Skip to content

Plaintiff law firm

Levi & Korsinsky LLP

Levi & Korsinsky LLP files website tracking lawsuits against businesses. See where it files and what its complaints cite, then check whether your site has the same issues.

Free, about a minute, no signup for your score.

Federal dockets naming the firm

Last 90 days
0
Last 12 months
5
Most recent filing
May 14, 2026
Based in
California
Files over
Website tracking
Counts include federal filings from CourtListener and curated state filings with sources. State-court coverage is partial.

The short answer

Levi & Korsinsky LLP, based in California, is a plaintiff-side law firm named on 5 federal website tracking lawsuit dockets in the last 12 months, 0 of them in the last 90 days, most recently on May 14, 2026. Most of its verified filings are against businesses in California. Counts come from CourtListener docket records and refresh daily.

Where it files

The states and courts in its verified filings

Verified filings in the last 12 months, by the defendant's state and by the federal court the case was filed in.

Defendants by state

Verified filings, 12 months
  1. 1California3
  2. 2New York2
  3. 3Georgia1
  4. 4Iowa1
  5. 5Texas1

Federal courts

Verified filings, 12 months
  1. 1District Court, N.D. California2
  2. 2District Court, S.D. New York2
  3. 3District Court, C.D. California1
  4. 4District Court, N.D. Georgia1
  5. 5District Court, S.D. Iowa1
  6. 6District Court, E.D. Texas1

Trend

Levi & Korsinsky LLP filings, month by month

Verified filings linked to the firm, by the month they were filed. Firms file in batches, which is why months jump.

Website accessibility (ADA) Website tracking (CIPA)

October 2025 to September 2026, current month to date

Industries

Industries it sues

Verified filings in the last 12 months by the defendant's industry.

By the defendant's industry

Verified filings, 12 months
  1. 1Schools and education1
  2. 2Entertainment and media1
  3. 3Medical and health providers1

Court records

Latest verified filings by Levi & Korsinsky LLP

Newest first. Every row links to the court record.
  1. Tracking

    Hanfling v. Grinnell College

    S.D. Iowa, filed by Shindler, Anderson, Goplerud & Weese, P.C.

    Court recordfor Hanfling v. Grinnell College (opens in a new tab)
  2. Tracking

    Nakamura v. Pfizer Inc.

    S.D. New York, filed by Levi & Korsinsky LLP

    Court recordfor Nakamura v. Pfizer Inc. (opens in a new tab)
  3. Tracking

    Colley v. Honey Baked Ham Company, LLC

    N.D. Georgia, filed by Herman Jones LLP

    Court recordfor Colley v. Honey Baked Ham Company, LLC (opens in a new tab)
  4. Tracking

    Steve Shannon v. Health Net LLC

    C.D. California, filed by Ahdoot & Wolfson, PC

    Court recordfor Steve Shannon v. Health Net LLC (opens in a new tab)
  5. Tracking

    Pflaumer v. ACE Hardware Corporation

    N.D. California, filed by Levi & Korsinsky LLP

    Court recordfor Pflaumer v. ACE Hardware Corporation (opens in a new tab)
  6. Tracking

    Ianozi v. HP Inc.

    N.D. California, filed by Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy LLP

    Court recordfor Ianozi v. HP Inc. (opens in a new tab)
  7. Tracking

    Smith v. European Wax Center, Inc.

    E.D. Texas, filed by Foster Yarborough Killingsworth PLLC, Foster Yarborough Killingsworth PLLC

    Court recordfor Smith v. European Wax Center, Inc. (opens in a new tab)
  8. Tracking

    Rada v. Versant Media, LLC

    S.D. New York, filed by Levi & Korsinsky LLP

    Court recordfor Rada v. Versant Media, LLC (opens in a new tab)

Questions owners ask

What to do with a letter from this firm, and what these numbers include.
I received a letter from Levi & Korsinsky LLP. What should I do?
Do not ignore it and do not reply before talking to a lawyer. Preserve the site as it is by taking dated screenshots and a scan, then fix what the letter cites so the record shows the changes and when they happened. The guides on this site explain what these letters usually say and how owners typically respond in the first week.
Is this every case the firm has filed?
No. The counts are federal dockets that name the firm in CourtListener's records, and the list shows the ones Suitcast has verified as website cases. State-court cases without a public source are not counted, so these numbers are a floor.
Why does the firm appear on this site?
Court filings are public records and the firm's name appears on each docket. Suitcast publishes counts and links to those records so business owners can see who is active in their state. It does not comment on the firm and it does not contact the businesses named as defendants.

Keep going

Check your site for what this firm cites

The free scan loads five public pages and lists the trackers that fire before consent and the accessibility failures complaints cite, so the conversation with your lawyer starts with facts.

Free, about a minute, no signup for your score.

Suitcast identifies risk indicators. It is not legal advice and does not determine compliance.