Plaintiff law firm
Peiffer Wolf Carr Kane Conway & Wise LLP
Federal dockets naming the firm
- Last 90 days
- 0
- Last 12 months
- 3
- Most recent filing
- May 12, 2026
- Based in
- California
- Files over
- Website tracking
The short answer
Peiffer Wolf Carr Kane Conway & Wise LLP, based in California, is a plaintiff-side law firm named on 3 federal website tracking lawsuit dockets in the last 12 months, 0 of them in the last 90 days, most recently on May 12, 2026. Most of its verified filings are against businesses in California. Its complaints most often cite Google Ads conversion and remarketing tag, Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager. Counts come from CourtListener docket records and refresh daily.
Where it files
The states and courts in its verified filings
Defendants by state
Verified filings, 12 monthsFederal courts
Verified filings, 12 months- 1District Court, N.D. California2 filings
- 2District Court, D. Massachusetts2 filings
- 3District Court, S.D. California1 filing
Trend
Peiffer Wolf Carr Kane Conway & Wise LLP filings, month by month
Website accessibility (ADA) Website tracking (CIPA)
December 2025 to November 2026, current month to dateWhat its complaints cite
The issues named in its complaints
Industries
Industries it sues
By the defendant's industry
Verified filings, 12 monthsCourt records
Latest verified filings by Peiffer Wolf Carr Kane Conway & Wise LLP
- TrackingCourt recordfor Severino v. Hisense USA Corporation (opens in a new tab)
Severino v. Hisense USA Corporation
N.D. California, filed by Peiffer Wolf Carr Kane Conway and Wise LLP. Attributed to Georgia
- TrackingCourt recordfor Semonious v. Sony Electronics, Inc. (opens in a new tab)
Semonious v. Sony Electronics, Inc.
S.D. California, filed by Peiffer Wolf Carr Kane Conway and Wise LLP. Attributed to California
- TrackingCourt recordfor Ward v. Mochi Health Corp. (opens in a new tab)
Ward v. Mochi Health Corp.
N.D. California, filed by Peiffer Wolf Carr Kane Conway & Wise LLP. Attributed to California
- TrackingCourt recordfor M.C. 1 v. Curriculum Associates, LLC (opens in a new tab)
M.C. 1 v. Curriculum Associates, LLC
D. Massachusetts, filed by DOJ-Civ, Civil Division
- TrackingCourt recordfor M.C. 1 v. Curriculum Associates, LLC (opens in a new tab)
M.C. 1 v. Curriculum Associates, LLC
D. Massachusetts, filed by Hecht Partners LLP
Questions owners ask
- I received a letter from Peiffer Wolf Carr Kane Conway & Wise LLP. What should I do?
- Do not ignore it and do not reply before talking to a lawyer. Preserve the site as it is by taking dated screenshots and a scan, then fix what the letter cites so the record shows the changes and when they happened. The guides on this site explain what these letters usually say and how owners typically respond in the first week.
- Is this every case the firm has filed?
- No. The counts are federal dockets that name the firm in CourtListener's records, and the list shows the ones Suitcast has verified as website cases. State-court cases without a public source are not counted, so these numbers are a floor.
- Why does the firm appear on this site?
- Court filings are public records and the firm's name appears on each docket. Suitcast publishes counts and links to those records so business owners can see who is active in their state. It does not comment on the firm and it does not contact the businesses named as defendants.
Keep going
Check your site for what this firm cites
Suitcast identifies risk indicators. It is not legal advice and does not determine compliance.