Skip to content

Plaintiff law firm

Horowitz Law, PLLC

Horowitz Law, PLLC files website accessibility lawsuits against businesses. See where it files and what its complaints cite, then check whether your site has the same issues.

Free, about a minute, no signup for your score.

Federal dockets naming the firm

Last 90 days
3
Last 12 months
28
Most recent filing
Oct 20, 2026
Based in
Illinois
Files over
Website accessibility
Counts include federal filings from CourtListener and curated state filings with sources. State-court coverage is partial.

The short answer

Horowitz Law, PLLC, based in Illinois, is a plaintiff-side law firm named on 28 federal website accessibility lawsuit dockets in the last 12 months, 3 of them in the last 90 days, most recently on Oct 20, 2026. Most of its verified filings are against businesses in California. Its complaints most often cite Clickable items are not real links or buttons, Images have no description, Elements presented as images have no description. Counts come from CourtListener docket records and refresh daily.

Where it files

The states and courts in its verified filings

Verified filings in the last 12 months, by the defendant's state and by the federal court the case was filed in.

Defendants by state

Verified filings, 12 months
  1. 1California5
  2. 2New Jersey3
  3. 3New York3
  4. 4Texas3
  5. 5Utah3
  6. 6Florida2
  7. 7Ohio2
  8. 8Colorado1

Federal courts

Verified filings, 12 months
  1. 1District Court, N.D. Illinois26
  2. 2District Court, S.D. New York2

Trend

Horowitz Law, PLLC filings, month by month

Verified filings linked to the firm, by the month they were filed. Firms file in batches, which is why months jump.

Website accessibility (ADA) Website tracking (CIPA)

November 2025 to October 2026, current month to date

What its complaints cite

The issues named in its complaints

Issues found in the complaint text of its verified filings. If your site has these, a letter from this firm would likely list them.

Issues cited

Complaints, 12 months
  1. 1Clickable items are not real links or buttons28
  2. 2Images have no description28
  3. 3Elements presented as images have no description28
  4. 4Icons and graphics have no description28
  5. 5Keyboard order has been forced out of sequence23
  6. 6Links have no text19
  7. 7No way to skip past the menu11
  8. 8Elements use roles that do not exist10

Industries

Industries it sues

Verified filings in the last 12 months by the defendant's industry.

By the defendant's industry

Verified filings, 12 months
  1. 1Salons, spas and beauty1
  2. 2Entertainment and media1
  3. 3Banks, lenders and insurance1
  4. 4Restaurants and bars1

Court records

Latest verified filings by Horowitz Law, PLLC

Newest first. Every row links to the court record.
  1. Accessibility

    Randolph v. Schwabe North America, Incorporated

    N.D. Illinois, filed by Horowitz Law, PLLC. Attributed to Wisconsin

    Court recordfor Randolph v. Schwabe North America, Incorporated (opens in a new tab)
  2. Accessibility

    Battle v. Empava Appliances Inc.

    N.D. Illinois, filed by Horowitz Law, PLLC. Attributed to California

    Court recordfor Battle v. Empava Appliances Inc. (opens in a new tab)
  3. Accessibility

    Randolph v. Bradshaw Taylor USA Inc.

    N.D. Illinois, filed by Horowitz Law, PLLC. Attributed to Colorado

    Court recordfor Randolph v. Bradshaw Taylor USA Inc. (opens in a new tab)
  4. Accessibility

    Battle v. Movado Group, Inc.

    N.D. Illinois, filed by Horowitz Law, PLLC. Attributed to New Jersey

    Court recordfor Battle v. Movado Group, Inc. (opens in a new tab)
  5. Accessibility

    Battle v. New West Knifeworks, LLC

    N.D. Illinois, filed by Horowitz Law, PLLC. Attributed to Wyoming

    Court recordfor Battle v. New West Knifeworks, LLC (opens in a new tab)
  6. Accessibility

    Randolph v. Portmantos Inc.

    N.D. Illinois, filed by Horowitz Law, PLLC. Attributed to New Jersey

    Court recordfor Randolph v. Portmantos Inc. (opens in a new tab)
  7. Accessibility

    Randolph v. Calendars.com L.L.C.

    N.D. Illinois, filed by Horowitz Law, PLLC. Attributed to Texas

    Court recordfor Randolph v. Calendars.com L.L.C. (opens in a new tab)
  8. Accessibility

    Battle v. CPO Commerce, LLC

    N.D. Illinois, filed by Horowitz Law, PLLC. Attributed to California

    Court recordfor Battle v. CPO Commerce, LLC (opens in a new tab)
  9. Accessibility

    Randolph v. Kitchen Resource Direct LLC

    N.D. Illinois, filed by Horowitz Law, PLLC. Attributed to Florida

    Court recordfor Randolph v. Kitchen Resource Direct LLC (opens in a new tab)
  10. Accessibility

