Skip to content

Plaintiff law firm

Nye, Stirling, Hale, Miller & Sweet, LLP

Nye, Stirling, Hale, Miller & Sweet, LLP files website accessibility lawsuits against businesses. See where it files and what its complaints cite, then check whether your site has the same issues.

Free, about a minute, no signup for your score.

Federal dockets naming the firm

Last 90 days
4
Last 12 months
49
Most recent filing
Aug 5, 2026
Based in
Illinois
Files over
Website accessibility
Counts include federal filings from CourtListener and curated state filings with sources. State-court coverage is partial.

The short answer

Nye, Stirling, Hale, Miller & Sweet, LLP, based in Illinois, is a plaintiff-side law firm named on 49 federal website accessibility lawsuit dockets in the last 12 months, 4 of them in the last 90 days, most recently on Aug 5, 2026. Most of its verified filings are against businesses in Illinois. Counts come from CourtListener docket records and refresh daily.

Where it files

The states and courts in its verified filings

Verified filings in the last 12 months, by the defendant's state and by the federal court the case was filed in.

Defendants by state

Verified filings, 12 months
  1. 1Illinois24
  2. 2Wisconsin12
  3. 3Indiana8
  4. 4Pennsylvania5
  5. 5North Carolina1

Federal courts

Verified filings, 12 months
  1. 1District Court, N.D. Illinois24
  2. 2District Court, E.D. Wisconsin13
  3. 3District Court, S.D. Indiana8
  4. 4District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania5

Trend

Nye, Stirling, Hale, Miller & Sweet, LLP filings, month by month

Verified filings linked to the firm, by the month they were filed. Firms file in batches, which is why months jump.

Website accessibility (ADA) Website tracking (CIPA)

October 2025 to September 2026, current month to date

Industries

Industries it sues

Verified filings in the last 12 months by the defendant's industry.

By the defendant's industry

Verified filings, 12 months
  1. 1Clothing and fashion brands3
  2. 2Salons, spas and beauty3
  3. 3Entertainment and media1
  4. 4Banks, lenders and insurance1
  5. 5Food and beverage brands1
  6. 6Medical and health providers1
  7. 7Retail and online stores1

Court records

Latest verified filings by Nye, Stirling, Hale, Miller & Sweet, LLP

Newest first. Every row links to the court record.
  1. Accessibility

    Rice v. Mayo Retail Internet Services LLC

    E.D. Wisconsin, filed by Nye, Stirling, Hale, Miller & Sweet, LLP. Attributed to North Carolina

    Court recordfor Rice v. Mayo Retail Internet Services LLC (opens in a new tab)
  2. Accessibility

    Booker v. Merz Apothecary, Inc.

    N.D. Illinois, filed by Nye, Stirling, Hale, Miller & Sweet, LLP. Attributed to Illinois

    Court recordfor Booker v. Merz Apothecary, Inc. (opens in a new tab)
  3. Accessibility

    BOOKER v. TWININGS NORTH AMERICA, INC.

    W.D. Pennsylvania, filed by Nye, Stirling, Hale, Miller & Sweet, LLP. Attributed to Pennsylvania

    Court recordfor BOOKER v. TWININGS NORTH AMERICA, INC. (opens in a new tab)
  4. Accessibility

    SUCHENKO v. SKIN PHARM, LLC

    W.D. Pennsylvania, filed by Nye, Stirling, Hale, Miller & Sweet, LLP. Attributed to Pennsylvania

    Court recordfor SUCHENKO v. SKIN PHARM, LLC (opens in a new tab)
  5. Accessibility

    Rice v. Branch Furniture Inc

    E.D. Wisconsin, filed by Nye, Stirling, Hale, Miller & Sweet, LLP. Attributed to Wisconsin

    Court recordfor Rice v. Branch Furniture Inc (opens in a new tab)
  6. Accessibility

    Jackson v. The Spa and Sauna Co. LLC

    N.D. Illinois, filed by Nye, Stirling, Hale, Miller & Sweet, LLP. Attributed to Illinois

    Court recordfor Jackson v. The Spa and Sauna Co. LLC (opens in a new tab)
  7. Accessibility

    Rice v. Panasonic Corporation of North America

    E.D. Wisconsin, filed by Nye, Stirling, Hale, Miller & Sweet, LLP. Attributed to Wisconsin

    Court recordfor Rice v. Panasonic Corporation of North America (opens in a new tab)
  8. Accessibility

    Rice v. Trayvax Enterprises LLC

    E.D. Wisconsin, filed by Nye, Stirling, Hale, Miller & Sweet, LLP. Attributed to Wisconsin

    Court recordfor Rice v. Trayvax Enterprises LLC (opens in a new tab)
  9. Accessibility

    GRANT v. HAIRMAX INTERNATIONAL, LLC

    S.D. Indiana, filed by Nye, Stirling, Hale, Miller & Sweet, LLP. Attributed to Indiana

    Court recordfor GRANT v. HAIRMAX INTERNATIONAL, LLC (opens in a new tab)
  10. Accessibility

    Booker v. Budhagirl, LLC

    N.D. Illinois, filed by Nye, Stirling, Hale, Miller & Sweet, LLP. Attributed to Illinois

    Court recordfor Booker v. Budhagirl, LLC (opens in a new tab)
  11. Accessibility

    Rice v. Columbia Valley Family Farms Inc

    E.D. Wisconsin, filed by Nye, Stirling, Hale, Miller & Sweet, LLP. Attributed to Wisconsin

    Court recordfor Rice v. Columbia Valley Family Farms Inc (opens in a new tab)
  12. Accessibility

    Rice v. RP55 Inc

    E.D. Wisconsin, filed by Nye, Stirling, Hale & Miller, LLP. Attributed to Wisconsin

    Court recordfor Rice v. RP55 Inc (opens in a new tab)
  13. Accessibility

    Smith v. 13 Rattles, Inc.

