Skip to content

Website lawsuits by industry

Website lawsuits against auto dealers and repair

Two kinds of website lawsuit are filed against businesses every week: over tracking scripts that run before a visitor agrees, and over accessibility failures. See who was sued, then check your own site.

Free, about a minute, no signup for your score.

Verified filings against auto dealers and repair

Accessibility (ADA)

30 days
0
90 days
0
12 months
0

Tracking (CIPA)

30 days
0
90 days
0
12 months
3

Filings by month, last 12 months

Updated Sep 14, 2026How cases are verified

The short answer

Suitcast counts 0 website accessibility lawsuits in the last 12 months and 3 website tracking lawsuits in the last 12 months against auto dealers and repair, verified from federal court records and sourced state filings. The most active plaintiff firm is Potter Handy, LLP. That is under the five filings needed for local statistics, so national figures appear alongside.

Industry is read from the defendant's name and the complaint text, so many filings are counted in state totals before their industry is known. Nationwide, 420 tracking filings and 834 accessibility filings are on record. See the national picture.

Trend

Filings against auto dealers and repair, month by month

Accessibility and tracking filings stacked by the month they were filed.

Website accessibility (ADA) Website tracking (CIPA)

October 2025 to September 2026, current month to date

Who files

Who files against auto dealers and repair

Plaintiff firms and repeat plaintiffs with verified filings against this industry in the last 12 months.

Most active plaintiff firms against auto dealers and repair

Verified filings, last 12 months
  1. 1Potter Handy, LLP2
  2. 2Swigart Law Group APC1

Repeat plaintiffs against auto dealers and repair

Three or more filings, 12 months

No repeat plaintiff here yet

Named plaintiffs appear once they have three or more verified filings against auto dealers and repair in 12 months. Most website suits are filed by a small group of repeat plaintiffs.

Court records

Latest verified filings against auto dealers and repair

Newest first. Every row links to the court record.
  1. Tracking

    McPhee v. Big O Tires, LLC

    N.D. California, filed by Isabel Rose Masanque

    Court recordfor McPhee v. Big O Tires, LLC (opens in a new tab)
  2. Tracking

    McPhee v. Big Brand Tire & Service

    N.D. California, filed by Potter Handy, LLP

    Court recordfor McPhee v. Big Brand Tire & Service (opens in a new tab)
  3. Tracking

    McBride v. General Motors LLC

    S.D. California, filed by Swigart Law Group

    Court recordfor McBride v. General Motors LLC (opens in a new tab)

Questions owners ask

Why auto dealers and repair are sued over their websites, and how these numbers are built.
Why are auto dealers and repair sued over their websites?
Because they run the tools complaints name: booking or contact forms without labels, image-heavy pages without descriptions, and marketing pixels or chat widgets that load before a visitor consents. Plaintiff firms search for those patterns and file in batches, which is why the same industry shows up repeatedly in a month.
How is the industry determined?
From the defendant's name and, when the complaint is available, its description of the business, mapped to one of twenty industry groups. Cases whose industry cannot be determined are counted in state totals but not on industry pages.
Does this list include state-court cases?
Partly. Federal filings are complete for what CourtListener publishes; state filings are added weekly from public sources with a link on each row. Every count carries that note.

Check your website before a firm does

The free scan loads five public pages, lists the trackers that fire before consent and the accessibility failures complaints cite, and matches them to filings against auto dealers and repair.

Free, about a minute, no signup for your score.

Suitcast identifies risk indicators. It is not legal advice and does not determine compliance.