Session replay from Contentsquare
Contentsquare and website tracking lawsuits
What Suitcast knows about Contentsquare
Critical risk
- Type
- Session replay
- Complaints naming it, 12 months
- 2
Requests the scanner matches to it
- t.contentsquare.net
- c.contentsquare.net
- .contentsquare.net
- .contentsquare.com
The short answer
Contentsquare is a session replay tool from Contentsquare. Suitcast rates its risk under the California Invasion of Privacy Act, CIPA, as critical, because complaints describe scripts like it recording visitors before they consent. It is named in 2 verified complaints in the last 12 months. The fix is to load it only after a visitor accepts, or to remove it when it is not used.
Why complaints name it
Recording tools like this are the central example in California privacy complaints, which describe them as capturing a visitor's interaction with the page without consent.
The act allows $5,000 per violation, which is why firms look for scripts that run the moment a page opens.
The fix
How to stop Contentsquare firing before consent
Ask your developer to load Contentsquare only after your banner records an accept and to use its consent setting.
Remove it if your team is not using the reports.
How the scan checks this
- Loads your pages like a first visit. A real browser, nothing clicked, nothing accepted.
- Checks every request before the banner is answered. A request to t.contentsquare.net is matched to Contentsquare and recorded with the millisecond it fired.
- Clicks reject and watches again. When the banner has a reject button, the scan presses it; if Contentsquare keeps firing, the report says so.
Scanner rules and limits are on the methodology page.
Trend
Complaints naming Contentsquare, month by month
Website accessibility (ADA) Website tracking (CIPA)
October 2025 to September 2026, current month to dateCourt records
Latest verified complaints naming Contentsquare
- TrackingCourt recordfor Maurer v. Edward D. Jones & Co., L.P. (opens in a new tab)
Maurer v. Edward D. Jones & Co., L.P.
E.D. Missouri, filed by Schubert and Jonckheer LLP. Attributed to Missouri
- TrackingCourt recordfor Del Salto v. Rolex Watch U.S.A., Inc. (opens in a new tab)
Del Salto v. Rolex Watch U.S.A., Inc.
N.D. California, filed by Potter Handy, LLP. Attributed to New York
Same type
Other session replay tools the scanner checks
Questions owners ask
- Is having Contentsquare on my site illegal?
- No. The complaints do not claim the script is illegal; they claim it recorded a visitor before the visitor consented, or kept recording after the visitor declined. Loading Contentsquare only after consent, or removing it when it is not used, is what removes the pattern the complaints describe.
- How do I know if Contentsquare fires before consent on my site?
- Run the free scan. It loads your pages without clicking anything and checks every request that leaves the browser against its tracker catalog, recording the millisecond each match fired. If Contentsquare appears, it fired before consent. When your banner has a reject button, the scan clicks it and reports whether the script kept firing.
- Where do the case counts on this page come from?
- From the complaint text of verified California Invasion of Privacy Act filings. When a complaint names this script, the case is linked to it. Complaints that are not yet available in the public record are not counted, so the number is a floor.
Keep going
- Every tracking script the scanner recognizesGrouped by type, with the risk and fix for each.
- Which scripts appear most in privacy lawsuitsWhat each records and how to gate it.
- I got a CIPA demand letter. What now?What the letter means and the first week.
- Website lawsuits in CaliforniaWhere most tracking suits are filed.
Does Contentsquare fire before consent on your site?
Suitcast identifies risk indicators. It is not legal advice and does not determine compliance.