Skip to content

Plaintiff law firm

Gutride Safier LLP

Gutride Safier LLP files website tracking lawsuits against businesses. See where it files and what its complaints cite, then check whether your site has the same issues.

Free, about a minute, no signup for your score.

Federal dockets naming the firm

Last 90 days
1
Last 12 months
20
Most recent filing
Oct 9, 2026
Based in
California
Files over
Website tracking
Counts include federal filings from CourtListener and curated state filings with sources. State-court coverage is partial.

The short answer

Gutride Safier LLP, based in California, is a plaintiff-side law firm named on 20 federal website tracking lawsuit dockets in the last 12 months, 1 of them in the last 90 days, most recently on Oct 9, 2026. Most of its verified filings are against businesses in California. Its complaints most often cite Google Ads conversion and remarketing tag, Google Analytics 4, TikTok Pixel. Counts come from CourtListener docket records and refresh daily.

Where it files

The states and courts in its verified filings

Verified filings in the last 12 months, by the defendant's state and by the federal court the case was filed in.

Defendants by state

Verified filings, 12 months
  1. 1California12
  2. 2New York2
  3. 3Michigan1
  4. 4New Jersey1
  5. 5Ohio1
  6. 6Tennessee1
  7. 7Virginia1
  8. 8Wisconsin1

Federal courts

Verified filings, 12 months
  1. 1District Court, N.D. California19
  2. 2District Court, E.D. Virginia1

Trend

Gutride Safier LLP filings, month by month

Verified filings linked to the firm, by the month they were filed. Firms file in batches, which is why months jump.

Website accessibility (ADA) Website tracking (CIPA)

November 2025 to October 2026, current month to date

What its complaints cite

The issues named in its complaints

Issues found in the complaint text of its verified filings. If your site has these, a letter from this firm would likely list them.

Issues cited

Complaints, 12 months
  1. 1Google Ads conversion and remarketing tag15
  2. 2Google Analytics 414
  3. 3TikTok Pixel10
  4. 4Microsoft Advertising UET tag9
  5. 5Meta Pixel6
  6. 6Snap Pixel6
  7. 7X (Twitter) Pixel6
  8. 8Pinterest Tag5

Industries

Industries it sues

Verified filings in the last 12 months by the defendant's industry.

By the defendant's industry

Verified filings, 12 months
  1. 1Entertainment and media1
  2. 2Banks, lenders and insurance1
  3. 3Food and beverage brands1
  4. 4Nonprofits and religious organizations1
  5. 5Retail and online stores1

Court records

Latest verified filings by Gutride Safier LLP

Newest first. Every row links to the court record.
  1. Tracking

    Woodley v. Google LLC

    N.D. California, filed by Gutride Safier LLP. Attributed to California

    Court recordfor Woodley v. Google LLC (opens in a new tab)
  2. Tracking

    Penning v. Farmers Insurance Company, Inc.

    N.D. California, filed by Gutride Safier LLP. Attributed to California

    Court recordfor Penning v. Farmers Insurance Company, Inc. (opens in a new tab)
  3. Tracking

    Coleman v. Federal National Mortgage Association, Inc.

    N.D. California, filed by Gutride Safier LLP

    Court recordfor Coleman v. Federal National Mortgage Association, Inc. (opens in a new tab)
  4. Tracking

    Ewart v. Fender Musical Instruments Corp.

    N.D. California, filed by Gutride Safier LLP. Attributed to California

    Court recordfor Ewart v. Fender Musical Instruments Corp. (opens in a new tab)
  5. Tracking

    Eugenio v. Premium Brands Opco LLC

    N.D. California, filed by Gutride Safier LLP. Attributed to New York

    Court recordfor Eugenio v. Premium Brands Opco LLC (opens in a new tab)
  6. Tracking

    Campos v. Landry's, Inc.

    N.D. California, filed by Sheppard

    Court recordfor Campos v. Landry's, Inc. (opens in a new tab)
  7. Tracking

    Coleman v. CKE Restaurants Inc.

