Skip to content

Advertising pixel from Snap Inc.

Snap Pixel and website tracking lawsuits

The Snap Pixel measures Snapchat ads by reporting page views and purchases back to Snap.

Free, about a minute, no signup for your score.

What Suitcast knows about Snap Pixel

High risk

Type
Advertising pixel
Complaints naming it, 12 months
40

Requests the scanner matches to it

  • sc-static.net
  • tr.snapchat.com
  • .sc-static.net
  • .snapchat.com

The short answer

Snap Pixel is an advertising pixel from Snap Inc.. Suitcast rates its risk under the California Invasion of Privacy Act, CIPA, as high, because complaints describe scripts like it recording visitors before they consent. It is named in 40 verified complaints in the last 12 months. The fix is to load it only after a visitor accepts, or to remove it when it is not used.

Why complaints name it

Complaints group it with other ad pixels that send visitor activity to a social network before consent.

The act allows $5,000 per violation, which is why firms look for scripts that run the moment a page opens.

The fix

How to stop Snap Pixel firing before consent

Written for the person who runs the site, with the setting to change.

  1. Load it only after accept through Shopify's Snapchat app, your WordPress consent plugin, or an ad_storage consent requirement in Google Tag Manager.

  2. Remove it if you are not running Snapchat ads.

How the scan checks this

  1. Loads your pages like a first visit. A real browser, nothing clicked, nothing accepted.
  2. Checks every request before the banner is answered. A request to sc-static.net is matched to Snap Pixel and recorded with the millisecond it fired.
  3. Clicks reject and watches again. When the banner has a reject button, the scan presses it; if Snap Pixel keeps firing, the report says so.

Scanner rules and limits are on the methodology page.

Trend

Complaints naming Snap Pixel, month by month

Verified tracking complaints whose text names this script, by the month they were filed.

Website accessibility (ADA) Website tracking (CIPA)

November 2025 to October 2026, current month to date

Industries

Industries sued over Snap Pixel

Verified complaints naming this script, by the defendant's industry.

By the defendant's industry

Verified filings, 12 months
  1. 1Medical and health providers4
  2. 2Banks, lenders and insurance3
  3. 3Schools and education1
  4. 4Retail and online stores1

Court records

Latest verified complaints naming Snap Pixel

Newest first. Every row links to the court record.
  1. Tracking

    Pearson v. Hims & Hers Health, Inc.

    N.D. California, filed by Schubert Jonckheer & Kolbe. Attributed to California

    Court recordfor Pearson v. Hims & Hers Health, Inc. (opens in a new tab)
  2. Tracking

    Wilce v. Willow Health Services, Inc.

    E.D. California, filed by Almeida Law Group LLC. Attributed to Texas

    Court recordfor Wilce v. Willow Health Services, Inc. (opens in a new tab)
  3. Tracking

    Gilbert v. Brooklinen, Inc.

    E.D. New York. Attributed to New York

    Court recordfor Gilbert v. Brooklinen, Inc. (opens in a new tab)
  4. Tracking

    Fedoroff v. Rocket Mortgage, LLC

    E.D. Michigan, filed by Goodwin Procter LLP. Attributed to Michigan

    Court recordfor Fedoroff v. Rocket Mortgage, LLC (opens in a new tab)
  5. Tracking

    Ewart v. Fender Musical Instruments Corp.

    N.D. California, filed by Gutride Safier LLP. Attributed to California

    Court recordfor Ewart v. Fender Musical Instruments Corp. (opens in a new tab)
  6. Tracking

    Avots-Smith v. North Beam, Inc.

    N.D. California. Attributed to California

    Court recordfor Avots-Smith v. North Beam, Inc. (opens in a new tab)
  7. Tracking

    Hartigan v. Macys.com, LLC

    S.D. California. Attributed to New York

    Court recordfor Hartigan v. Macys.com, LLC (opens in a new tab)
  8. Tracking

    Eugenio v. Premium Brands Opco LLC

    N.D. California, filed by Gutride Safier LLP. Attributed to New York

    Court recordfor Eugenio v. Premium Brands Opco LLC (opens in a new tab)
  9. Tracking

    Carol Jackson v. Diff, LLC

    C.D. California. Attributed to California

    Court recordfor Carol Jackson v. Diff, LLC (opens in a new tab)
  10. Tracking

    Coleman v. CKE Restaurants Inc.

    N.D. California, filed by Gutride Safier LLP. Attributed to Tennessee

    Court recordfor Coleman v. CKE Restaurants Inc. (opens in a new tab)
  11. Tracking

    Nacarino v. Wynn Resorts Holdings, LLC

    N.D. California. Attributed to Nevada

    Court recordfor Nacarino v. Wynn Resorts Holdings, LLC (opens in a new tab)
  12. Tracking

    Tucker v. Ashley Global Retail, LLC

    N.D. California. Attributed to Wisconsin

    Court recordfor Tucker v. Ashley Global Retail, LLC (opens in a new tab)
  13. Tracking

    Wheeler v. Wyze Labs Inc

    W.D. Washington, filed by Levi & Korsinsky LLP (Ny). Attributed to Washington

    Court recordfor Wheeler v. Wyze Labs Inc (opens in a new tab)
  14. Tracking

    Rouby v. J.G. Wentworth Company

    N.D. California. Attributed to Pennsylvania

    Court recordfor Rouby v. J.G. Wentworth Company (opens in a new tab)
  15. Tracking

    Greer v. Starship, LLC

    N.D. California. Attributed to California

    Court recordfor Greer v. Starship, LLC (opens in a new tab)

Same type

Other advertising pixels the scanner checks

Scripts of the same kind carry the same pattern in complaints, and the same fix.

Questions owners ask

Whether Snap Pixel is a problem, how to check your site, and where the counts come from.
Is having Snap Pixel on my site illegal?
No. The complaints do not claim the script is illegal; they claim it recorded a visitor before the visitor consented, or kept recording after the visitor declined. Loading Snap Pixel only after consent, or removing it when it is not used, is what removes the pattern the complaints describe.
How do I know if Snap Pixel fires before consent on my site?
Run the free scan. It loads your pages without clicking anything and checks every request that leaves the browser against its tracker catalog, recording the millisecond each match fired. If Snap Pixel appears, it fired before consent. When your banner has a reject button, the scan clicks it and reports whether the script kept firing.
Where do the case counts on this page come from?
From the complaint text of verified California Invasion of Privacy Act filings. When a complaint names this script, the case is linked to it. Complaints that are not yet available in the public record are not counted, so the number is a floor.

Keep going

Does Snap Pixel fire before consent on your site?

The free scan checks every request your pages make before the banner is answered, shows the millisecond Snap Pixel fired, and whether it kept firing after reject.

Free, about a minute, no signup for your score.

Suitcast identifies risk indicators. It is not legal advice and does not determine compliance.