Skip to content

Plaintiff law firm

Nathan & Associates, APC

Nathan & Associates, APC files website tracking lawsuits against businesses. See where it files and what its complaints cite, then check whether your site has the same issues.

Free, about a minute, no signup for your score.

Federal dockets naming the firm

Last 90 days
1
Last 12 months
17
Most recent filing
Jul 17, 2026
Based in
California
Files over
Website tracking
Counts include federal filings from CourtListener and curated state filings with sources. State-court coverage is partial.

The short answer

Nathan & Associates, APC, based in California, is a plaintiff-side law firm named on 17 federal website tracking lawsuit dockets in the last 12 months, 1 of them in the last 90 days, most recently on Jul 17, 2026. Most of its verified filings are against businesses in California. Its complaints most often cite Google Analytics 4. Counts come from CourtListener docket records and refresh daily.

Where it files

The states and courts in its verified filings

Verified filings in the last 12 months, by the defendant's state and by the federal court the case was filed in.

Defendants by state

Verified filings, 12 months
  1. 1California22
  2. 2New York1

Federal courts

Verified filings, 12 months
  1. 1District Court, E.D. California12
  2. 2District Court, N.D. California11

Trend

Nathan & Associates, APC filings, month by month

Verified filings linked to the firm, by the month they were filed. Firms file in batches, which is why months jump.

Website accessibility (ADA) Website tracking (CIPA)

October 2025 to September 2026, current month to date

What its complaints cite

The issues named in its complaints

Issues found in the complaint text of its verified filings. If your site has these, a letter from this firm would likely list them.

Issues cited

Complaints, 12 months
  1. 1Google Analytics 41

Industries

Industries it sues

Verified filings in the last 12 months by the defendant's industry.

By the defendant's industry

Verified filings, 12 months
  1. 1Entertainment and media3
  2. 2Retail and online stores1

Court records

Latest verified filings by Nathan & Associates, APC

Newest first. Every row links to the court record.
  1. Tracking

    Erakat v. The Intercept Media, Inc.

    E.D. California, filed by Law Offices of Ross Cornell APC. Attributed to New York

    Court recordfor Erakat v. The Intercept Media, Inc. (opens in a new tab)
  2. Tracking

    Erakat v. GoodRx, Inc.

    E.D. California, filed by Nathan & Associates, APC

    Court recordfor Erakat v. GoodRx, Inc. (opens in a new tab)
  3. Tracking

    Scruggs v. Vivid Seats LLC

    E.D. California, filed by Nathan & Associates, APC

    Court recordfor Scruggs v. Vivid Seats LLC (opens in a new tab)
  4. Tracking

    Scruggs v. SeatGeek, Inc.

    E.D. California, filed by Nathan & Associates, APC

    Court recordfor Scruggs v. SeatGeek, Inc. (opens in a new tab)
  5. Tracking

    Erakat v. Axios Media Inc.

    N.D. California, filed by Law Offices of Ross Cornell APC

    Court recordfor Erakat v. Axios Media Inc. (opens in a new tab)
  6. Tracking

    Elmarouk v. Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC

    N.D. California, filed by Nathan & Associates, APC

    Court recordfor Elmarouk v. Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC (opens in a new tab)
  7. Tracking

    White v. NBCUniversal Media, LLC

    N.D. California, filed by Nathan & Associates, APC

    Court recordfor White v. NBCUniversal Media, LLC (opens in a new tab)
  8. Tracking

    White v. CBS Interactive Inc.

    N.D. California, filed by Nathan & Associates, APC

    Court recordfor White v. CBS Interactive Inc. (opens in a new tab)
  9. Tracking

    Ridzuan v. The Container Store, Inc.

    N.D. California, filed by Nathan & Associates, APC

    Court recordfor Ridzuan v. The Container Store, Inc. (opens in a new tab)
  10. Tracking

    Erakat v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc.