    N.D. California, filed by Gutride Safier LLP. Attributed to Tennessee

    Court recordfor Coleman v. CKE Restaurants Inc. (opens in a new tab)
  8. Tracking

    Beltran v. FCA US LLC

    N.D. California, filed by Gutride Safier LLP. Attributed to Michigan

    Court recordfor Beltran v. FCA US LLC (opens in a new tab)
  9. Tracking

    Brown v. WebMD LLC

    N.D. California, filed by Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP. Attributed to New York

    Court recordfor Brown v. WebMD LLC (opens in a new tab)
  10. Tracking

    Spears v. The Campbell's Company

    N.D. California, filed by Greenberg Traurig, P.A, Litigation

    Court recordfor Spears v. The Campbell's Company (opens in a new tab)
  11. Tracking

    Munoz v. GoFundMe Inc.

    N.D. California, filed by Gutride Safier LLP. Attributed to California

    Court recordfor Munoz v. GoFundMe Inc. (opens in a new tab)
  12. Tracking

    Fons v. Grocery Outlet, Inc.

    N.D. California, filed by Gutride Safier LLP. Attributed to California

    Court recordfor Fons v. Grocery Outlet, Inc. (opens in a new tab)
  13. Tracking

    Winston v. Safelite Group, Inc.

    N.D. California, filed by Sheppard Mullin

    Court recordfor Winston v. Safelite Group, Inc. (opens in a new tab)
  14. Tracking

    Ortiz v. Kenneth Cole Productions, Inc.

    N.D. California, filed by Gutride Safier LLP. Attributed to California

    Court recordfor Ortiz v. Kenneth Cole Productions, Inc. (opens in a new tab)
  15. Tracking

    Munoz v. Peet's Coffee, Inc.

    N.D. California, filed by Shook, Hardy & Bacon LLP

    Court recordfor Munoz v. Peet's Coffee, Inc. (opens in a new tab)
  16. Tracking

    Shah v. Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc.

    E.D. Virginia, filed by Gutride Safier LLP. Attributed to Virginia

    Court recordfor Shah v. Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. (opens in a new tab)
  17. Tracking

    Moore v. Luxottica of America, Inc.

    N.D. California, filed by Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP. Attributed to Ohio

    Court recordfor Moore v. Luxottica of America, Inc. (opens in a new tab)
  18. Tracking

    Barrales v. Reckitt Benckiser LLC

    N.D. California, filed by Manatt Phelps & Phillips LLP. Attributed to New Jersey

    Court recordfor Barrales v. Reckitt Benckiser LLC (opens in a new tab)
  19. Tracking

    Ortiz v. Deckers Outdoor Corp.

    N.D. California, filed by Stradling Yocca Carlson & Rauth. Attributed to California

    Court recordfor Ortiz v. Deckers Outdoor Corp. (opens in a new tab)
  20. Tracking

    Beltran v. Kohler Co.

    N.D. California, filed by Greenberg Traurig LLP. Attributed to Wisconsin

    Court recordfor Beltran v. Kohler Co. (opens in a new tab)
  21. Tracking

    Penning v. NVIDIA Corporation

    N.D. California, filed by Gutride Safier LLP

    Court recordfor Penning v. NVIDIA Corporation (opens in a new tab)
  22. Tracking

    Kent v. Dave & Buster's Entertainment, Inc.

    N.D. California, filed by Sidley Austin LLP

    Court recordfor Kent v. Dave & Buster's Entertainment, Inc. (opens in a new tab)
  23. Tracking

    Ortiz v. Foris Dax, Inc.

    N.D. California, filed by Winston & Strawn LLP. Attributed to Texas

    Court recordfor Ortiz v. Foris Dax, Inc. (opens in a new tab)

Questions owners ask

What to do with a letter from this firm, and what these numbers include.
I received a letter from Gutride Safier LLP. What should I do?
Do not ignore it and do not reply before talking to a lawyer. Preserve the site as it is by taking dated screenshots and a scan, then fix what the letter cites so the record shows the changes and when they happened. The guides on this site explain what these letters usually say and how owners typically respond in the first week.
Is this every case the firm has filed?
No. The counts are federal dockets that name the firm in CourtListener's records, and the list shows the ones Suitcast has verified as website cases. State-court cases without a public source are not counted, so these numbers are a floor.
Why does the firm appear on this site?
Court filings are public records and the firm's name appears on each docket. Suitcast publishes counts and links to those records so business owners can see who is active in their state. It does not comment on the firm and it does not contact the businesses named as defendants.

Keep going

Check your site for what this firm cites

The free scan loads five public pages and lists the trackers that fire before consent and the accessibility failures complaints cite, so the conversation with your lawyer starts with facts.

Free, about a minute, no signup for your score.

Suitcast identifies risk indicators. It is not legal advice and does not determine compliance.