Why are law firms sued over their websites?

Because they run the tools complaints name: booking or contact forms without labels, image-heavy pages without descriptions, and marketing pixels or chat widgets that load before a visitor consents. Plaintiff firms search for those patterns and file in batches, which is why the same industry shows up repeatedly in a month.

How is the industry determined?

From the defendant's name and, when the complaint is available, its description of the business, mapped to one of twenty industry groups. Cases whose industry cannot be determined are counted in state totals but not on industry pages.

Does this list include state-court cases?

Partly. Federal filings are complete for what CourtListener publishes; state filings are added weekly from public sources with a link on each row. Every count carries that note.

Website lawsuits by industry

Website lawsuits against law firms

Two kinds of website lawsuit are filed against businesses every week: over tracking scripts that run before a visitor agrees, and over accessibility failures. See who was sued, then check your own site.

Verified filings against law firms

Accessibility (ADA)

30 days: 0
90 days: 0
12 months: 0

Tracking (CIPA)

30 days: 0
90 days: 0
12 months: 2

Filings by month, last 12 months

Updated Sep 14, 2026How cases are verified

The short answer

Suitcast counts 0 website accessibility lawsuits in the last 12 months and 2 website tracking lawsuits in the last 12 months against law firms, verified from federal court records and sourced state filings. The most active plaintiff firm is Munger Tolles & Olson LLP. That is under the five filings needed for local statistics, so national figures appear alongside.

Industry is read from the defendant's name and the complaint text, so many filings are counted in state totals before their industry is known. Nationwide, 420 tracking filings and 834 accessibility filings are on record. See the national picture.

Trend

Filings against law firms, month by month

Accessibility and tracking filings stacked by the month they were filed.

Website accessibility (ADA) Website tracking (CIPA)

October 2025 to September 2026, current month to date

Who files

Who files against law firms

Plaintiff firms and repeat plaintiffs with verified filings against this industry in the last 12 months.

Most active plaintiff firms against law firms

Verified filings, last 12 months

1Munger Tolles & Olson LLP1 filing

Repeat plaintiffs against law firms

Three or more filings, 12 months

No repeat plaintiff here yet

Named plaintiffs appear once they have three or more verified filings against law firms in 12 months. Most website suits are filed by a small group of repeat plaintiffs.

Court records

Latest verified filings against law firms

Newest first. Every row links to the court record.

TrackingFiled Mar 27, 2026
Erdos-Major v. Accenture LLP, Neuraflash
S.D. California, filed by Munger Tolles & Olson LLP
Court recordfor Erdos-Major v. Accenture LLP, Neuraflash (opens in a new tab)
TrackingFiled Feb 27, 2026
C.A.L. v. CNY Fertility, PLLC
N.D. New York
Court recordfor C.A.L. v. CNY Fertility, PLLC (opens in a new tab)

Other industries

Website lawsuits in other industries

Each industry page counts its own filings, firms and repeat plaintiffs.

Questions owners ask

Why law firms are sued over their websites, and how these numbers are built.

Why are law firms sued over their websites?: Because they run the tools complaints name: booking or contact forms without labels, image-heavy pages without descriptions, and marketing pixels or chat widgets that load before a visitor consents. Plaintiff firms search for those patterns and file in batches, which is why the same industry shows up repeatedly in a month.
How is the industry determined?: From the defendant's name and, when the complaint is available, its description of the business, mapped to one of twenty industry groups. Cases whose industry cannot be determined are counted in state totals but not on industry pages.
Does this list include state-court cases?: Partly. Federal filings are complete for what CourtListener publishes; state filings are added weekly from public sources with a link on each row. Every count carries that note.

Keep going

Check your website before a firm does

The free scan loads five public pages, lists the trackers that fire before consent and the accessibility failures complaints cite, and matches them to filings against law firms.

Suitcast identifies risk indicators. It is not legal advice and does not determine compliance.