tab)
  4. Accessibility

    Odonnell v. DiamondRock Hospitality Company

    D. Massachusetts

    Court recordfor Odonnell v. DiamondRock Hospitality Company (opens in a new tab)
  5. Accessibility

    O'Donnell v. Swahili Village Bar & Restaurant Boma LLC

    D. Massachusetts

    Court recordfor O'Donnell v. Swahili Village Bar & Restaurant Boma LLC (opens in a new tab)
  6. Accessibility

    Pittman v. Plaza Artist Materials Of The Mid-Atlantic, Inc.

    N.D. Illinois, filed by Schueler, Dallavo & Casieri

    Court recordfor Pittman v. Plaza Artist Materials Of The Mid-Atlantic, Inc. (opens in a new tab)
  7. Accessibility

    Evans v. Worldwide Golf Shops LLC

    N.D. Illinois, filed by Equal Access Law Group PLLC

    Court recordfor Evans v. Worldwide Golf Shops LLC (opens in a new tab)
  8. Accessibility

    Bishop v. Ambi Enterprises, LLC

    S.D. New York, filed by Gottlieb & Associates

    Court recordfor Bishop v. Ambi Enterprises, LLC (opens in a new tab)
  9. Accessibility

    Smith v. Grand Brands, Inc.

    N.D. Illinois, filed by Alston & Bird LLP

    Court recordfor Smith v. Grand Brands, Inc. (opens in a new tab)
  10. Tracking

    Claire de Roulhac v. CareMetx, LLC

    C.D. California, filed by Tauler Smith LLP

    Court recordfor Claire de Roulhac v. CareMetx, LLC (opens in a new tab)
  11. Accessibility

    Henry v. Bespoke Color Company, LLC

    N.D. Illinois, filed by Equal Access Law Group PLLC

    Court recordfor Henry v. Bespoke Color Company, LLC (opens in a new tab)
  12. Accessibility

    Richard Paul Merrell v. Tapestry, Inc.

    C.D. California

    Court recordfor Richard Paul Merrell v. Tapestry, Inc. (opens in a new tab)

Questions owners ask

Short answers about website lawsuits in Maryland. The methodology page explains every rule.
How many website lawsuits were filed in Maryland in the last year?
Suitcast counts 9 verified website accessibility filings and 2 verified website tracking filings attributed to Maryland in the last 12 months, from federal court records and sourced state filings. Coverage of state courts is partial, so the true number is higher.
Which law firms file website lawsuits in Maryland?
The most active plaintiff firm in Maryland in the last 12 months is Equal Access Law Group PLLC. The list on this page shows the top five with counts, and each firm page shows where else they file and what their complaints usually cite.
How is a case attributed to Maryland?
Each case counts in one state. Accessibility cases are attributed to the defendant's state when the complaint names it, otherwise to the court's state. Tracking cases are attributed to the defendant's state, because about three in four are filed in California courts against companies located anywhere, including Maryland.
What should a business owner do with this?
Check whether your own site has the issues these complaints name. The free scan takes about a minute and matches your findings against these filings, so you see which of them cite issues your site has right now.

Keep going

Check your Maryland website before a firm does

The free scan loads five public pages, lists the trackers that fire before consent and the accessibility failures complaints cite, and shows which of these filings name issues your site has.

Free, about a minute, no signup for your score.

Suitcast identifies risk indicators. It is not legal advice and does not determine compliance.