Session replay from Hotjar (Contentsquare)
Hotjar and website tracking lawsuits
What Suitcast knows about Hotjar
Critical risk
- Type
- Session replay
- Complaints naming it, 12 months
- 2
Requests the scanner matches to it
- static.hotjar.com
- script.hotjar.com
- .hotjar.com
- .hotjar.io
The short answer
Hotjar is a session replay tool from Hotjar (Contentsquare). Suitcast rates its risk under the California Invasion of Privacy Act, CIPA, as critical, because complaints describe scripts like it recording visitors before they consent. It is named in 2 verified complaints in the last 12 months. The fix is to load it only after a visitor accepts, or to remove it when it is not used.
Why complaints name it
Session recording tools like this are the central example in California privacy complaints, which describe them as wiretapping a visitor's interaction with the page.
The act allows $5,000 per violation, which is why firms look for scripts that run the moment a page opens.
The fix
How to stop Hotjar firing before consent
In Hotjar, turn on the setting that waits for consent, and fire the script only after accept through your consent plugin or Google Tag Manager consent mode.
If no one on your team reviews the recordings, remove Hotjar.
How the scan checks this
- Loads your pages like a first visit. A real browser, nothing clicked, nothing accepted.
- Checks every request before the banner is answered. A request to static.hotjar.com is matched to Hotjar and recorded with the millisecond it fired.
- Clicks reject and watches again. When the banner has a reject button, the scan presses it; if Hotjar keeps firing, the report says so.
Scanner rules and limits are on the methodology page.
Trend
Complaints naming Hotjar, month by month
Website accessibility (ADA) Website tracking (CIPA)
October 2025 to September 2026, current month to dateCourt records
Latest verified complaints naming Hotjar
- TrackingCourt recordfor Sanchez v. QuinStreet, Inc. (opens in a new tab)
Sanchez v. QuinStreet, Inc.
S.D. California. Attributed to California
- TrackingCourt recordfor Del Salto v. Rolex Watch U.S.A., Inc. (opens in a new tab)
Del Salto v. Rolex Watch U.S.A., Inc.
N.D. California, filed by Potter Handy, LLP. Attributed to New York
Same type
Other session replay tools the scanner checks
Questions owners ask
- Is having Hotjar on my site illegal?
- No. The complaints do not claim the script is illegal; they claim it recorded a visitor before the visitor consented, or kept recording after the visitor declined. Loading Hotjar only after consent, or removing it when it is not used, is what removes the pattern the complaints describe.
- How do I know if Hotjar fires before consent on my site?
- Run the free scan. It loads your pages without clicking anything and checks every request that leaves the browser against its tracker catalog, recording the millisecond each match fired. If Hotjar appears, it fired before consent. When your banner has a reject button, the scan clicks it and reports whether the script kept firing.
- Where do the case counts on this page come from?
- From the complaint text of verified California Invasion of Privacy Act filings. When a complaint names this script, the case is linked to it. Complaints that are not yet available in the public record are not counted, so the number is a floor.
Keep going
- Every tracking script the scanner recognizesGrouped by type, with the risk and fix for each.
- Which scripts appear most in privacy lawsuitsWhat each records and how to gate it.
- I got a CIPA demand letter. What now?What the letter means and the first week.
- Website lawsuits in CaliforniaWhere most tracking suits are filed.
Does Hotjar fire before consent on your site?
Suitcast identifies risk indicators. It is not legal advice and does not determine compliance.