I received a letter from Potter Handy, LLP. What should I do?

Do not ignore it and do not reply before talking to a lawyer. Preserve the site as it is by taking dated screenshots and a scan, then fix what the letter cites so the record shows the changes and when they happened. The guides on this site explain what these letters usually say and how owners typically respond in the first week.

Is this every case the firm has filed?

No. The counts are federal dockets that name the firm in CourtListener's records, and the list shows the ones Suitcast has verified as website cases. State-court cases without a public source are not counted, so these numbers are a floor.

Why does the firm appear on this site?

Court filings are public records and the firm's name appears on each docket. Suitcast publishes counts and links to those records so business owners can see who is active in their state. It does not comment on the firm and it does not contact the businesses named as defendants.

Plaintiff law firm

Potter Handy, LLP

Potter Handy, LLP files website tracking lawsuits against businesses. See where it files and what its complaints cite, then check whether your site has the same issues.

Federal dockets naming the firm

Last 90 days: 2
Last 12 months: 8
Most recent filing: Aug 3, 2026
Based in: California
Files over: Website tracking

Counts include federal filings from CourtListener and curated state filings with sources. State-court coverage is partial.

The short answer

Potter Handy, LLP, based in California, is a plaintiff-side law firm named on 8 federal website tracking lawsuit dockets in the last 12 months, 2 of them in the last 90 days, most recently on Aug 3, 2026. Most of its verified filings are against businesses in California. Its complaints most often cite Contentsquare, Google Ads conversion and remarketing tag, Hotjar. Counts come from CourtListener docket records and refresh daily.

Where it files

The states and courts in its verified filings

Verified filings in the last 12 months, by the defendant's state and by the federal court the case was filed in.

Defendants by state

Verified filings, 12 months

Federal courts

Verified filings, 12 months

1District Court, N.D. California8 filings

Trend

Potter Handy, LLP filings, month by month

Verified filings linked to the firm, by the month they were filed. Firms file in batches, which is why months jump.

Website accessibility (ADA) Website tracking (CIPA)

October 2025 to September 2026, current month to date

What its complaints cite

The issues named in its complaints

Issues found in the complaint text of its verified filings. If your site has these, a letter from this firm would likely list them.

Issues cited

Complaints, 12 months

Industries

Industries it sues

Verified filings in the last 12 months by the defendant's industry.

By the defendant's industry

Verified filings, 12 months

Court records

Latest verified filings by Potter Handy, LLP

Newest first. Every row links to the court record.

TrackingFiled Aug 3, 2026
Del Salto v. Rolex Watch U.S.A., Inc.
N.D. California, filed by Potter Handy, LLP. Attributed to New York
Court recordfor Del Salto v. Rolex Watch U.S.A., Inc. (opens in a new tab)
TrackingFiled Jun 16, 2026
Brownlee v. Apex Advising LLC
N.D. California, filed by Farnese P.C.
Court recordfor Brownlee v. Apex Advising LLC (opens in a new tab)
TrackingFiled Apr 8, 2026
McPhee v. Big O Tires, LLC
N.D. California, filed by Isabel Rose Masanque
Court recordfor McPhee v. Big O Tires, LLC (opens in a new tab)
TrackingFiled Apr 7, 2026
Washington v. Sutter Health
N.D. California, filed by Potter Handy, LLP
Court recordfor Washington v. Sutter Health (opens in a new tab)
TrackingFiled Mar 18, 2026
Davis v. NerdWallet, Inc.
N.D. California, filed by Goodwin Proctor
Court recordfor Davis v. NerdWallet, Inc. (opens in a new tab)
TrackingFiled Mar 16, 2026
Beltran v. VF Outdoor, LLC
N.D. California, filed by Perkins Coie LLP
Court recordfor Beltran v. VF Outdoor, LLC (opens in a new tab)
TrackingFiled Mar 13, 2026
McPhee v. Big Brand Tire & Service
N.D. California, filed by Potter Handy, LLP
Court recordfor McPhee v. Big Brand Tire & Service (opens in a new tab)
TrackingFiled Feb 20, 2026
Sherif v. Beenverified, LLC., a Delaware Limited Liability Company
N.D. California, filed by Potter Handy, LLP
Court recordfor Sherif v. Beenverified, LLC., a Delaware Limited Liability Company (opens in a new tab)

Questions owners ask

What to do with a letter from this firm, and what these numbers include.

I received a letter from Potter Handy, LLP. What should I do?: Do not ignore it and do not reply before talking to a lawyer. Preserve the site as it is by taking dated screenshots and a scan, then fix what the letter cites so the record shows the changes and when they happened. The guides on this site explain what these letters usually say and how owners typically respond in the first week.
Is this every case the firm has filed?: No. The counts are federal dockets that name the firm in CourtListener's records, and the list shows the ones Suitcast has verified as website cases. State-court cases without a public source are not counted, so these numbers are a floor.
Why does the firm appear on this site?: Court filings are public records and the firm's name appears on each docket. Suitcast publishes counts and links to those records so business owners can see who is active in their state. It does not comment on the firm and it does not contact the businesses named as defendants.

Keep going

Check your site for what this firm cites

The free scan loads five public pages and lists the trackers that fire before consent and the accessibility failures complaints cite, so the conversation with your lawyer starts with facts.

Suitcast identifies risk indicators. It is not legal advice and does not determine compliance.