    N.D. California, filed by Law Offices of Ross Cornell APC

    Court recordfor Erakat v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. (opens in a new tab)
  11. Tracking

    Erakat v. Carvana Operations HC LLC

    N.D. California, filed by Nathan & Associates, APC

    Court recordfor Erakat v. Carvana Operations HC LLC (opens in a new tab)
  12. Tracking

    Abdullah v. Stitch Fix, Inc.

    N.D. California, filed by Law Offices of Ross Cornell APC

    Court recordfor Abdullah v. Stitch Fix, Inc. (opens in a new tab)
  13. Tracking

    Abdullah v. Disney DTC LLC

    N.D. California, filed by Nathan & Associates, APC

    Court recordfor Abdullah v. Disney DTC LLC (opens in a new tab)
  14. Tracking

    Abdullah v. Nike, Inc.

    N.D. California, filed by Nathan & Associates, APC

    Court recordfor Abdullah v. Nike, Inc. (opens in a new tab)
  15. Tracking

    Kroskey v. LifeMD, Inc.

    N.D. California, filed by Nathan & Associates, APC

    Court recordfor Kroskey v. LifeMD, Inc. (opens in a new tab)
  16. Tracking

    Erakat v. Skechers U.S.A., Inc.

    E.D. California, filed by Nathan & Associates, APC

    Court recordfor Erakat v. Skechers U.S.A., Inc. (opens in a new tab)
  17. Tracking

    Erakat v. Skechers U.S.A., Inc.

    E.D. California, filed by Nathan & Associates, APC

    Court recordfor Erakat v. Skechers U.S.A., Inc. (opens in a new tab)
  18. Tracking

    Rios v. The Estee Lauder Companies Inc.

    E.D. California, filed by Nathan & Associates, APC

    Court recordfor Rios v. The Estee Lauder Companies Inc. (opens in a new tab)
  19. Tracking

    Dawkins v. Dow Jones & Company, Inc.

    E.D. California, filed by Law Offices of Ross Cornell APC

    Court recordfor Dawkins v. Dow Jones & Company, Inc. (opens in a new tab)
  20. Tracking

    Dawkins v. The Estee Lauder Companies Inc.

    E.D. California, filed by Nathan & Associates, APC

    Court recordfor Dawkins v. The Estee Lauder Companies Inc. (opens in a new tab)
  21. Tracking

    Dawkins v. The Procter & Gamble Company

    E.D. California, filed by Kristin L. Bryan , PHV

    Court recordfor Dawkins v. The Procter & Gamble Company (opens in a new tab)
  22. Tracking

    Dawkins v. Tiffany and Company

    E.D. California, filed by Nathan & Associates, APC

    Court recordfor Dawkins v. Tiffany and Company (opens in a new tab)
  23. Tracking

    Dawkins v. Tiffany and Co.

    E.D. California, filed by Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP

    Court recordfor Dawkins v. Tiffany and Co. (opens in a new tab)

Questions owners ask

What to do with a letter from this firm, and what these numbers include.
I received a letter from Nathan & Associates, APC. What should I do?
Do not ignore it and do not reply before talking to a lawyer. Preserve the site as it is by taking dated screenshots and a scan, then fix what the letter cites so the record shows the changes and when they happened. The guides on this site explain what these letters usually say and how owners typically respond in the first week.
Is this every case the firm has filed?
No. The counts are federal dockets that name the firm in CourtListener's records, and the list shows the ones Suitcast has verified as website cases. State-court cases without a public source are not counted, so these numbers are a floor.
Why does the firm appear on this site?
Court filings are public records and the firm's name appears on each docket. Suitcast publishes counts and links to those records so business owners can see who is active in their state. It does not comment on the firm and it does not contact the businesses named as defendants.

Keep going

Check your site for what this firm cites

The free scan loads five public pages and lists the trackers that fire before consent and the accessibility failures complaints cite, so the conversation with your lawyer starts with facts.

Free, about a minute, no signup for your score.

Suitcast identifies risk indicators. It is not legal advice and does not determine compliance.