    Randolph v. Dime Beauty Co. LLC

    N.D. Illinois, filed by Horowitz Law, PLLC. Attributed to Utah

    Court recordfor Randolph v. Dime Beauty Co. LLC (opens in a new tab)
  11. Accessibility

    Randolph v. Toula JNY Investments, LLC

    N.D. Illinois, filed by Horowitz Law, PLLC. Attributed to Texas

    Court recordfor Randolph v. Toula JNY Investments, LLC (opens in a new tab)
  12. Accessibility

    Battle v. The Numero Group LLC

    N.D. Illinois, filed by Horowitz Law, PLLC. Attributed to Illinois

    Court recordfor Battle v. The Numero Group LLC (opens in a new tab)
  13. Accessibility

    Zhang v. Bed-Stuy Fish Fry Inc.

    S.D. New York, filed by Horowitz Law, PLLC. Attributed to New York

    Court recordfor Zhang v. Bed-Stuy Fish Fry Inc. (opens in a new tab)
  14. Accessibility

    Zhang v. Hands of Hope P.T., P.C.

    S.D. New York, filed by Horowitz Law, PLLC. Attributed to New Jersey

    Court recordfor Zhang v. Hands of Hope P.T., P.C. (opens in a new tab)
  15. Accessibility

    Battle v. Fulton and Roark LLC

    N.D. Illinois, filed by K&L Gates LLP. Attributed to North Carolina

    Court recordfor Battle v. Fulton and Roark LLC (opens in a new tab)
  16. Accessibility

    Battle v. Papaya Organics Limited Liability Company

    N.D. Illinois, filed by Horowitz Law, PLLC. Attributed to Texas

    Court recordfor Battle v. Papaya Organics Limited Liability Company (opens in a new tab)
  17. Accessibility

    Battle v. Rowmark LLC

    N.D. Illinois, filed by O'Hagan Meyer, LLC. Attributed to Ohio

    Court recordfor Battle v. Rowmark LLC (opens in a new tab)
  18. Accessibility

    Battle v. Jack Lilly LLC

    N.D. Illinois, filed by Horowitz Law, PLLC. Attributed to Utah

    Court recordfor Battle v. Jack Lilly LLC (opens in a new tab)
  19. Accessibility

    Battle v. Barebones Systems, LLC

    N.D. Illinois, filed by Horowitz Law, PLLC. Attributed to Utah

    Court recordfor Battle v. Barebones Systems, LLC (opens in a new tab)
  20. Accessibility

    Randolph v. Kate Mcleod, Inc.

    N.D. Illinois, filed by Horowitz Law, PLLC. Attributed to New York

    Court recordfor Randolph v. Kate Mcleod, Inc. (opens in a new tab)
  21. Accessibility

    Randolph v. Hargraves Online Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

    N.D. Illinois, filed by Horowitz Law, PLLC. Attributed to New York

    Court recordfor Randolph v. Hargraves Online Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (opens in a new tab)
  22. Accessibility

    Randolph v. High Country, Inc.

    N.D. Illinois, filed by Horowitz Law, PLLC. Attributed to Georgia

    Court recordfor Randolph v. High Country, Inc. (opens in a new tab)
  23. Accessibility

    Randolph v. CompSource, Inc.

    N.D. Illinois, filed by Horowitz Law, PLLC. Attributed to Ohio

    Court recordfor Randolph v. CompSource, Inc. (opens in a new tab)
  24. Accessibility

    Randolph v. Ugmonk Inc.

    N.D. Illinois, filed by Horowitz Law, PLLC. Attributed to Pennsylvania

    Court recordfor Randolph v. Ugmonk Inc. (opens in a new tab)
  25. Accessibility

    Randolph v. Levenger Company

    N.D. Illinois, filed by Horowitz Law, PLLC. Attributed to Florida

    Court recordfor Randolph v. Levenger Company (opens in a new tab)

Questions owners ask

What to do with a letter from this firm, and what these numbers include.
I received a letter from Horowitz Law, PLLC. What should I do?
Do not ignore it and do not reply before talking to a lawyer. Preserve the site as it is by taking dated screenshots and a scan, then fix what the letter cites so the record shows the changes and when they happened. The guides on this site explain what these letters usually say and how owners typically respond in the first week.
Is this every case the firm has filed?
No. The counts are federal dockets that name the firm in CourtListener's records, and the list shows the ones Suitcast has verified as website cases. State-court cases without a public source are not counted, so these numbers are a floor.
Why does the firm appear on this site?
Court filings are public records and the firm's name appears on each docket. Suitcast publishes counts and links to those records so business owners can see who is active in their state. It does not comment on the firm and it does not contact the businesses named as defendants.

Keep going

Check your site for what this firm cites

The free scan loads five public pages and lists the trackers that fire before consent and the accessibility failures complaints cite, so the conversation with your lawyer starts with facts.

Free, about a minute, no signup for your score.

Suitcast identifies risk indicators. It is not legal advice and does not determine compliance.