    N.D. Illinois, filed by Nye, Stirling, Hale, Miller & Sweet, LLP. Attributed to Illinois

    Court recordfor Smith v. 13 Rattles, Inc. (opens in a new tab)
  14. Accessibility

    Smith v. Kids2, LLC

    N.D. Illinois, filed by Nye, Stirling, Hale, Miller & Sweet, LLP. Attributed to Illinois

    Court recordfor Smith v. Kids2, LLC (opens in a new tab)
  15. Accessibility

    Rice v. J Press Incorporated

    E.D. Wisconsin, filed by Nye, Stirling, Hale, Miller & Sweet, LLP. Attributed to Wisconsin

    Court recordfor Rice v. J Press Incorporated (opens in a new tab)
  16. Accessibility

    Jackson v. All American Clothing Brand LLC

    N.D. Illinois, filed by Nye, Stirling, Hale, Miller & Sweet, LLP. Attributed to Illinois

    Court recordfor Jackson v. All American Clothing Brand LLC (opens in a new tab)
  17. Accessibility

    Booker v. Azurous Inc.

    N.D. Illinois, filed by Dentons US LLP. Attributed to Illinois

    Court recordfor Booker v. Azurous Inc. (opens in a new tab)
  18. Accessibility

    RAINES v. PEANUT BUTTER & CO., INC.

    S.D. Indiana, filed by Dentons Bingham Greenebaum. Attributed to Indiana

    Court recordfor RAINES v. PEANUT BUTTER & CO., INC. (opens in a new tab)
  19. Accessibility

    Jackson v. Selle Royal USA Inc.

    N.D. Illinois, filed by Nye, Stirling, Hale, Miller & Sweet, LLP. Attributed to Illinois

    Court recordfor Jackson v. Selle Royal USA Inc. (opens in a new tab)
  20. Accessibility

    Smith v. Grand Brands, Inc.

    N.D. Illinois, filed by Alston & Bird LLP. Attributed to Illinois

    Court recordfor Smith v. Grand Brands, Inc. (opens in a new tab)
  21. Accessibility

    Rice v. Implus Footcare LLC

    E.D. Wisconsin, filed by Nye, Stirling, Hale, Miller & Sweet, LLP. Attributed to Wisconsin

    Court recordfor Rice v. Implus Footcare LLC (opens in a new tab)
  22. Accessibility

    Rice v. Human Power of N Company

    E.D. Wisconsin, filed by Nye, Stirling, Hale, Miller & Sweet, LLP. Attributed to Wisconsin

    Court recordfor Rice v. Human Power of N Company (opens in a new tab)
  23. Accessibility

    GRANT v. BRACKISH BOW TIES, LLC

    S.D. Indiana, filed by Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP. Attributed to Indiana

    Court recordfor GRANT v. BRACKISH BOW TIES, LLC (opens in a new tab)
  24. Accessibility

    Fiallo v. Modway Inc.

    N.D. Illinois, filed by Pittsburgh. Attributed to Illinois

    Court recordfor Fiallo v. Modway Inc. (opens in a new tab)
  25. Accessibility

    Jackson v. Performance Apparel LLC

    N.D. Illinois, filed by Nye, Stirling, Hale, Miller & Sweet, LLP. Attributed to Illinois

    Court recordfor Jackson v. Performance Apparel LLC (opens in a new tab)

Questions owners ask

What to do with a letter from this firm, and what these numbers include.
I received a letter from Nye, Stirling, Hale, Miller & Sweet, LLP. What should I do?
Do not ignore it and do not reply before talking to a lawyer. Preserve the site as it is by taking dated screenshots and a scan, then fix what the letter cites so the record shows the changes and when they happened. The guides on this site explain what these letters usually say and how owners typically respond in the first week.
Is this every case the firm has filed?
No. The counts are federal dockets that name the firm in CourtListener's records, and the list shows the ones Suitcast has verified as website cases. State-court cases without a public source are not counted, so these numbers are a floor.
Why does the firm appear on this site?
Court filings are public records and the firm's name appears on each docket. Suitcast publishes counts and links to those records so business owners can see who is active in their state. It does not comment on the firm and it does not contact the businesses named as defendants.

Keep going

Check your site for what this firm cites

The free scan loads five public pages and lists the trackers that fire before consent and the accessibility failures complaints cite, so the conversation with your lawyer starts with facts.

Free, about a minute, no signup for your score.

Suitcast identifies risk indicators. It is not legal advice and does not determine compliance.