Skip to content

Website lawsuits by state

Website lawsuits in Nevada

Two kinds of website lawsuit are filed against businesses every week: over tracking scripts that run before a visitor agrees, and over accessibility failures. See who was sued, then check your own site.

Free, about a minute, no signup for your score.

Verified filings attributed to Nevada

Accessibility (ADA)

30 days
0
90 days
0
12 months
5

Tracking (CIPA)

30 days
0
90 days
1
12 months
5

Filings by month, last 12 months

Updated Oct 31, 2026How cases are verified

The short answer

Suitcast counts 5 website accessibility lawsuits in the last 12 months and 5 website tracking lawsuits in the last 12 months attributed to Nevada, verified from federal court records and sourced state filings. The most active plaintiff firm is Gottlieb & Associates. Counts refresh daily and are a floor, because state-court coverage is partial.

Across the country

Where Nevada stands among the states

Tiles are shaded by verified filings on record for each state over the last 12 months. Nevada is outlined.

Trend

Filings attributed to Nevada, month by month

Accessibility and tracking filings stacked by the month they were filed. Firms file in batches, so a single month can jump.

Website accessibility (ADA) Website tracking (CIPA)

November 2025 to October 2026, current month to date

Who files

The firms and plaintiffs behind Nevada's filings

A small group of plaintiff firms and repeat plaintiffs files most website lawsuits. Each firm page shows where else they file and what their complaints cite.

Repeat plaintiffs in Nevada

Three or more filings, 12 months

No repeat plaintiff here yet

Named plaintiffs appear once they have three or more verified filings in Nevada in 12 months. Most website suits are filed by a small group of repeat plaintiffs.

Industries

Industries sued in Nevada

Verified filings in the last 12 months by the defendant's industry. Each industry page lists its own filings and firms.

By the defendant's industry

Verified filings, 12 months
  1. 1Salons, spas and beauty2
  2. 2Retail and online stores1

Court records

Latest verified filings in Nevada

Newest first. Every row links to the court record, so each count on this page can be checked.
  1. Tracking

    Shipley v. Zuffa, LLC

    N.D. California

    Court recordfor Shipley v. Zuffa, LLC (opens in a new tab)
  2. Accessibility

    Russo v. Adornmonde, Inc.

    S.D. New York, filed by Joseph & Norinsberg, LLC

    Court recordfor Russo v. Adornmonde, Inc. (opens in a new tab)
  3. Tracking

    Dana Hughes v. DraftKings Inc.

    C.D. California

    Court recordfor Dana Hughes v. DraftKings Inc. (opens in a new tab)
  4. Accessibility

    Jackson v. The Spa and Sauna Co. LLC

    N.D. Illinois, filed by Nye, Stirling, Hale, Miller & Sweet, LLP

    Court recordfor Jackson v. The Spa and Sauna Co. LLC (opens in a new tab)
  5. Tracking

    Nacarino v. Wynn Resorts Holdings, LLC

    N.D. California

    Court recordfor Nacarino v. Wynn Resorts Holdings, LLC (opens in a new tab)
  6. Accessibility

    Ford v. Firecut LLC

    N.D. Illinois, filed by Equal Access Law Group PLLC

    Court recordfor Ford v. Firecut LLC (opens in a new tab)
  7. Accessibility

    Bishop v. CPAP Store USA LLC

    S.D. New York, filed by Gottlieb & Associates

    Court recordfor Bishop v. CPAP Store USA LLC (opens in a new tab)
  8. Tracking

    Andrew Cheung v. Slickdeals, LLC

    C.D. California, filed by Ahdoot & Wolfson, PC

    Court recordfor Andrew Cheung v. Slickdeals, LLC (opens in a new tab)
  9. Accessibility

    Murphy v. The Hair Doc Bass Brushes Inc.

    S.D. New York, filed by Gottlieb & Associates

    Court recordfor Murphy v. The Hair Doc Bass Brushes Inc. (opens in a new tab)
  10. Tracking

    McFarlane v. Zappos.com LLC

    N.D. California, filed by Bursor & Fisher P.A.

    Court recordfor McFarlane v. Zappos.com LLC (opens in a new tab)
  11. Accessibility

    Lopez v. Geo Management Corporation

    S.D. New York, filed by Gottlieb & Associates

    Court recordfor Lopez v. Geo Management Corporation (opens in a new tab)
  12. Accessibility

    GRANT v. DRVITA, INC.

    S.D. Indiana, filed by Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani, LLP

    Court recordfor GRANT v. DRVITA, INC. (opens in a new tab)
  13. Tracking

    Vasquez v. Venetian Las Vegas Gaming, LLC

    N.D. California, filed by Bursor & Fisher P.A.

    Court recordfor Vasquez v. Venetian Las Vegas Gaming, LLC (opens in a new tab)

Questions owners ask

Short answers about website lawsuits in Nevada. The methodology page explains every rule.
How many website lawsuits were filed in Nevada in the last year?
Suitcast counts 5 verified website accessibility filings and 5 verified website tracking filings attributed to Nevada in the last 12 months, from federal court records and sourced state filings. Coverage of state courts is partial, so the true number is higher.
Which law firms file website lawsuits in Nevada?
The most active plaintiff firm in Nevada in the last 12 months is Gottlieb & Associates. The list on this page shows the top five with counts, and each firm page shows where else they file and what their complaints usually cite.
How is a case attributed to Nevada?
Each case counts in one state. Accessibility cases are attributed to the defendant's state when the complaint names it, otherwise to the court's state. Tracking cases are attributed to the defendant's state, because about three in four are filed in California courts against companies located anywhere, including Nevada.
What should a business owner do with this?
Check whether your own site has the issues these complaints name. The free scan takes about a minute and matches your findings against these filings, so you see which of them cite issues your site has right now.

Check your Nevada website before a firm does

The free scan loads five public pages, lists the trackers that fire before consent and the accessibility failures complaints cite, and shows which of these filings name issues your site has.

Free, about a minute, no signup for your score.

Suitcast identifies risk indicators. It is not legal advice and does not determine compliance.